Highlights
You are here: Home » Tag Archives: decisions of CIC

Tag Archives: decisions of CIC

Right to Information (RTI) – Rules/Notifications/Circulars/Guidelines (Subject-Wise)

More:  Latest DOPT/CVC/RTI/MOF/CGHS/DPE/RBI Orders/Circulars; News   * RTI – Circulars/Notifications/Instructions/Guides/Guidelines * Selected Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC)Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Section-Wise  * Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise RTI – Court Judgements * RTI News * Vigilance Clearance * SCs/STs/OBCs/Minorities and SCs/STs – Circulars/Orders/Guidelines * Vigilance-Related Notifications/Orders/Circulars 

Go to NEWS.

Note:- CIC has launched helpline facility at 011-61117555. Dialling this number you would get the status of the receipt by name, by diary number / diary year and by Complaint / Appeal file number.

Notice on the Homepage of CIC website (January, 2013)
“The Commission in its meeting dated 8.1.2013 decided that no action would be taken on the communications received as appeal against decisions of State Information Commissions since the Commission is not the Appellate body over the SICs. Further, such communications would be sent for weeding out within 2 weeks of its receipt in the Commission.”

1. The Right to Information Act, 2005 – Rules/Notifications/Orders/Circulars (Recent)
2. The Right to Information Act, 2005 – Rules/Notifications/Guides/Orders/Circulars (Subject-Wise)
3
. The Right to Information Act, 2005 – Rules/Notifications/Guides/Orders/Circulars (Chronological)
(i)
Instructions/Circulars issued since 01.01.2010, (ii) Instructions/Circulars issued up to 31.12.2009, (iii) Guides/Guidelines issued by Government up to 31.12.2009, (iv) RTI-related Rules/Instructions, (v) RTI Rules, (vi) RTI Act/Amendment Acts and related Acts, (vii) Selected Decisions of CIC,
4.
Court Judgments

SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS / JUDGEMENTS
* CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi - The Commission directed the PIO/DTTE to inform the reasons for delay in giving the appellant the selection grade and also provide complete correspondence between the respondent and the DTTE within 15 days The Commission also directed to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for not giving complete information to the appellant. (Disclosure of Reasons)
* CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi – CIC: “Hence, the Commission holds that there is a larger public interest that require disclosure of medical records of a patient as mandated under Section 8(1)(j) and directs the respondent authority to furnish the information about the medical records of her husband to the extent ….” (Sections 2,3,4,6(2),7,8,11,18,19, Right to Privacy, Larger Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai – The Commission directed the FAA, Life Insurance Corporation to issue instructions to all the Divisional Offices for charging correct premium in this regard under intimation to the Commission.
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon – The Commission directed the department to compensate the appellant by an amount of Rs.1000/- for the inconvenience and detriment caused to him. [Section 19(8)(b)].
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla – The basic protection afforded by virtue of the exemption from disclosure enacted under Section 8(1)(j) cannot be lifted or disturbed unless the petitioner is able to justify how such disclosure would be in ‘public interest’. [Section 8(1)(j)]
* Office of the Attorney General of India is a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. –  Delhi High Court Judgment dated 10.03.2015 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Office of Attorney General and R.K. Jain Vs. Office of Attorney General of India * CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (Non-Disclosure Agreement, Section 10)
* CIC Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (Voluminous Records, Section 10)
* CIC Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi [Section 5(4)]
* CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi - The Commission directed the CPIO of MoEF to, inter alia, perform their obligation under Section 4(1)(c) and 4(1)(d) of RTI Act, 2005, and to furnish the reasons for formulating the policy of not imposing any restrictions and instead permitting the DDA to go ahead with unrestricted installation of Mobile Towers in the lands of DDA, in spite of recommendations against. The Commission also recommended the Chief Minister’s Office and office of Lieutenant Governor to probe into the reasons for ignoring these vital reports and their recommendations about the adverse effects of EMF from Mobile Towers and also to inform the people as to what measures they would initiate in response to the recommendations of the Inter Ministerial Group or if they have rejected the recommendation, the reasons and grounds for the same. (Sections 4(1)(c)&(d)/Disclosure of Reasons)
* CIC Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi - “The Commission directed the respondent authority to furnish information to the appellant as to the reasons for denial of Selection Grade to him as they are bound to give the same under Section 4(1)(c.) …” (Section 4(1)(c)/Disclosure of Reasons) * Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) - “The Commission reiterates that the Bar Council of Delhi should initiate proceedings against the complainant for alleged misconduct of sending a blank paper as RTI application and causing wastage of public money and time of Public Authority.” (Misuse of RTI/Action against Complainant)Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi – “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to obtain the information from the Society and furnish the same to the Complainant within thirty days of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission, therefore, directs the respondent authority to inquire into the complaint of the complainant and provide the action taken report on the same within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi “The Commission also advises the appellant not to file repeated RTI applications which are aimless and useless. The Commission also advises the respondent authority not to share any personal information of the officers with the people like the appellant without invoking Section 11 of the RTI Act.” (Abuse of RTI) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi - “The CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant copies of such agreements, if available on the records of the public authority, by severing any information of a personal nature concerning the advocates, such as their personal address, bank account and income tax details etc., under Section 10 of the RTI Act.” [Section 10] * CIC Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai - The Commission cautioned the FAA to strictly follow the RTI regime while disposing of appeals and pass a speaking order, after taking due cognizance of merits of each case. * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi - “… names, addresses and phone nos./email addresses of all plaintiffs cannot be provided to the appellant as the same is third party information u/s 8(1)(j), the disclosure of which serves no larger public interest. … .. the appellant has neither suffered any detriment nor is there any public interest in seeking the information. Therefore, his plea for award of compensation is not accepted.” * Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) * CIC Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi - “… the candidate with regard to his/her own answer sheet can obtain the copy of the same as a matter of right, but with regard to the answer sheet of third party, unless the candidate is able to show that large public interest is involved, the same cannot be furnished unless the candidate from whom it is sought for permits the same.” The Commission, therefore, directed to follow the procedure for supplying third party information U/S 11 of RTI Act, by seeking the opinion of the third party and taking a final decision by the PIO in this respect. [Sections 3, 8(1)(j), 11 and 19(3)]  * CIC Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission require the Chief Secretary of Delhi and Union Cabinet Secretary to disclose their policy on this issue under Section 4 of Right to Information Act and also inform the appellants about their proposed steps to implement recommendation of Lokayuktha of Delhi in effectively preventing photo publicity of the political rulers.” * CIC Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal, New Delhi - The Commission recommended change of officer to be designated as FAA. * CIC Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi [Sections 7(9), 18 & 20] * Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi - The CIC has directed the Law Ministry to disclose the Cabinet note about the decision to establish a National Judicial Appointments Commission, saying that such documents are not secret and should thus be made public. * CIC Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain [Sections 8(1)(e), 8(1)(j)] * Delhi HC Judgement dated 04.12.2014 – The Registrar, Supreme Court of India Vs. Commodore Lokesh K. Batra and Ors. - Hon’ble Delhi High Court: “I find no infirmity with the impugned order in so far as it directs that the records may be maintained in a manner so that the information regarding the period for which the judgments are pending after being reserved, is available with the petitioner in future.” [Sections 4(1)(b), 7(9) and 19(8)(a)(iv)] * Madras High Court Judgement dated 17.09.2014 – PIO-Registrar (Admn.), High Court, Madras Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi & another - “… … the first respondent-Commission clearly erred in passing the impugned order in this Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to furnish the details to the second respondent as well as sending a tabular statement listing all the complaints and representations received from the second respondent.” [Section 2(f)] * CIC Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi - CIC: “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to conduct an inquiry u/s 18(2) of the RTI Act to find out reasons and officer responsible for delay in payment of remuneration to the Appellant for nearly three years, for initiating disciplinary action against such officer. …” * CIC Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi - CIC: “The Appellate Authority is cautioned not to dismiss any appeals without reading the contents of the appeals or hearing the parties.” * CIC Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board - “The Commission … … recommends the Public Authority to treat the RTI application as a complaint and as a regulatory initiate action against the persons who had installed nonfunctioning meters.” * Madras High Court Judgement dated 17.09.2014 – PIO-Registrar (Admn.), High Court, Madras Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi & another - “… … the first respondent-Commission clearly erred in passing the impugned order in this Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to furnish the details to the second respondent as well as sending a tabular statement listing all the complaints and representations received from the second respondent.” * CIC Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi – “The Commission recommends the respondent authority to prepare a consolidated report of the appellant’s RTI applications and upload the same in their website, showing it as a case of misuse of RTI.” * CIC Decision dated 25.06.2014 – Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi - CIC advised the DOPT the framing of the guidelines for prevention of abuse of the RTI Act, 2005 * CIC Decision dated 19.06.2014 – Lt. Gen. S.S. Dahiya (Retd.) Vs. CPIO, Appellate Authority, Air Hqrs., Vayu Bhawan, New Delhi - Air Force Sports Complex is a Public Authority under the RTI Act, 2005. * CIC Decision dated 21.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara - The mere pendency of investigation is not sufficient justification by itself for withholding the information.” * CIC Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Hardeep Singh Sawhney Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi - Additional information can not be sought at the appeal stage. More … CIC Decisions

1. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 – RULES/NOTIFICATIONS/ORDERS/CIRCULARS (Recent)

* DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding
* O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of
* Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15)
*
Circular dated 14.01.2015 – Introduction of postal stamps as RTI fee/cost – seeking comment from public regarding
* O.M. dated 11.11.2014 – Report of the Committee to evolve model formats for RTI Replies
* O.M. dated 10.11.2014 – Guidelines on Internship for Undergraduates or graduates pursuing 5-year integrated course/Bachelor’s degree in Law under the CSS relating to RTI Act
* O.M. dated 21.10.2014 – Uploading of RTI replies on the respective website of Ministry/Department Regional Workshop on the theme Implementation of RTI Act -Problems faced and Roadmap for the future to be organised by HIPA, Gurgaon on 4th December, 2014 (As on DOPT website – 21.10.2014) * O.M. dated 07.10.2014 – RTI online Certificate Course conducted by the Department of Personnel and Training * O.M. dated 22.09.2014 – Guidelines on implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005 – Compliance of * O.M. dated 22.08.2014 – Guidelines for grants to ATIs and SICs under the various components of the CSS on Improving Transparency and Accountability in Govt.-RTI Act-2014-15 * O.M. dated 14.08.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date up to 01.09.2014) * O.M. dated 30.07.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date – 15.08.2014) * O.M. dated 10.07.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date – 25.07.2014) * O.M. dated 07.07.2014 – Financial assistance for setting up RTI Cell in Public Authority  * O.M. dated 28.05.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II * CIC’s Check List for Second Appeal under Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005 and the RTI Rules, 2012 (As on CIC website – 05.05.2014) * 27.03.2014 – Report of the National Workshop on RTI held on 09.01.2014 * O.M. dated 14.03.2014 – RTI Web Portal for online filing of RTI applications * O.M. dated 27.02.2014 – Extension of date for applications for grant of four Fellowships in RTI up to 10.03.2014 More: RTI Orders/Circulars

2. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 – RULES/NOTIFICATIONS/GUIDES/ORDERS/CIRCULARS (Subject-Wise)

20 years old information * ACRs * Annual Reports of CIC * Behaviour with Information Seekers * Best Practices on RTI * Central Point for receiving applications * Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) * CIC Orders/Instructions * Compendium on RTI Act * Complaint to CIC * CPIOs / CAPIOs * Definition of Information * Disposal of First Appeal / Appeal Rules * Fellowship * File Notings * Format for Giving Information * Format for RTI Replies * Guidelines for PIOs/FAAs * High Court Judgements * Implementation of RTI Act, 2005 / RTI Cells * Internship for Undergraduates/Graduates * Inventory of Public Authorities * Maintenance of Records / Suo Motu Disclosure – Section 4 of the RTI Act * National Workshop * Non-Implementation by Public Authorities * Online RTI Returns * Instructions for filing online RTI returns (31.5.2011) * Payment of Fees under the RTI Act, 2005 / Payment of Fee / Cost Rules * Payment of Additional Fee * Placing in the Public Domain * Quarterly Progress on Flagship Programmes * RTI Act * RTI Application (online filing) * RTI applications concerning other Public Authorities * RTI Fellowship * RTI – Guides/Guidelines, Template for Information Handbook (Sec.4) * RTI Online Course * RTI Rules, 2012 * RTI-Related Rules/Guidelines * Second Appeal to the Commission – Form as per the RTI Rules, 2012 * Second Schedule to the RTI Act * Section 6(2) – Personal Details of RTI Applicant * Section 8(1)(j) – Personal Information * Suo Motu Disclosure * Study on the implementation of RTI Act * Third Party Information * Transfer of RTI applications * Updating of Records * Workshop

20 years old information
O.M. dated 31.10.2007 – 20 years old information
ACRs
O.M. dated 21.9.2007 – Disclosure of ACRs
Annual Reports of CIC
O.M. dated 20.05.2011 – Laying of Annual Reports of the Central Information Commission before the Houses of Parliament
Behaviour with Information Seekers
O.M. dated 24.6.2008 – Courteous behaviour with the persons seeking information under RTI Act, 2005 Best Practices on RTI O.M. dated 30.07.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date – 15.08.2014). O.M. dated 28.06.2013 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI O.M. dated 14.05.2013 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI
Central Point for receiving applications
O.M. dated 22.04.2013 – Launch of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application O.M. dated 14.11.2007 – Central point for receiving applications, etc.
Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) 
O.M. dated 22.08.2014 – Guidelines for grants to ATIs and SICs under the various components of the CSS on Improving Transparency and Accountability in Govt.-RTI Act-2014-15
. O.M. dated 18.07.2013 – Guidelines on Awareness Generation and Capacity Building – Centrally Sponsored Scheme for effective implementation of RTI Act for the years 2013-14
CIC Orders/Instructions
CIC – RTI: A Compendium Guidelines for filing online Quarterly Returns by Public Authorities (As on CIC website) D.O. letter dated 31.03.2011 – Implementation of Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 CIC Circular dated 09.12.2010 – (i) Role of CPIO & Transparency Officer, (ii) Level of Transparency Officer (TO), and (iii) Job Chart of TO D.O. letter dated 18.11.2010 – Implementation of Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 CIC Direction dated 15.11.2010 – Implementation of Sec. 4 of the RTI Act – Direction to Public Authorities under Sec. 19(8) of RTI Act Notification dated 11.10.2005 – (RTI-Central Information Commission)
Compendium on the RTI Act, 2005
* O.M. dated 14.08.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date up to 01.09.2014) * O.M. dated 10.07.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date – 25.07.2014) * O.M. dated 28.05.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II Compendium of Best Practices on RTI (Vol.I) – 27.02.2014 (As on DOPT website-09.02.2015) * DOPT’s Compilation of OMs & Notifications on RTI Act, 2005 (25.10.2013)
Complaint to CIC

* Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15)
CPIOs / CAPIOs
O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of
O.M. dated 14.11.2007 – CPIOs in the 2nd Schedule in the Act O.M. dated 6.10.2005 – Designation of CAPIOs by public authorities
Definition of Information
O.M. dated 1.6.2009 – High Court of Bombay decision-Definition of information-Regarding
Disposal of First Appeal / Appeal Rules
O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of
For revised procedure, please see the RTI Rules, 2012 under “RTI Rules, 2012”.
O.M. dated 9.7.2007 – Disposal of first appeal Notification dated 28.10.2005 – Appeal Rules
File Notings O.M. dated 23.6.2009 – Disclosure of file noting under the RTI Act Format for Giving Information DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding
Format for RTI Replies
* O.M. dated 11.11.2014 – Report of the Committee to evolve model formats for RTI Replies
* O.M. dated 22.04.2013 – Launch of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application * O.M. dated 10.7.2008 – Clarification regarding format in which the information should be supplied under the RTI Act
Guidelines for PIOs/FAAs
O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of

High Court Judgements
CVC Circular dated 04.04.2013 – Delhi High Court’s decision in LPA No.618 of 2012 dated 06.11.2012 in the matter of disclosure of information under the RTI Act, relating to disciplinary matters Delhi High Court Judgement dated 21.05.2010 – DDA v. Central Information Commission & another To see more judgments, please click here.
Implementation of RTI Act, 2005 / RTI Cells
O.M. dated 22.04.2013 – Launch of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application O.M. dated 02.08.2012 – Financial assistance for setting up RTI Cells O.M. dated 19.05.2011 – Effective implementation of RTI Act, 2005 – Setting up of RTI Cells O.M. dated 18.05.2011 – Strengthening implementation of the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 16.08.2010 – Guidelines on Awareness Generation & Capacity Building components of Central Sec. Scheme on Improving Transparency & Accountability in Govt. through effective implementation Letter dated 23.6.2008 – Initiatives for effective implementation of the RTI Act, 2005 Circular dated 09.01.2008 – NGOs to spread awareness O.M. dated 21.2.2006 – Implementation of the various provision of the RTI Act, 2005
Internship for Undergraduates/Graduates
* O.M. dated 10.11.2014 – Guidelines on Internship for Undergraduates or graduates pursuing 5-year integrated course/Bachelor’s degree in Law under the CSS relating to RTI Act * O.M. dated 15.10.2012 – Internship for Undergraduates pursuing 5-year course in Law under CSS on Improving Transparency and Accountability in govt. through implementation of RTI Act for 2012-13
Inventory of Public Authorities
O.M. dated 31.7.2007 – Preparation of Inventory of Public Authorities under RTI Act, 2005
Maintenance of Records / Suo Motu Disclosure – Section 4 of the RTI Act 
* O.M. dated 22.09.2014 – Guidelines on implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005 – Compliance of * O.M. dated 10.12.2013 – Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005
. D.O. letter dated 21.11.2013 – Guidelines for suo motu disclosure under RTI Act, 2005 by State Government. O.M. dated 15.04.2013 – Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 – Issue of guidelines regarding O.M. dated 03.04.2013 – Suo motu disclosure of official tours of Ministers and other officials O.M. dated 11.09.2012 – Suo motu disclosure on official tours of Ministers and other officials Minutes of the meeting of the Task Force constituted for effect implementation of Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 – regarding (1.6.2011) O.M. dated 20.1.2010 – Maintenance of records in consonance with Section 4 of the RTI Act O.M. dated 28.7.2008 – Clarifications regarding Sub-Sections (4) and (5) of Section 5 of the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 21.9.2007 – Records and Information under the Act Template for Information Handbook (Sec.4)
National Workshop
27.03.2014 – Report of the National Workshop on RTI held on 09.01.2014
Non-Implementation by Public Authorities
O.M. dated 23.3.2007 – Non-implementation by public authorities
Online RTI Returns
Instructions for filing online RTI returns (31.5.2011)
Payment of Fees under the RTI Act, 2005 / Payment of Fee / Cost Rules   
* Circular dated 14.01.2015 – Introduction of postal stamps as RTI fee/cost – seeking comment from public regarding * O.M. dated 13.02.2014 – Electronic Indian Postal Order – extension of service to Indian Citizens residing in India * O.M. dated 07.10.2013 – Extending the facility of e-IPO for payment of RTI fee in Indian Missions by Indian citizens abroad * O.M. dated 17.05.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application * O.M. dated 22.04.2013 – Launch of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application * O.M. dated 22.03.2013 – Electronic Indian Postal Order – launching of
For revised procedure, please see the RTI Rules, 2012 under “RTI Rules, 2012”.
Letter dated 26.04.2011 – Harmonization of fee payable under the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 26.04.2011 – Payment of fee under the RTI Act by Indian Postal Order O.M. dated 24.5.2010 – Payment of fee under the Right to Information Act, 2005 – Scope of sub-section (3) of Section 7 of the Act O.M. dated 5.12.2008 – Payment of fee by demand draft / bankers’ cheque / IPO Notification dated 17.5.2006 – Regulation of Fee and Cost Rules, 2005 Notification dated 27.10.2005 – Amendment to Fee and Cost Rules, 2005 Notification dated 16.9.2005 – Regulation of Fee and Cost Rules, 2005
Payment of Additional Fee
O.M. dated 11.02.2013 – Timely intimation about payment of additional fee under RTI Act, 2005
Placing in the Public Domain
O.M. dated 08.06..2011 – Submission of Immovable Property Returns by Officers of Group ‘A’ Central Services and placing the same in public domain
O.M. dated 23.05.2011 – Submission of Immovable Property Returns by Officers of Group ‘A’ Central Services for 2010 (as on 1.1.2011) – Placing in the public domain
Quarterly Progress on Flagship Programmes
D.O. letter dated 04.10.2013 – Quarterly progress on the flagship programmes, initiatives and iconic projects being reviewed under the Delivery Monitoring Unit (DMU) mechanism

RTI Act
Notification dated 8.10.2008 – Amendments in the 2nd Schedule to RTI Act Notification dated 27.3.2008 – Further amendment to 2nd Scheduled to RTI Act
Notification dated 28.9.2005 – Further amendments to 2nd Schedule to RTI Act
सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, २००५ / सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, २००५ [१ फ़रवरी २०११ को यथाविद्यमान]
Right to Information Act, 2005
RTI Application (Online Filing)
O.M. dated 14.03.2014 – RTI Web Portal for online filing of RTI applications.
O.M. dated 12.08.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application
O.M. dated 30.07.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application
O.M. dated 17.05.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application
O.M. dated 22.04.2013 – Launch of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application
RTI applications concerning other Public Authorities
O.M. dated 24.09.2010 – RTI applications received by a public authority regarding information concerning other public authorities
O.M. dated 1.6.2009 – RTI applications relating to other public authorities
O.M. dated 12.6.2008 – RTI applications received by a public authority reg. information concerning other public authorities O.M. dated 22.4.2008 – Transfer of applications under the RTI Act, 2005
RTI Cell
* O.M. dated 07.07.2014 – Financial assistance for setting up RTI Cell in Public Authority * O.M. dated 02.08.2012 – Financial assistance for setting up RTI Cells * O.M. dated 19.05.2011 – Effective implementation of RTI Act, 2005 – Setting up of RTI Cells
RTI Fellowship 

* O.M. dated 27.02.2014 – Extension of date for applications for grant of four Fellowships in RTI up to 10.03.2014 * Guidelines for Right to Information Fellowship (As on DOPT Website – 05.02.2014) * Corrigendum dated 12.01.2012 – RTI Fellowships 2012 O.M. 09.01.2012 – RTI Fellowships 2012 DOP&T’s Guidelines for RTI Fellowship (17.12.2011) Letter dated 01.03.2011 – Offer of Award of Right to Information Fellowship Corrigendum dated 24.12.2010 – Date of submitting application for RTI fellowship extended to 10.1.2011 Guidelines for RTI Fellowship by Government
RTI – Guides/Guidelines
O.M. dated 28.11.2013 – Guide on the Right to Information Act, 2005.
O.M. dated 5.10.2009 – Guide on the RTI Act, 2005
Guidelines for Plan Scheme for effective implementation of the RTI Act
O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – Pratham Appealiya Pradhikariyon Ke Liye Margdarshika O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – GUIDE FOR FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005
O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – Lok Pradhikarno Ke Liye Margdarshika O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – GUIDE FOR THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005
O.M. dated 27.2.2008 – Kendra Lok Soochana Adhikariyon Ke Liye Margdarshika
O.M. dated 27.2.2008 – GUIDE FOR CPIO UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005
O.M. dated 8.11.2007 – Guide for Information Seekers(Hindi & English) Template for Information Handbook (Sec.4)
RTI Online Course
O.M. dated 07.10.2014 – RTI online Certificate Course conducted by the Department of Personnel and Training
RTI-Related Rules/Guidelines
Record Retention Schedule in Respect of Records Common to All Ministries/Departments Public Records Rules, 1997
RTI Rules 
* Notification dated 31.07.2012 – Right to Information Rules, 2012 * Notification dated 31.8.2006 – Amendment to Notification dated 28.10.2005  * Notification dated 17.5.2006 – Regulation of Fee and Cost Rules, 2005  * Notification dated 28.10.2005 – Appeal Rules  * Notification dated 27.10.2005 – Amendment to Fee and Cost Rules, 2005  * Notification dated 16.9.2005 – Regulation to Fee and Cost Rules, 2005 Second Appeal to the Commission * Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) * CIC’s Check List for Second Appeal under Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005 and the RTI Rules, 2012 (As on CIC website – 05.05.2014) * Form of 2nd Appeal to the Commission, as per the RTI Rules, 2012
Second Schedule to the RTI Act
Notification dated 9.6.2011 – Inclusion of CBI, NIA & NATGRID in 2nd Schedule to the RTI Act
Section 6(2) – Personal details of RTI Applicant 
* O.M. dated 08.01.2014 – Order dated 20.11.2013 of Calcutta High Court in Writ Petition No.33290 of 2013 in the case of Mr. Avishek Goenka Vs. Union of India regarding personal details of RTI applicant
Section 8(1)(j) – Personal Information

O.M. dated 14.08.2013 – Disclosure of personal information under the RTI Act, 2005
Suo Motu Disclosure   
O.M. dated 10.12.2013 – Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005
.
D.O. letter dated 21.11.2013 – Guidelines for suo motu disclosure under RTI Act, 2005 by State Government.
O.M. dated 15.04.2013 – Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 – Issue of guidelines regarding
O.M. dated 03.04.2013 – Suo motu disclosure of official tours of Ministers and other officials
O.M. dated 11.09.2012 – Suo motu disclosure on official tours of Ministers and other officials Minutes of the meeting of the Task Force constituted for effect implementation of Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 – regarding (1.6.2011)
O.M. dated 20.1.2010 – Maintenance of records in consonance with Section 4 of the RTI Act
O.M. dated 28.7.2008 – Clarifications regarding Sub-Sections (4) and (5) of Section 5 of the RTI Act, 2005
O.M. dated 21.9.2007 – Records and Information under the Act Template for Information Handbook (Sec.4)
Study on the Implementation of RTI Act
Letter dated 02.08.2013 – A 360 Degree Study on the implementation of the Right to Information Act, 2005
Third Party Information
O.M. dated 27.4.2010 – Disclosure of third party information under RTI Act, 2005
Transfer of RTI applications
O.M. dated 22.4.2008 – Transfer of applications under the RTI Act, 2005
Updating of Records
O.M. dated 14.11.2007 – Updating of records
Workshop
Regional Workshop on the theme Implementation of RTI Act -Problems faced and Roadmap for the future to be organised by HIPA, Gurgaon on 4th December, 2014 (As on DOPT website – 21.10.2014)

3. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 – RULES/NOTIFICATIONS/GUIDES/ORDERS/CIRCULARS (Chronologically)
I. RTI – Instructions/Circulars issued since 01.01.2010
II. RTI – Instructions/Circulars issued up to 31.12.2009
III. RTI – Guides/Guidelines issued by Government up to 31.12.2009 IV. RTI-related Rules/Instructions
V. RTI Rules
VI. RTI Act/Amendment Acts and related Acts
VII. SELECTED DECISIONS OF CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (CIC)Full Bench Decisions VIII. RTI – Court judgements

I. RTI – Instructions/Circulars issued since 01.01.2010 (Chronological) (To see/access copies, please click here.)   

DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) Circular dated 14.01.2015 – Introduction of postal stamps as RTI fee/cost – seeking comment from public regarding O.M. dated 11.11.2014 – Report of the Committee to evolve model formats for RTI Replies O.M. dated 10.11.2014 – Guidelines on Internship for Undergraduates or graduates pursuing 5-year integrated course/Bachelor’s degree in Law under the CSS relating to RTI Act *O.M. dated 21.10.2014 – Uploading of RTI replies on the respective website of Ministry/Department Regional Workshop on the theme Implementation of RTI Act – Problems faced and Roadmap for the future to be organised by HIPA, Gurgaon on 4th December, 2014 (As on DOPT website – 21.10.2014) O.M. dated 07.10.2014 – RTI online Certificate Course conducted by the Department of Personnel and Training O.M. dated 22.09.2014 – Guidelines on implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005 – Compliance of O.M. dated 22.08.2014 – Guidelines for grants to ATIs and SICs under the various components of the CSS on Improving Transparency and Accountability in Govt.-RTI Act-2014-15 O.M. dated 14.08.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date up to 01.09.2014) O.M. dated 10.07.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II (Last date – 25.07.2014) O.M. dated 07.07.2014 – Financial assistance for setting up RTI Cell in Public Authority O.M. dated 28.05.2014 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI – Vol.II 27.03.2014 – Report of the National Workshop on RTI held on 09.01.2014 O.M. dated 14.03.2014 – RTI Web Portal for online filing of RTI applications O.M. dated 27.02.2014 – Extension of date for applications for grant of four Fellowships in RTI up to 10.03.2014 O.M. dated 13.02.2014 – Electronic Indian Postal Order – extension of service to Indian Citizens residing in India Guidelines for Right to Information Fellowship (As on DOPT Website – 05.02.2014) O.M. dated 08.01.2014 – Order dated 20.11.2013 of the High Court of Kolkata in Writ Petition No.33290 of 2013 in the case of Mr. Avishek Goenka Vs. Union of India regarding personal details of RTI applicants – circulation of O.M. dated 10.12.2013 – Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 28.11.2013 –Guide on the Right to Information Act, 2005 D.O. letter dated 21.11.2013 – Guidelines for suo motu disclosure under RTI Act, 2005 by State Government DOPT’s Compilation of OMs & Notifications on RTI Act, 2005 (25.10.2013) O.M. dated 07.10.2013 – Extending the facility of e-IPO for payment of RTI fee in Indian Missions by Indian citizens abroad D.O. letter dated 04.10.2013 – Quarterly progress on the flagship programmes, initiatives and iconic projects being reviewed under the Delivery Monitoring Unit (DMU) mechanism O.M. dated 14.08.2013 – Disclosure of personal information under the RTI Act, 2005 Letter dated 02.08.2013 – A 360 Degree Study on the implementation of the Right to Information Act, 2005O.M. dated 30.07.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application O.M. dated 12.08.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application O.M. dated 18.07.2013 – Guidelines on Awareness Generation and Capacity Building – Centrally Sponsored Scheme for effective implementation of RTI Act for the years 2013-14 to 2015-16 O.M. dated 28.06.2013 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI O.M. dated 17.05.2013 – Extension of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application O.M. dated 14.05.2013 – Publishing of Compendium of Best Practices on RTI O.M. dated 22.04.2013 – Launch of RTI web portal for online filing of RTI application O.M. dated 15.04.2013 – Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 – Issue of guidelines regarding CVC Circular dated 04.04.2013 – Delhi High Court’s decision in LPA No.618 of 2012 dated 06.11.2012 in the matter of disclosure of information under the RTI Act, relating to disciplinary matters O.M. dated 03.04.2013 – Suo motu disclosure of official tours of Ministers and other officials O.M. dated 22.03.2013 – Electronic Indian Postal Order – launching of O.M. dated 11.02.2013 – Timely intimation about payment of additional fee under RTI Act, 2005 D.O. letter dated 07.01.2013 – Quarterly progress on the flagship programmes under the DMU mechanism CIC – RTI: A Compendium Delhi High Court Judgment dated 6.11.2012 on Sec. 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act O.M. dated 15.10.2012 – Internship for Undergraduates pursuing 5-year course in Law under CSS on Improving Transparency and Accountability in govt. through implementation of RTI Act for 2012-13 O.M. dated 11.09.2012 – Suo motu disclosure on official tours of Ministers and other officials O.M. dated 02.08.2012 – Financial assistance for setting up RTI Cells Notification dated 31.07.2012 – Right to Information Rules, 2012 Letter dated 04.06.2012 – Guidelines on Awareness Generation and Capacity Building components of Centrally Sponsored Schemes on Improving Transparency and Accountability through effective implementation of RTI RTI – Ministry-wise and Public Authority-wise Abstract of Quarterly Returns National Awards on e-Governance 2011-12 Winners DOP&T’s Guidelines for RTI Fellowship (17.12.2011) O.M. dated 16.09.2011 – Observations of Hon’ble Supreme Court on RTI Act, 2005 in Civil Appeal No.6454 of 2011 (SLP(C) No.7526 of 2009) in case of CBSE & Or. Vs. Aditya Bandopadjhyay & Or. Transparency Officer in respect of Deptt. of Expenditure (MOF O.M. dated 22.7.2011) Notification dated 9.6.2011 – Inclusion of CBI, NIA & NATGRID in 2nd Schedule to the RTI Act O.M. dated 08.06..2011 – Submission of Immovable Property Returns by Officers of Group ‘A’ Central Services and placing the same in public domain O.M. dated 23.05.2011 – Submission of Immovable Property Returns by Officers of Group ‘A’ Central Services for 2010 (as on 1.1.2011) – Placing in the public domain Minutes of the meeting of the Task Force constituted for effect implementation of Section 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 – regarding (1.6.2011) Instructions for filing online RTI returns (31.5.2011) O.M. dated 20.05.2011 – Decision dated 3.4.2008 of High Court of Bombay at Goa in Writ Petition No.419 of 2007 in the case of Dr. Ceisa Pinto Vs. Goa State Infomation Commission O.M. dated 20.05.2011 – Laying of Annual Reports of the Central Information Commission before the Houses of Parliament O.M. dated 19.05.2011 – Effective implementation of RTI Act, 2005 – Setting up of RTI Cells O.M. dated 18.05.2011 – Strengthening implementation of the RTI Act, 2005 Letter dated 26.04.2011 – Harmonization of fee payable under the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 26.04.2011 – Payment of fee under the RTI Act by Indian Postal Order Letter dated 01.03.2011 – Offer of Award of Right to Information Fellowship O.M. dated 10.12.2010 – Proposed amendment to RTI Rules (comments may be sent by 27.12.2010) CIC Circular dated 09.12.2010 – (i) Role of CPIO & Transparency Officer, (ii) Level of Transparency Officer (TO), and (iii) Job Chart of TO CIC Direction dated 15.11.2010 – Section 4 of the RTI Act – Direction to Public Authorities under Sec. 19(8) of RTI Act Guidelines for RTI Fellowship by Government (Last date: 3.1.2011) (New) O.M. dated 24.09.2010 – RTI applications received by a public authority regarding information concerning other public authorities (please click here) O.M. dated 16.08.2010 – Guidelines on Awareness Generation & Capacity Building components of Central Sec. Scheme on Improving Transparency & Accountability in Govt. through effective implementation Delhi High Court Judgement dated 21.05.2010 – DDA v. Central Information Commission & another O.M. dated 24.5.2010 – Payment of fee under the Right to Information Act, 2005 – Scope of sub-section (3) of Section 7 of the Act (New) O.M. dated 27.4.2010 – Disclosure of third party information under RTI Act, 2005 (Imp.) O.M. dated 1.4.2010 – Questionnaire to facilitate strategy formulation on RTI under the Performance Management and Evaluation System for DOP&T (Imp.) O.M. dated 20.1.2010 – Maintenance of records in consonance with Section 4 of the RTI Act (Imp.)

II. RTI – Instructions/Circulars issued up to 31.12.2009 (To see/access copies, please click here)

O.M. dated 23.6.2009 – Disclosure of file noting under the RTI Act (Imp.) O.M. dated 1.6.2009 – High Court of Bombay decision-Definition of information-Regarding O.M. dated 1.6.2009 – RTI applications relating to other public authorities (Imp.) O.M. dated 5.12.2008 – Payment of fee by demand draft/banker’s cheque/IPO (Imp.) O.M. dated 28.7.2008 – Clarifications regarding Sub-Sections (4) and (5) of Section 5 of the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 10.7.2008 – Clarification regarding format in which the information should be supplied under the RTI Act O.M. dated 24.6.2008 – Courteous behaviour with the persons seeking information under RTI Act, 2005 Letter dated 23.6.2008 – Initiatives for effective implementation of the RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 12.6.2008 – RTI applications received by a public authority reg. information concerning other public authorities (Imp.) Letter dated 29.4.2008 – Regarding the case, Ahmedabad Education Society & Another Vs. UOI & Ors O.M. dated 22.4.2008 – Transfer of applications under the RTI Act, 2005 (Imp.) Circular dated 9.1.08 – NGOs to spread awareness O.M. dated 14.11.2007 – Central point for receiving applications, etc. O.M. dated 14.11.2007 – Updating of records (Imp.) O.M. dated 14.11.2007 – CPIOs in the 2nd Schedule in the Act O.M. dated 31.10.2007 – 20 years old information (Imp.) O.M. dated 21.9.2007 – Records and Information under the Act (Imp.) O.M. dated 21.9.2007 – Disclosure of ACRs (Imp.) O.M. dated 31.7.2007 – Preparation of Inventory of Public Authorities under RTI Act, 2005 O.M. dated 9.7.2007 – Disposal of first appeal (Imp.) O.M. dated 23.3.2007 – Non-implementation by public authorities O.M. dated 21.2.2006 – Implementation of the various provision of the RTI Act, 2005 Notification dated 11.10.2005 – (RTI-Central Information Commission) O.M. dated 6.10.2005 – Designation of CAPIOs by public authorities

III. RTI – Guides/Guidelines issued by Government up to 31.12.2009 (To see/access copies, please click here)

O.M. dated 5.10.2009 – Guide on the RTI Act, 2005 (Imp.) Guidelines for Plan Scheme for effective implementation of the RTI Act O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – Pratham Appealiya Pradhikariyon Ke Liye Margdarshika (Imp.) O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – GUIDE FOR FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005 (Imp.) O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – Lok Pradhikarno Ke Liye Margdarshika (Imp.) O.M. dated 25.4.2008 – GUIDE FOR THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005 (Imp.) O.M. dated 27.2.2008 – Kendra Lok Soochana Adhikariyon Ke Liye Margdarshika (Imp.) O.M. dated 27.2.2008 – GUIDE FOR CPIO UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005 (Imp.) O.M. dated 8.11.2007 – Guide for Information Seekers(Hindi & English) (Imp.) Template for Information Handbook (Sec.4)

IV. RTI-related Rules/Instructions (To see/access copies, please click here)

Record Retention Schedule in respect of records common to all Ministries and Departments (Imp.) Public Records Rules, 1997 (Imp.)

V. RTI Rules (To see/access copies, please click here)

Notification dated 31.07.2012 – Right to Information Rules, 2012 Notification dated 31.8.2006 – Amendment to Notification dated 28.10.2005 Notification dated 17.5.2006 – Regulation of Fee and Cost Rules, 2005 Notification dated 28.10.2005 – Appeal Rules Notification dated 27.10.2005 – Amendment to Fee and Cost Rules, 2005 Notification dated 16.9.2005 – Regulation to Fee and Cost Rules, 2005

VI. RTI Act/Amendment Acts and related Acts (To access copies, please click here)

Notification dated 9.6.2011 – Inclusion of CBI, NIA & NATGRID in 2nd Schedule to the RTI Act Notification dated 8.10.2008 – Amendments in the 2nd Schedule to RTI Act Notification dated 27.3.2008 – Further amendment to 2nd Schedule to RTI Act Notification dated 28.9.2005 – Further amendments to 2nd Schedule to RTI Act Public Records Act, 1993 (Imp.) Official Secrets Act, 1923 (Imp.) Soochna Ka Adhikar Adhiniyam, 2005 (Imp.) Right to Information Act, 2005 (Imp.) Delhi Right to Information Act, 2001 (Old Act)

VII. SELECTED DECISIONS OF CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (CIC)

You may like to click on the following links:- Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Section-Wise Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise

FULL BENCH DECISIONS  (To see the list of decisions so as to access complete copy of the decisions, please click here)

Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 04.07.2013 – Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 20.02.2013 – Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi Decision dated 10.10.2011 – Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) Vs. Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 24.08.2011 – Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 31.01.2011 – Shri Z.U. Alvi Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 31.01.2011 – Shri Z.U. Alvi Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 15.10.2010 – Shri Shanmuga Patro Vs. Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 29.09.2010 – Brig. (Retd.) Ujjal Dasgupta (Dr. B. Malhotra-Representative Appellant) Vs. CDAC; Advocate for RAW, Director & CPIO, Cab. Sectt. (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 28.09.2010 – Shri V.R. Chandran Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 14.07.2010 – Ms. Bindu Khanna, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Education, GNCT, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) Decision dated 10.06.2010 – Shri Manohar, Shri J.K. Routray & Shri Gurbax Singh Vs. AGs of Goa, Orisaa and Punjab

4. COURT JUDGMENTS  (Please click here)

i. SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS

Sec. 8(1)(g)

SC Judgment dated 13.12.2012 – Bihar Public Service Commission Vs. Saiyed Hussain Abba Rizwi & onr.

Sec. 8(1)(j)

SC Judgment dated 03.10.2012 – Girish Chandra Deshpande Vs. Central Informtion Commissioner & Ors.

Sec. 10

SC Judgment dated 13.12.2012 – Bihar Public Service Commission Vs. Saiyed Hussain Abba Rizwi & onr.

Doctrine of Precedence

SC Judgment dated 13.09.2012 – Namita Sharma Vs. Union of India

Uncategorized

Supreme Court Judgment dated 02.09.2011 – Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. Shaunak H. Satya & Ors. Supreme Court Judgment dated 09.08.2011 – CBSE & Another Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors. Supreme Court Judgment dated 18.04.2011 – P.C. Wadhwa Vs Central Information Commission and Ors.

ii. HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS

Section 8(1)(e)

Delhi High Court Judgment dated 09.11.2012 – Union of India & Ors. Vs. V.K. Shad and Others

Section 8(1)(j)

Delhi High Court Judgment dated 06.11.2012 – UPSC Vs. R.K. Jain

Uncategorized

Jharkhand High Court Judgment dated 11.07.2011 – Commissioner (Appeal) of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ranchi Vs Central Information Commission and Anr. Bombay High Court judgement dated 11.10.2010 – Board of Management of Bombay Properties of Indian Institute of Science Vs. CIC & Union of India Delhi High Court Judgement dated 21.05.2010 – DDA v. Central Information Commission & another Delhi High Court judgement dated 15.4.2010 – National Stock Exchange is a public authority Delhi High Court Judgement dated 15.2.2010 – Union of India Vs. Central Information Commission Delhi High Court judgement dated 12.1.2010 – Secy. General, Supreme Court of India Vs. S.C. Agarwal Delhi High Court judgement dated 16.4.2009 – Union of India (Passport Office) Vs. CIC & Ors Bombay High Court Judgement dated 03.04.2008 – WP No.419 of 2007 – Dr. Celsa Pinto, Panaji Vs. Goa State Information Commission

———

Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. However, in case you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info@dtf.in.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.0/5 (477 votes cast)

Selected Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC)

More: * Latest DOPT / CVC / RTI / MOF / CGHS / DPE / RBI / IRDA Circulars / Orders; News * Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise * Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise * Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise * RTI – Rules/Notifications/Orders/Guidelines/Circulars * Right to Information Circulars/Orders (Subject-Wise)/Decisions RTI – Court judgements 
———————————————————————

I. CIC DECISIONS (From 01.07.2011 Onwards)
II. CIC DECISIONS (Full Bench)

SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS/POSTS
* CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi - The Commission directed the PIO/DTTE to inform the reasons for delay in giving the appellant the selection grade and also provide complete correspondence between the respondent and the DTTE within 15 days The Commission also directed to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for not giving complete information to the appellant. (Disclosure of Reasons)
* CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi – CIC: “Hence, the Commission holds that there is a larger public interest that require disclosure of medical records of a patient as mandated under Section 8(1)(j) and directs the respondent authority to furnish the information about the medical records of her husband to the extent ….” (Sections 2,3,4,6(2),7,8,11,18,19, Right to Privacy, Larger Public Interest)
CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai – The Commission directed the FAA, Life Insurance Corporation to issue instructions to all the Divisional Offices for charging correct premium in this regard under intimation to the Commission.
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon – The Commission directed the department to compensate the appellant by an amount of Rs.1000/- for the inconvenience and detriment caused to him. [Section 19(8)(b)].
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla – The basic protection afforded by virtue of the exemption from disclosure enacted under Section 8(1)(j) cannot be lifted or disturbed unless the petitioner is able to justify how such disclosure would be in ‘public interest’. [Section 8(1)(j)]
* DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding
* Office of the Attorney General of India is a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. –  Delhi High Court Judgment dated 10.03.2015 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Office of Attorney General and R.K. Jain Vs. Office of Attorney General of India
* CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi -  The Department of Posts has been requested to look into the issue and take appropriate steps to provide access to PIN code to prisoners lodged in various jails. (Larger Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (Non-Disclosure Agreement, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (Voluminous Records, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi [Section 5(4)] * CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi - The Commission directed the CPIO of MoEF to, inter alia, perform their obligation under Section 4(1)(c) and 4(1)(d) of RTI Act, 2005, and to furnish the reasons for formulating the policy of not imposing any restrictions and instead permitting the DDA to go ahead with unrestricted installation of Mobile Towers in the lands of DDA, in spite of recommendations against. The Commission also recommended the Chief Minister’s Office and office of Lieutenant Governor to probe into the reasons for ignoring these vital reports and their recommendations about the adverse effects of EMF from Mobile Towers and also to inform the people as to what measures they would initiate in response to the recommendations of the Inter Ministerial Group or if they have rejected the recommendation, the reasons and grounds for the same. (Sections 4(1)(c)&(d)/Disclosure of Reasons) * CIC Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi - “The Commission directed the respondent authority to furnish information to the appellant as to the reasons for denial of Selection Grade to him as they are bound to give the same under Section 4(1)(c.) …” (Section 4(1)(c)/Disclosure of Reasons) * O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of  >>> RTI – Rules/Circulars
*
Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) - “The Commission reiterates that the Bar Council of Delhi should initiate proceedings against the complainant for alleged misconduct of sending a blank paper as RTI application and causing wastage of public money and time of Public Authority.” (Misuse of RTI/Action against Complainant)Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi – “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to obtain the information from the Society and furnish the same to the Complainant within thirty days of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission, therefore, directs the respondent authority to inquire into the complaint of the complainant and provide the action taken report on the same within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi “The Commission also advises the appellant not to file repeated RTI applications which are aimless and useless. The Commission also advises the respondent authority not to share any personal information of the officers with the people like the appellant without invoking Section 11 of the RTI Act.” (Abuse of RTI) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi - “The CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant copies of such agreements, if available on the records of the public authority, by severing any information of a personal nature concerning the advocates, such as their personal address, bank account and income tax details etc., under Section 10 of the RTI Act.” [Section 10] * CIC Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai - The Commission cautioned the FAA to strictly follow the RTI regime while disposing of appeals and pass a speaking order, after taking due cognizance of merits of each case. * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi - “… names, addresses and phone nos./email addresses of all plaintiffs cannot be provided to the appellant as the same is third party information u/s 8(1)(j), the disclosure of which serves no larger public interest. … .. the appellant has neither suffered any detriment nor is there any public interest in seeking the information. Therefore, his plea for award of compensation is not accepted.” * Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore - “The appellant has not succeeded in demonstrating that the information asked for by him is in larger public interest. It being so, there is no need to interfere with the respondent’s decision.” [Section 8(1)(j)] * CIC Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi - “… the candidate with regard to his/her own answer sheet can obtain the copy of the same as a matter of right, but with regard to the answer sheet of third party, unless the candidate is able to show that large public interest is involved, the same cannot be furnished unless the candidate from whom it is sought for permits the same.” The Commission, therefore, directed to follow the procedure for supplying third party information U/S 11 of RTI Act, by seeking the opinion of the third party and taking a final decision by the PIO in this respect. [Sections 3, 8(1)(j), 11 and 19(3)]  * CIC Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission require the Chief Secretary of Delhi and Union Cabinet Secretary to disclose their policy on this issue under Section 4 of Right to Information Act and also inform the appellants about their proposed steps to implement recommendation of Lokayuktha of Delhi in effectively preventing photo publicity of the political rulers.” * CIC Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal, New Delhi - The Commission recommended change of officer to be designated as FAA. * CIC Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi [Sections 7(9), 18 & 20)] * CIC  Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi - The CIC has directed the Law Ministry to disclose the Cabinet note about the decision to establish a National Judicial Appointments Commission, saying that such documents are not secret and should thus be made public. * CIC Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain [Sections 8(1)(e), 8(1)(j)] * Delhi HC Judgement dated 04.12.2014 – The Registrar, Supreme Court of India Vs. Commodore Lokesh K. Batra and Ors. - Hon’ble Delhi High Court: “I find no infirmity with the impugned order in so far as it directs that the records may be maintained in a manner so that the information regarding the period for which the judgments are pending after being reserved, is available with the petitioner in future.” [Sections 4(1)(b), 7(9) and 19(8)(a)(iv)] * CIC Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi - CIC: “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to conduct an inquiry u/s 18(2) of the RTI Act to find out reasons and officer responsible for delay in payment of remuneration to the Appellant for nearly three years, for initiating disciplinary action against such officer. …” * CIC Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi - CIC: “The Appellate Authority is cautioned not to dismiss any appeals without reading the contents of the appeals or hearing the parties.” * Decision dated 12.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi – “Passing orders in first appeal without hearing or sending hearing notice is illegal and will render the order invalid. The Commission sets aside the order of First Appellate Authority for violating RTI Act and breach of natural justice by denying the appellant a chance of presenting his case and by raising entirely a new defence which was never claimed. Commission finds it deserves action though the concerned officer retired from service and recommends Public Authority to initiate disciplinary action against the concerned FAO for acting totally against the RTI Act in this case.” “… the respondents consider possibility of facilitating inspection before invoking Section 7(9) of RTI Act.” * Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board - “The Commission … … recommends the Public Authority to treat the RTI application as a complaint and as a regulatory initiate action against the persons who had installed nonfunctioning meters.” * Madras High Court Judgement dated 17.09.2014 – PIO-Registrar (Admn.), High Court, Madras Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi & another - “… … the first respondent-Commission clearly erred in passing the impugned order in this Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to furnish the details to the second respondent as well as sending a tabular statement listing all the complaints and representations received from the second respondent.” * Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi – “The Commission recommends the respondent authority to prepare a consolidated report of the appellant’s RTI applications and upload the same in their website, showing it as a case of misuse of RTI.” * Decision dated 25.06.2014 – Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi - CIC advised the DOPT the framing of the guidelines for prevention of abuse of the RTI Act, 2005 * Decision dated 19.06.2014 – Lt. Gen. S.S. Dahiya (Retd.) Vs. CPIO, Appellate Authority, Air Hqrs., Vayu Bhawan, New Delhi - Air Force Sports Complex is a Public Authority under the RTI Act, 2005. Decision dated 21.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara - The mere pendency of investigation is not sufficient justification by itself for withholding the information.” Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Hardeep Singh Sawhney Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi - Additional information can not be sought at the appeal stage. * Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Dipak J. Gandhi Vs. Supreme Court The public authority is not bound to compile information as per the format of the applicant. * Delhi High Court Judgement dated 20.02.2014 – Union of India Vs. Praveen Gupta - The impugned order dated 13th October, 2011 imposing penalty on the PIO was set aside. * Decision dated 07.01.2014 – Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi - CIC: Wife has right to know husband’s salary. * Decision dated 24.12.2013 – First Appellate Authority (RTI), PAO (Ors), BEG, Roorkee, UttarakhandBroad outcome of investigation into tax evasion complaint to be disclosed * Delhi High Court Judgement dated 08.11.2013 – UPSC Vs. Pinki Ganeriwal  - Sections 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005 * Delhi HC Judgement dated 28.10.2013 – J.K. Mittal Vs. Central Information Commission and Anr.  – Section 18 – Hon’ble Delhi High Court has decided: “… it is expected that the Commission henceforth will decide the complaints on merits instead of directing the CPIO to provide the information which the complainant had sought.” * Delhi High Court Judgement dated 31.10.2013 – Union of India Vs. Anita Singh - Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005 * Decision dated 14.10.2013 – Shri Rakesh Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. Transport Department (GNCT), Delhi - CIC has imposed the maximum penalty of Rs.25,000/- on the CPIO and has also recommended disciplinary action. SC Judgment dated 07.10.2013 – Thalappan Ser. Coop. Bank Ltd. and others Vs. State of Kerala and othersCooperative Societies not covered under the RTI Act * Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgement dated 02.11.2012 – Fruit & Merchant Union Vs. Chief Information Commissioner and others“…it should be ensured that the applicant files his proof of identity along with the application.”

I. CIC DECISIONS (From 01.07.2011 Onwards)

(a) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.01.2015 Onwards), (b) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2014 To 31.12.2014), (c) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.01.2014 To 30.09.2014), (d) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2013 To 31.12.2013), (e) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2013 To 30.09.2013), (f) CIC DECISIONS (From 15.02.2013 To 30.06.2013), (g) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2012 To 15.10.2012), (h) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2012 To 30.09.2012), (i) CIC DECISIONS (01.04.2012 To 30.06.2012), (j) CIC DECISIONS (01.01.2012 To 31.3.2012), (k) CIC DECISIONS (01.10.2011 To 31.12.2011), (l) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2011 to 30.09.2011)

(a) CIC Decisions (From 01.01.2015 Onwards)

  CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi (249.7 KiB, 16 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 39 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon (44.1 KiB, 47 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla (44.9 KiB, 58 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi (47.6 KiB, 89 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 125 hits)

  Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 126 hits)

  Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi (128.6 KiB, 106 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 76 hits)

  Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi (258.2 KiB, 188 hits)

  Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) (350.5 KiB, 149 hits)

  Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (253.0 KiB, 134 hits)

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi (352.1 KiB, 163 hits)

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi (352.4 KiB, 204 hits)

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 171 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi (54.2 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 102 hits)

  Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 94 hits)

  Decision dated 15.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Gurmeet Singh, Kanpur Vs. CGHS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (122.8 KiB, 21 hits)

  Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 127 hits)

  Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 88 hits)

  Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi (474.1 KiB, 118 hits)

  Decision dated 02.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal Vs. PIO, Dy. Land & Development Officer, Min. of Urban Development, New Delhi (45.4 KiB, 37 hits)

  Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 44 hits)

(b) CIC Decisions (From 01.10.2014 To 31.12.2014)

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 19.12.2014 – Shri Jai Prakash Deep Vs. CPIO, India Oil Corporation Ltd., Bhopal (331.9 KiB, 35 hits)

  Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 30 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 57 hits)

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Satinder Nath Sood Vs. CPIO, United Bank of India Regional Office, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 40 hits)

  Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 188 hits)

  Decision dated 26.11.2014 – Shri Rohit Sabharwal Vs. Delhi Fire Service, GNCTD, Delhi (334.1 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Shri V.K. Jha Vs. Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (317.5 KiB, 27 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 47 hits)

  Decision dated 12.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (433.5 KiB, 91 hits)

  Decision dated 05.11.2014 – Sardar Ranjit Singh, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (309.5 KiB, 32 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 54 hits)

  Decision dated 22.10.2014 – Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 17.10.2014 – Shri M.K. Gupta, Delhi Vs. PIO, Jt. Dir. (Gr.Cell), CGHS, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 45 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board (208.1 KiB, 206 hits)

(c) CIC Decisions (From 01.01.2014 To 30.09.2014) 

  Decision dated 16.09.2014 – Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Delhi & Distt. Cricket Association, Land & Development Officer, Min. of UD, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (86.4 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 302 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Farhat Ali Khan, Banda, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad UP Gramin Bank, Banda, UP (207.0 KiB, 82 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Ashutosh Pandey, Bhopal Vs. UPSC, New Delhi (74.4 KiB, 71 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Sudhir Goyal, Dehradun Vs. PMO, New Delhi (129.0 KiB, 95 hits)

  Decision dated 25.06.2014 – Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi (450.2 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 19.06.2014 – Lt. Gen. S.S. Dahiya (Retd.) Vs. CPIO, Appellate Authority, Air Hqrs., Vayu Bhawan, New Delhi (231.6 KiB, 190 hits)

  Decision dated 09.06.2014 – Smt. Walia Nasreen, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi (295.2 KiB, 87 hits)

  Decision dated 05.06.2014 – Mr. S.P. Dogra, Ambala Cantt. Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Deptt. of Posts, Ambala (67.5 KiB, 96 hits)

  Decision dated 23.05.2014 – Ms. Meenu Kumari Vs. Delhi State Service Selection Board, Delhi (256.9 KiB, 99 hits)

  Decision dated 21.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara (63.0 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri K.P. Singh Vs. U.P.S.C., New Delhi (199.4 KiB, 126 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Hardeep Singh Sawhney Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi (198.6 KiB, 357 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 12.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Hasmukhbai Maganbhai, Godhdra Vs. Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhra (64.5 KiB, 74 hits)

  Decision dated 05.05.2014 – Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 147 hits)

  Decision dated 02.05.2014 – Shri Gaikwad Shahurao Vishwanthrao, Parbhani, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Nanded, Maharashtra (210.2 KiB, 107 hits)

  Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Dipak J. Gandhi Vs. Supreme Court (52.2 KiB, 489 hits)

  Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Rakesh Gupta Vs. Kendriya Bhandar (216.9 KiB, 171 hits)

  Decision dated 17.04.2014 – Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 120 hits)

  Decision dated 16.04.2014 – Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 114 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 232 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Mr. S. Dhanabalan, Veppur, Perambalur District Vs. CPIO, Office of Postmaster General, Tiruchirapalli (47.9 KiB, 96 hits)

  Decision dated 12.03.2014 – Shri Omprakash Kashiram Vs. Prime Minister’s Office (209.9 KiB, 208 hits)

  Decision dated 12.03.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. U.P.S.C. (69.6 KiB, 83 hits)

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 139 hits)

  Decision dated 19.02.2014 – Mr. Anand Mohan Vs. Deptt. of Admn. Reforms & PG Grievances (64.1 KiB, 109 hits)

  Decision dated 18.02.2014 – Pramod Ganpat Sawant Vs. DOP&T, New Delhi (395.6 KiB, 181 hits)

  Decision dated 13.02.2014 – R.K. Prasad Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (317.1 KiB, 157 hits)

  Decision dated 11.02.2014 – Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 223 hits)

  Decision dated 29.01.2014 – Shri Bhagwan Chand Saxena Vs. Export Inspection Council of India (213.0 KiB, 112 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Shri Girish Nautiyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (200.5 KiB, 214 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 16.01.2014 – Ms. Surekha K.J., Kolkata Vs. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (240.6 KiB, 146 hits)

  Decision dated 09.01.2014 – Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 176 hits)

  Decision dated 07.01.2014 – Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi (322.2 KiB, 529 hits)

  Decision dated 07.01.2014 – Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Coal (106.9 KiB, 304 hits)

(d) CIC Decisions (From 01.10.2013 To 31.12.2013)

  Decision dated 24.12.2013 – First Appellate Authority (RTI), PAO (Ors), BEG, Roorkee, Uttarakhand (103.9 KiB, 245 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2013 – Shri D. Selvaraj, Namakkal Vs. Income Tax Officer & DIT, Chennai (241.8 KiB, 107 hits)

  Decision dated 03.12.2013 – Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 233 hits)

  Decision dated 22.11.2013 – Shri Rambir Singh, New Delhi Vs. Office of Additional District Magisrate, GNCT, New Delhi (93.8 KiB, 113 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Harkrishan Das Nijhawan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (96.5 KiB, 144 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 11.11.2013 – Dr. Rajiv Bhandari, Panchkula Vs. Office of the Director of Higher Education, UT, Chandigarh (93.4 KiB, 113 hits)

  Decision dated 07.11.2013 – Smt. Tapati Bhattacharjee Vs. Office of Dy. Conservator of Forests, Port Blair (95.2 KiB, 139 hits)

  Decision dated 23.10.2013 – Shri V.K. Pandey, Kolkata Vs. LIC of India, Kolkata (91.7 KiB, 239 hits)

  Decision dated 15.10.2013 – Shri Deepak Khullar, New Delhi Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (91.3 KiB, 127 hits)

  Decision dated 14.10.2013 – Shri Rakesh Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. Transport Department (GNCT), Delhi (305.7 KiB, 264 hits)

  Decision dated 08.10.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (95.7 KiB, 226 hits)

(e) CIC Decisions (From 01.07.2013 To 30.09.2013) 

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 17.09.2013 – Shri Amanullah Khan, Pune Vs. Tax Recovery Officer & AO, Pune (240.1 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 04.09.2013 – Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 299 hits)

  Decision dated 27.08.2013 – Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (Full Bench Decision) (63.1 KiB, 384 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur (UP) Vs. US, Staff Selection Committee, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 140 hits)

  Decision dated 14.08.2013 – Shri K. Madhavan, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 227 hits)

  Decision dated 12.08.2013 – Shri M.Yogeshwar Raj Vs. Air India (211.1 KiB, 200 hits)

  Decision dated 07.08.2013 – Shri Balbeer Krishan Arora, Farukhabad Vs. CPIO, Office of AG-I, Uttar Pradesh (207.8 KiB, 122 hits)

  Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) (403.9 KiB, 338 hits)

  Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Shri S. Joseph Balasundar, Chennai Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 209 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Dr. K. Padma Priya, Asstt. Professor, JNTU College of Engg., Pulivendula, A.P. Vs. FAA, AICTE, New Delhi (104.6 KiB, 130 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2013 – Shri S.S. Upathyaya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, The Ahoka Hotel, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi (211.5 KiB, 119 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2013 – Shri Kuldeep Yadav, Beri, Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana Vs. CPIO, Institute of Hotel Management, Pusa, New Delhi (208.1 KiB, 110 hits)

  Decision dated 24.07.2013 – Shri S.A.A. Abbasi, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 140 hits)

  Decision dated 24.07.2013 – Shri Ashish Ranjan, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (210.9 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 22.07.2013 – Shri Vishwas Bharmburkar, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi (208.8 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 19.07.2013 – Shri L.V. Raju Vs. Northern Coalfields Ltd. (215.4 KiB, 123 hits)

  Decision dated 18.07.2013 – Shri Ashok Kumar Joshi Vs. ITI Ltd., Gonda (201.7 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2013 – Dr. S. Chellappa, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, CBI, Hyderabad (209.9 KiB, 153 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2013 – Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 10.07.2013 – Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 312 hits)

  Decision dated 08.07.2013 – Shri Amarjit Sen, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 131 hits)

  Decision dated 08.07.2013 – Dr. Jitendra Nath Gupta, Delhi Vs. Coordinating Officer, Monitoring Committee, Supreme Court, New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 05.07.2013 – Shri B.Bharathi, Puducherry Vs. PIO, Madras High Court, Chennai (306.4 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 05.07.2013 – Shri Jayant Rakshit, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata (207.3 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 04.07.2013 – Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 453 hits)

(f) CIC Decisions (From 15.02.2013 To 30.06.2013) 

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Satya Prakash Mishra, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow (207.2 KiB, 116 hits)

  Decision dated 14.06.2013 – Shri Shyam Sunder Singh Vs. National Human Rights Commission (198.7 KiB, 224 hits)

  Decision dated 14.06.2013 – Shri V.N. Mathur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District (213.0 KiB, 166 hits)

  Decision dated 13.06.2013 – Shri Kamal Sharma, Agra Vs. ACIT, Kanpur (64.6 KiB, 178 hits)

  Decision dated 03.06.2013 – Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 494 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Shri Pradip Shankar Choughule Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (221.5 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Shri Sanjay Badekar, Mumbai Vs. LIC of India, Mumbai (91.3 KiB, 131 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Mr. M. Vellaipandi, STQC IT Centre, Chennai Vs. CPOI & Director, STQC Dte. under Min. of Comm. & IT, New Delhi (53.8 KiB, 160 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) (108.3 KiB, 170 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (52.3 KiB, 145 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Bhanu Pratap, Moradabad Vs. US & CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 10.05.2013 – Ms. Medha Rani, Chandigarh Vs. CPI, CBI, Chandigarh (208.2 KiB, 194 hits)

  Decision dated 09.05.2013 – Shri J.S. Singhal, ASW(E), AIR, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (207.6 KiB, 132 hits)

  Decision dated 08.05.2013 – Shri S. Kumar Minz, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, All India Radio, Patna (210.0 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 07.05.2013 – Shri P.S. Jadon, Lok Vihar Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 07.05.2013 – Shri Natraj Saha, Birbhum Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.1 KiB, 104 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur, UP Vs. CPIO, SSC, Allahabad (304.1 KiB, 169 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Ajit Kumar, Patna Vs. Dy. Director, SSC, Allahabad (213.1 KiB, 148 hits)

  Decision dated 29.04.2013 – Shri Nitesh Kumar Tripathy, JNU, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, President’ Sectt., New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 159 hits)

  Decision dated 26.04.2013 – Shri Jagjit Singh, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 12.04.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak Vs. Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 222 hits)

  Decision dated 12.04.2013 – Shri Harishankar Tiwari Vs. Minsitry of Law & Justice, New Delhi (194.1 KiB, 214 hits)

  Decision dated 11.04.2013 – Shri R.P. Pandeya, New Delhi Vs. CBDT, New Delhi (68.5 KiB, 178 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R. Govindarajan, Tirrupur Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.2 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 270 hits)

  Decision dated 15.03.2013 – Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 20.02.2013 – Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (123.9 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 19.02.2013 – Shri Rishipal Singh, Distt. Haridwar, Uttarakhand vs. ITO(Inv.)(HQ) & Addl. Director of IT (Inv.), Lucknow (74.3 KiB, 101 hits)

  Decision dated 19.02.2013 – Shri Rishipal Singh, Distt. Haridwar, Uttarakhand vs. ITO(Inv.)(HQ) & Addl. Director of IT (Inv.), Lucknow (74.3 KiB, 142 hits)

  Decision dated 15.02.2013 – Shri Ajay Pal, Bawal, Rewari, Haryana Vs. Under Secretary, SSC, New Delhi (303.8 KiB, 160 hits)

  Decision dated 15.02.2013 – Shri Ajay Kumar Sharma, Indira Enclave, P.O. Mehubala, Dehradun Vs. CPIO, Office of the Principal AG (Audit), Uttarakhand, Dehradun (207.1 KiB, 150 hits)

(g) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2012 To 15.10.2012) 

  Decision dated 10.10.2012 – Shri Manish Kumar, Varanasi Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (87.4 KiB, 157 hits)

  Decision dated 09.10.2012 – Shri Shankar Chandra Das Gupta, Kolkata Vs. IRDA, Hyderabad (443.5 KiB, 172 hits)

  Decision dated 08.10.2012 – Shri Madhav B. Karmakar Vs. Deptt. of Financial Services, New Delhi (87.7 KiB, 150 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2012 – Shri Partha Mandal, Delhi Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 150 hits)

(h) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2012 To 30.09.2012) 

  Decision dated 28.09.2012 – Shri Shiv Shankar Tiwari, Faridabad Vs. DOPT, New Delhi (331.0 KiB, 153 hits)

  Decision dated 14.09.2012 – Shri Mohinder Singh Sidhu Vs. Dte. Gen. of Vigilance, Customs & Excise, New Delhi (195.6 KiB, 216 hits)

  Decision dated 12.09.2012 – Shri M. Shiva Shankar, Hyderabad Vs. LIC of India, Hyderabad (86.9 KiB, 154 hits)

  Decision dated 12.09.2012 – Shri Sunil Kumar, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 165 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Ministry of Law & Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (195.3 KiB, 212 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Ravi Malpani, Ratlam, M.P. Vs. SSC, New Delhi (204.9 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 21.08.2012 – Shri B.D. Gupta Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (239.6 KiB, 163 hits)

  Decision dated 21.08.2012 – Shri Harendra Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 195 hits)

  Decision dated 14.08.2012 – Shri Syed Idramudin, Nizamabad Vs. Appellate Authority, Regional Passport Office, Secunderabad (331.0 KiB, 191 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri Prakash Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI (ACB), New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri K. Thankshinamurthy, Madurai Vs. CPIO, CBI, Chennai (206.7 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri Jagdish Prasad, Ranchi Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (204.8 KiB, 225 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri K. Nagraj, IPS, Tripura Vs. CPIO, New Delhi (209.3 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Ms. Manju, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 158 hits)

  Decision dated 30.07.2012 – Shri Manish Kumar Singh, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (306.3 KiB, 193 hits)

  Decision dated 30.07.2012 – Shri U.N.L. Das, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (206.1 KiB, 168 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

(i) CIC DECISIONS (01.04.2012 To 30.06.2012)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 258 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. A.K. Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO & Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (62.9 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Dr. Kamal Saini Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (195.8 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Shri J.K. Sharma Vs. Delhi Police (199.5 KiB, 198 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 01.06.2012 – Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 297 hits)

  Decision dated 01.06.2012 – Mr. S. Kandasamy, Manager, Pallavan Grama Bank, Irudhukottai, Tamilnadu Vs. PIO & GM, Pallavan Grama Bank, Salem, Tamilnadu (62.5 KiB, 246 hits)

  Decision dated 30.05.2012 – Mr. Tek Chand Kotwal, Rohini, Delhi Vs. PIO & RPO, Regional Passport Office, New Delhi (51.4 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 28.05.2012 – Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 304 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mrs. Shakuntala Jayant, Pandav Nagar, Delhi Vs. PIO, MCD, New Delhi (51.5 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Ramesh Sawant, Mumbai Vs. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai (89.8 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Dinbandhu Sarkar, National Library, Kolkata Vs. National Library, Kolkata (76.6 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. PIO & US, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (57.7 KiB, 164 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Amardeep Gulati, Shahdara, Delhi Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (53.0 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Shri Nitin Nayyar, Mohali Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (209.7 KiB, 216 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Shri D.P. Ojha, DGP (Retd.), Patna Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (207.6 KiB, 244 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2012 – Shri Vijay Gupta Vs. Delhi Police (216.0 KiB, 343 hits)

  Decision dated 30.04.2012 – Mr. Hassan Singh Mejie, Chandigarh Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (52.4 KiB, 177 hits)

  Decision dated 30.04.2012 – Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 268 hits)

  Decision dated 04.04.2012 – Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 410 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2012 – Shri Ram M. Apte, Balgaum Vs. CPIO, High Court of Karnakatak, Bangaluru (204.9 KiB, 353 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2012 – Shri Bindeshwar Shah, Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad (207.2 KiB, 200 hits)

(j) CIC DECISIONS (01.01.2012 To 31.3.2012)

  Decision dated 09.03.2012 – Shri Abhi Ghosh, Kolkata Vs. Air India Ltd., New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 09.03.2012 – Shri Ankur Mutreja, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Census Operations, New Delhi (213.3 KiB, 213 hits)

  Decision dated 07.03.2012 – Shri Kamaldev Thakur, East Champaran, Bihar Vs. Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Motihari, Bihar (297.8 KiB, 181 hits)

  Decision dated 06.03.2012 – Shri N. Srinivas, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, Chennai (298.2 KiB, 202 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri Gopal Singh, Distt. Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur (304.9 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri Manoranjan S. Roy, Mumbai Vs CPIO, Mumbai DRT No.2, Mumbai (302.0 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri S.P. Goyal Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (195.4 KiB, 305 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Dr. Gyan Prakash Mishra, Distt. Balia, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court, UP (303.3 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Shri R.D. Batra, Secy. Citizen Rights Association II, Ghaziabad, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court Court, UP (205.1 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Shri Arup K. Ghosh Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (237.6 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, Srinagar Vs. PIO & Program Executive, Prasar Bharti, Srinagar (48.2 KiB, 194 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Radhakrishnan B. Toshawara Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Surat-II (179.4 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 377 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Akshay Pant, Port Blair Vs. PIO, A&N Administration, Port Blair (60.6 KiB, 278 hits)

  Decision dated 19.01.2012 – Mr. Tarun Nag, Kolkata Vs. PIO, Central Drugs Laboratory, Kolkata (56.4 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 19.01.2012 – Mr. A.L. Makhijani, President, Forum for Good Governance, Delhi Vs. CMO, CGHS, New Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi (47.3 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 12.01.2012 – Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 271 hits)

  Decision dated 12.01.2012 – Shri D.K. Aggarwal, Moradabad Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (55.1 KiB, 210 hits)

(k) CIC DECISIONS (01.10.2011 To 31.12.2011)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. K. Karthirmathiyon, Secy., Coimbatore Consumer Cause, Coimbatore Vs. PIO & JS, Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.4 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 305 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. S.P. Goyal, Mumbai Vs. PIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (49.1 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Amritsar Vs. PIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Amritsar (57.3 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. R.C. Gupta, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. PIO & HOD, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi (48.3 KiB, 200 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 342 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Mr. Lakhpat Tanwar, Lab Oncology Unit, AIIMS, New Delhi Vs. PIO & AO, AIIMS, New Delhi (55.4 KiB, 124 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Mr. Sukhjit Singh Walia, Patiala Vs. PIO & Dir. (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (47.5 KiB, 237 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 – Shri Murlidhar, Patna Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (286.2 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 28.11.2011 – Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 221 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. Asstt. IG, Min. of Environment & Forest, New Delhi (90.6 KiB, 218 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 284 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Ramesh Kumar Anand, Steno., PGIMER, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, PGIMER, Chandigarh (44.6 KiB, 320 hits)

  Decision dated 11.11.2011 – Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & GM, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (70.2 KiB, 164 hits)

  Decision dated 09.11.2011 – Mr. Adishwar Jain Vs. Office of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (223.8 KiB, 187 hits)

  Decision dated 09.11.2011 – Mr. K.R. Basu, Tirunelveli-7 Vs. PIO & CGM, Indian Bank, Chennai (52.7 KiB, 283 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mrs. Ambika Sudhakaran, Palakkad, Kerala Vs. PIO, Bank of India, New Delhi (35.5 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Nemi Chand Jain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & DGM, United Bank of India, Guwahati (37.8 KiB, 212 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 322 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. G.B. Chandulal, Rajkot Vs. PIO & GM, Dena Bank, Mumbai (39.3 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 377 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2011 – Shri S. Mukherjee Vs. Eastern Coalfields, Dhanbad (455.6 KiB, 149 hits)

  Decision dated 02.11.2011 – Shri Suraj Prakash Bakshi, Delhi Vs. Public Grievances Commission, New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 160 hits)

  Decision dated 02.11.2011 – Shri Ved Prakash Singhal, Nangloi Vs. Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (207.3 KiB, 231 hits)

  Decision dated 31.10.2011 – Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 231 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 295 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 317 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 337 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 397 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Sh. D.K. Pandey, Jamshedpur Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Ranchi (62.6 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Sh. D.K. Bindra, New Delhi Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 212 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 344 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. K.G. Krishnamoorthy, Mayiladuthari Vs. PIO, Indian Bank, Chennai (55.4 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. CPIO & General Manager, RBI, Mumbai (71.8 KiB, 326 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2011 – Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) Vs. Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Full Bench Decision) (70.8 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. L.S.R. Murthy, Hyderabad Vs. PIO&AGM, UCO Bank, Hyderabad (47.1 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Chandrakant C. Anandpara, Chairman, Consumer Care Forum, Mumbai Vs. PIO, Bank of India, Walkeshwar Branch, Mumbai (48.1 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 324 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 303 hits)

(l) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2011 to 30.09.2011)

  Decision dated 30.09..2011 – Shri Vikas Patel, Gandhidham Vs. Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust (rep. through Shri K.L. Sache, Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust) (342.3 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 29.09..2011 – Mr. P.P. Kapoor Vs. Deptt. of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (216.7 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 29.09.2011 – Mr. G. Ramesh Reddy, Kurnool, AP Vs. CPIO, CGM, NABARD, Hyderabad (47.3 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 28.09.2011 – Mr. Nitesh Kumar Tripathi, Saifai Etawah, UP Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (34.6 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. Ankur Goyal, JNU, New Delhi Vs. JS, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (76.8 KiB, 286 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. L.C. Sonewane, Bhilai Vs. CPIO & CGM, RBI, Mumbai (103.1 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Shri D.M. Jotania, Nav Mumbai Vs. Central Railway, Divisional Manager’s Office, Mumbai (210.5 KiB, 176 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Sh. Jitendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. Min. of Home Affairs, New Delhi (613.7 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Mr. H.G. Prabhu, Karkala Vs. PIO&DGM, Corporation Bank, Mangalore (39.8 KiB, 248 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Mr. H.S. Kasabe, Dresser, CGHS, Mumbai Vs. PIO & CMO, CGHS, Mumbai (48.2 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Mr. Suresh Kumar Verma, Balrampur, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Kandaula Branch, UP (42.4 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Shri S. Saravanan Vs. NHAI, New Delhi (182.8 KiB, 190 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Smt. Hazra Bee Vs. Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, New Delhi (231.2 KiB, 217 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Ms. Rekha Makharia, Mumbai Vs. PIO (Law) & Company Secy., IDBI Bank Ltd., Mumbai (48.4 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mrs. Mary V. Abraham, Engg. College, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. PIO & Director, ISRO, Bangalore (62.7 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 207 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Ms. Kiran Mehtra, Chandigarh Vs. PIO & Rergistrar-cum-Secretary, Central Council of Homeopathy, New Delhi (191.1 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Vijay Narayana Rai, Bikaner Vs. CPIO, Dte. General of All India Radio, New Delhi (47.4 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Deepak Bhalla, Paharganj, New Delhi Vs. PIO, Embassy of India, The Netherlands and DS (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (187.1 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. A.M. Attar, Mumbai Vs. PIO & GZM, Bank of India, Mumbai (181.1 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 01.09.2011 – Shri N.R. Choudhary, Gurgaon Vs. Min. of Railways, New Delhi (212.8 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 01.09.2011 – Smt. Neena, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 327 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Mohit Paul, New Delhi Vs. PIO&DGM, Bank of India, Mumbai (59.3 KiB, 458 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 221 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. D.K. Bhaumik, Kolkata Vs. CPIO & GM, SIDBI, Lucknow (68.3 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Delhi Vs. PIO&Supdg. Engineer, MCD, New Delhi (44.7 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 24.08.2011 – Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (206.6 KiB, 170 hits)

  Decision dated 11.08.2011 – Shri Ajay Hariharno, Durg Vs. SBI, Bhopal (128.2 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 10.08.2011 – Mr. G.M. Parray, Srinagar Vs. PIO, DG, Doordarshan, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Shri R.K. Jain Vs. CBEC, New Delhi (352.9 KiB, 329 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 476 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2011 – Ms. Mini Sharma, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO & US, SSC, New Delhi (48.3 KiB, 347 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2011 – Mr. Mahinder Singh, AD, ESIC, New Delhi Vs. PIO, ESIC, Indore (57.9 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 07.07.2011 – Mr. G.D. Gupta Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (45.3 KiB, 158 hits)

  Decision dated 07.07.2011 – Mr. Ashok Lalchandani, New Delhi Vs. Mr. M.L. Gupta, PIO&AR (East), RCS, New Delhi (47.0 KiB, 171 hits)

  Decision dated 07.07.2011 – Mr. Krishnanand Tripathi, Sr. Correspondent, Live India, New Delhi Vs. Mr. Anil Palta, CPIO&DIG, CBI, New Delhi (142.5 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 07.07.2011 – Mr. Krishnanand Tripathi, Sr. Correspondent, Live India, New Delhi Vs. Mr. Anil Palta, CPIO&DIG, CBI, CBI HQ, New Delhi (142.5 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2011 – Mr. Binoy Gupta, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Revenue & CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (57.0 KiB, 277 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2011 – Mr. Ram Prasad Mahato, Distt. Madhubani, Bihar Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, Darbhanga (47.7 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 04.07.2011 – Mr. S.S. Ranawat, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) Vs. CPIO & SSP (HQ), CBI, New Delhi (102.1 KiB, 263 hits)

  Decision dated 01.07.2011 – Mr. Justice R.N. Mishra (Retired), Allahabad Vs. PIO&Head of Branch, CBI, ACB, Ghaziabad (114.6 KiB, 176 hits)

Important Decisions of CIC Compiled by ISTM, New Delhi (July, 2010)

  Important Decisions of CIC Compiled by ISTM, New Delhi (July, 2010) (3.5 MiB, 207 hits)

II. CIC Decisions (Full Bench) IFFCO is not a Public Authority

  Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) (403.9 KiB, 338 hits)

AWHO is a Pubic Authority

  Decision dated 04.07.2013 – Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 453 hits)

Others

  Decision dated 03.06.2013 – Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 494 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) (108.3 KiB, 170 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (52.3 KiB, 145 hits)

  Decision dated 20.02.2013 – Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (123.9 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2011 – Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) Vs. Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Full Bench Decision) (70.8 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 327 hits)

  Decision dated 24.08.2011 – Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (206.6 KiB, 170 hits)

  Decision dated 31.01.2011 – Shri Z.U. Alvi Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI (Full Bench Decision) (79.9 KiB, 224 hits)

  Decision dated 15.10.2010 – Shri Shanmuga Patro Vs. Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (Full Bench Decision) (73.2 KiB, 223 hits)

  Decision dated 29.09.2010 – Brig. (Retd.) Ujjal Dasgupta (Dr. B. Malhotra-Representative Appellant) Vs. CDAC; Advocate for RAW, Director & CPIO, Cab. Sectt. (Full Bench Decision) (184.1 KiB, 235 hits)

  Decision dated 28.09.2010 – Shri V.R. Chandran Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (Full Bench Decision) (349.5 KiB, 263 hits)

  Decision dated 14.07.2010 – Ms. Bindu Khanna, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Education, GNCT, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (76.9 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 10.06.2010 – Shri Manohar, Shri J.K. Routray & Shri Gurbax Singh Vs. AGs of Goa, Orisaa and Punjab (362.4 KiB, 213 hits)

Go to Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise RTI – Court judgements

Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. However, in case you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info@dtf.in.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.0/5 (136 votes cast)

Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Section-Wise

More: * Latest DOPT / CVC / RTI / MOF / CGHS / DPE / RBI / IRDA Circulars / Orders; News * Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise * Selected Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) * RTI – Rules/Notifications/Orders/Guidelines/Circulars * RTI – Court judgements * Right to Information Circulars/Orders (Subject-Wise)/Decisions *  RTI News 

SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS/POSTS
* CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi - The Commission directed the PIO/DTTE to inform the reasons for delay in giving the appellant the selection grade and also provide complete correspondence between the respondent and the DTTE within 15 days The Commission also directed to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for not giving complete information to the appellant. (Disclosure of Reasons)
* CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi – CIC: “Hence, the Commission holds that there is a larger public interest that require disclosure of medical records of a patient as mandated under Section 8(1)(j) and directs the respondent authority to furnish the information about the medical records of her husband to the extent ….” (Sections 2,3,4,6(2),7,8,11,18,19, Right to Privacy, Larger Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai – The Commission directed the FAA, Life Insurance Corporation to issue instructions to all the Divisional Offices for charging correct premium in this regard under intimation to the Commission.
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon – The Commission directed the department to compensate the appellant by an amount of Rs.1000/- for the inconvenience and detriment caused to him. [Section 19(8)(b)].
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla – The basic protection afforded by virtue of the exemption from disclosure enacted under Section 8(1)(j) cannot be lifted or disturbed unless the petitioner is able to justify how such disclosure would be in ‘public interest’. [Section 8(1)(j)]
* DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding
* Office of the Attorney General of India is a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. –  Delhi High Court Judgment dated 10.03.2015 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Office of Attorney General and R.K. Jain Vs. Office of Attorney General of India * CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi -  The Department of Posts has been requested to look into the issue and take appropriate steps to provide access to PIN code to prisoners lodged in various jails. (Larger Public Interest) * CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (Non-Disclosure Agreement, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (Voluminous Records, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi [Section 5(4)] * CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi - The Commission directed the CPIO of MoEF to, inter alia, perform their obligation under Section 4(1)(c) and 4(1)(d) of RTI Act, 2005, and to furnish the reasons for formulating the policy of not imposing any restrictions and instead permitting the DDA to go ahead with unrestricted installation of Mobile Towers in the lands of DDA, in spite of recommendations against. The Commission also recommended the Chief Minister’s Office and office of Lieutenant Governor to probe into the reasons for ignoring these vital reports and their recommendations about the adverse effects of EMF from Mobile Towers and also to inform the people as to what measures they would initiate in response to the recommendations of the Inter Ministerial Group or if they have rejected the recommendation, the reasons and grounds for the same. (Sections 4(1)(c)&(d)/Disclosure of Reasons) * CIC Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi - “The Commission directed the respondent authority to furnish information to the appellant as to the reasons for denial of Selection Grade to him as they are bound to give the same under Section 4(1)(c.) …” (Section 4(1)(c)/Disclosure of Reasons) * O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of  >>> RTI – Rules/Circulars * Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) - “The Commission reiterates that the Bar Council of Delhi should initiate proceedings against the complainant for alleged misconduct of sending a blank paper as RTI application and causing wastage of public money and time of Public Authority.” (Misuse of RTI/Action against Complainant)Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi – “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to obtain the information from the Society and furnish the same to the Complainant within thirty days of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission, therefore, directs the respondent authority to inquire into the complaint of the complainant and provide the action taken report on the same within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi “The Commission also advises the appellant not to file repeated RTI applications which are aimless and useless. The Commission also advises the respondent authority not to share any personal information of the officers with the people like the appellant without invoking Section 11 of the RTI Act.” (Abuse of RTI) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi - “The CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant copies of such agreements, if available on the records of the public authority, by severing any information of a personal nature concerning the advocates, such as their personal address, bank account and income tax details etc., under Section 10 of the RTI Act.” [Section 10] * CIC Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai - The Commission cautioned the FAA to strictly follow the RTI regime while disposing of appeals and pass a speaking order, after taking due cognizance of merits of each case. * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi - “… names, addresses and phone nos./email addresses of all plaintiffs cannot be provided to the appellant as the same is third party information u/s 8(1)(j), the disclosure of which serves no larger public interest. … .. the appellant has neither suffered any detriment nor is there any public interest in seeking the information. Therefore, his plea for award of compensation is not accepted.” * Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore - “The appellant has not succeeded in demonstrating that the information asked for by him is in larger public interest. It being so, there is no need to interfere with the respondent’s decision.” [Section 8(1)(j)] * CIC Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi - “… the candidate with regard to his/her own answer sheet can obtain the copy of the same as a matter of right, but with regard to the answer sheet of third party, unless the candidate is able to show that large public interest is involved, the same cannot be furnished unless the candidate from whom it is sought for permits the same.” The Commission, therefore, directed to follow the procedure for supplying third party information U/S 11 of RTI Act, by seeking the opinion of the third party and taking a final decision by the PIO in this respect. [Sections 3, 8(1)(j), 11 and 19(3)]  * CIC Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission require the Chief Secretary of Delhi and Union Cabinet Secretary to disclose their policy on this issue under Section 4 of Right to Information Act and also inform the appellants about their proposed steps to implement recommendation of Lokayuktha of Delhi in effectively preventing photo publicity of the political rulers.” * CIC Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal, New Delhi - The Commission recommended change of officer to be designated as FAA. * CIC Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi [Sections 7(9), 18 & 20)] * Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi - The CIC has directed the Law Ministry to disclose the Cabinet note about the decision to establish a National Judicial Appointments Commission, saying that such documents are not secret and should thus be made public. * CIC Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain [Sections 8(1)(e), 8(1)(j)] * Delhi HC Judgement dated 04.12.2014 – The Registrar, Supreme Court of India Vs. Commodore Lokesh K. Batra and Ors. - Hon’ble Delhi High Court: “I find no infirmity with the impugned order in so far as it directs that the records may be maintained in a manner so that the information regarding the period for which the judgments are pending after being reserved, is available with the petitioner in future.” [Sections 4(1)(b), 7(9) and 19(8)(a)(iv)] * CIC Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi - CIC: “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to conduct an inquiry u/s 18(2) of the RTI Act to find out reasons and officer responsible for delay in payment of remuneration to the Appellant for nearly three years, for initiating disciplinary action against such officer. …” * CIC Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi - CIC: “The Appellate Authority is cautioned not to dismiss any appeals without reading the contents of the appeals or hearing the parties.” * CIC Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board - “The Commission … … recommends the Public Authority to treat the RTI application as a complaint and as a regulatory initiate action against the persons who had installed nonfunctioning meters.” * Madras High Court Judgement dated 17.09.2014 – PIO-Registrar (Admn.), High Court, Madras Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi & another - “… … the first respondent-Commission clearly erred in passing the impugned order in this Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to furnish the details to the second respondent as well as sending a tabular statement listing all the complaints and representations received from the second respondent.” * Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi – “The Commission recommends the respondent authority to prepare a consolidated report of the appellant’s RTI applications and upload the same in their website, showing it as a case of misuse of RTI.”
SECTION-WISE DECISIONS * Section 2 * Section 3 * Section 4 * Section 5 * Section 6 * Sections 7(6) and 7(9) * Sections 8 * Section 10 * Section 11 * Section 18 * Section 19 * Section 20 * Section 22 * Section 24 * Section 25

Go to SUBJECT-WISE DECISIONS

Updated on 22.04.2015

SECTION-WISE DECISIONS

Section 2

Section 2(f) – Definition of ‘information’ 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 12.03.2014 – Shri Omprakash Kashiram Vs. Prime Minister’s Office (209.9 KiB, 208 hits)

  Decision dated 18.02.2014 – Pramod Ganpat Sawant Vs. DOP&T, New Delhi (395.6 KiB, 181 hits)

  Decision dated 13.02.2014 – R.K. Prasad Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (317.1 KiB, 157 hits)

  Decision dated 23.10.2013 – Shri V.K. Pandey, Kolkata Vs. LIC of India, Kolkata (91.7 KiB, 239 hits)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 04.09.2013 – Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 299 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 14.08.2013 – Shri K. Madhavan, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 227 hits)

  Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Shri S. Joseph Balasundar, Chennai Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 209 hits)

  Decision dated 05.07.2013 – Shri B.Bharathi, Puducherry Vs. PIO, Madras High Court, Chennai (306.4 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 14.06.2013 – Shri Shyam Sunder Singh Vs. National Human Rights Commission (198.7 KiB, 224 hits)

  Decision dated 10.05.2013 – Ms. Medha Rani, Chandigarh Vs. CPI, CBI, Chandigarh (208.2 KiB, 194 hits)

  Decision dated 12.04.2013 – Shri Harishankar Tiwari Vs. Minsitry of Law & Justice, New Delhi (194.1 KiB, 214 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2012 – Shri Vijay Gupta Vs. Delhi Police (216.0 KiB, 343 hits)

  Decision dated 04.04.2012 – Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 410 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2012 – Shri Ram M. Apte, Balgaum Vs. CPIO, High Court of Karnakatak, Bangaluru (204.9 KiB, 353 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri S.P. Goyal Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (195.4 KiB, 305 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 397 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 344 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 476 hits)

— Section 2(h) – Definition of ‘Public Authority’

  Decision dated 19.06.2014 – Lt. Gen. S.S. Dahiya (Retd.) Vs. CPIO, Appellate Authority, Air Hqrs., Vayu Bhawan, New Delhi (231.6 KiB, 190 hits)

  Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) (403.9 KiB, 338 hits)

  Decision dated 04.07.2013 – Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 453 hits)

  Decision dated 03.06.2013 – Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 494 hits)

— PIO/CPIO Not Expected To Give Interpretation/Justification/Opinion

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Ramesh Kumar Anand, Steno., PGIMER, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, PGIMER, Chandigarh (44.6 KiB, 320 hits)

— Section 2(j) - Meaning of ‘Right to Information’ 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 39 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 125 hits)

  Decision dated 05.08.2013 – Shri S. Joseph Balasundar, Chennai Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 209 hits)

  Decision dated 05.07.2013 – Shri B.Bharathi, Puducherry Vs. PIO, Madras High Court, Chennai (306.4 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. CPIO & General Manager, RBI, Mumbai (71.8 KiB, 326 hits)

Section 3 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 94 hits)

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 40 hits)

  Decision dated 26.11.2014 – Shri Rohit Sabharwal Vs. Delhi Fire Service, GNCTD, Delhi (334.1 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Shri V.K. Jha Vs. Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (317.5 KiB, 27 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 47 hits)

  Decision dated 22.10.2014 – Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board (208.1 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 302 hits)

  Decision dated 23.05.2014 – Ms. Meenu Kumari Vs. Delhi State Service Selection Board, Delhi (256.9 KiB, 99 hits)

  Decision dated 17.04.2014 – Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 120 hits)

Section 4 – Obligations of public authorities

Section 4 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 94 hits)

  Decision dated 07.01.2014 – Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi (322.2 KiB, 529 hits)

  Decision dated 03.06.2013 – Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 494 hits)

  Decision dated 30.04.2012 – Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 268 hits)

  Decision dated 12.01.2012 – Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 271 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. Ankur Goyal, JNU, New Delhi Vs. JS, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (76.8 KiB, 286 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. D.K. Bhaumik, Kolkata Vs. CPIO & GM, SIDBI, Lucknow (68.3 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 476 hits)

Section 4(1)(b)

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 30 hits)

  Decision dated 25.06.2014 – Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi (450.2 KiB, 236 hits)

Section 4(1)(c)

  CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 76 hits)

  Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi (258.2 KiB, 188 hits)

Section 4(1)(d)

  CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 76 hits)

Section 5 (4)

  Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi (128.6 KiB, 106 hits)

  Decision dated 16.04.2014 – Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 114 hits)

Section 6Section 6(1)

  Decision dated 29.04.2013 – Shri Nitesh Kumar Tripathy, JNU, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, President’ Sectt., New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 159 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Chandrakant C. Anandpara, Chairman, Consumer Care Forum, Mumbai Vs. PIO, Bank of India, Walkeshwar Branch, Mumbai (48.1 KiB, 238 hits)

Section 6(2)

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 08.05.2013 – Shri S. Kumar Minz, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, All India Radio, Patna (210.0 KiB, 206 hits)

Section 6 (3) - Transfer of Application to Another Public Authority 

  Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 94 hits)

  Decision dated 02.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal Vs. PIO, Dy. Land & Development Officer, Min. of Urban Development, New Delhi (45.4 KiB, 37 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Sudhir Goyal, Dehradun Vs. PMO, New Delhi (129.0 KiB, 95 hits)

  Decision dated 04.09.2013 – Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 299 hits)

  Decision dated 10.07.2013 – Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 312 hits)

  Decision dated 08.07.2013 – Dr. Jitendra Nath Gupta, Delhi Vs. Coordinating Officer, Monitoring Committee, Supreme Court, New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 09.03.2012 – Shri Abhi Ghosh, Kolkata Vs. Air India Ltd., New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. L.S.R. Murthy, Hyderabad Vs. PIO&AGM, UCO Bank, Hyderabad (47.1 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 29.09..2011 – Mr. P.P. Kapoor Vs. Deptt. of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (216.7 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. L.C. Sonewane, Bhilai Vs. CPIO & CGM, RBI, Mumbai (103.1 KiB, 220 hits)

Section 7

Section 7

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

Section 7(1)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 258 hits)

Section 7(3)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

Section 7(6) – Providing the information free of cost

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 258 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. K. Karthirmathiyon, Secy., Coimbatore Consumer Cause, Coimbatore Vs. PIO & JS, Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.4 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. Asstt. IG, Min. of Environment & Forest, New Delhi (90.6 KiB, 218 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Nemi Chand Jain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & DGM, United Bank of India, Guwahati (37.8 KiB, 212 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 322 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. G.B. Chandulal, Rajkot Vs. PIO & GM, Dena Bank, Mumbai (39.3 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 31.10.2011 – Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 231 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 295 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 317 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 337 hits)

  Decision dated 29.09.2011 – Mr. G. Ramesh Reddy, Kurnool, AP Vs. CPIO, CGM, NABARD, Hyderabad (47.3 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. L.C. Sonewane, Bhilai Vs. CPIO & CGM, RBI, Mumbai (103.1 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 207 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. A.M. Attar, Mumbai Vs. PIO & GZM, Bank of India, Mumbai (181.1 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Mohit Paul, New Delhi Vs. PIO&DGM, Bank of India, Mumbai (59.3 KiB, 458 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 221 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. D.K. Bhaumik, Kolkata Vs. CPIO & GM, SIDBI, Lucknow (68.3 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Delhi Vs. PIO&Supdg. Engineer, MCD, New Delhi (44.7 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2011 – Mr. Mahinder Singh, AD, ESIC, New Delhi Vs. PIO, ESIC, Indore (57.9 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 07.07.2011 – Mr. Krishnanand Tripathi, Sr. Correspondent, Live India, New Delhi Vs. Mr. Anil Palta, CPIO&DIG, CBI, New Delhi (142.5 KiB, 257 hits)

— Section 7 (9) – Information to be provided in the form sought unless it would cause disproportional diversion of resources

  Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 126 hits)

  Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 88 hits)

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 19.12.2014 – Shri Jai Prakash Deep Vs. CPIO, India Oil Corporation Ltd., Bhopal (331.9 KiB, 35 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Dipak J. Gandhi Vs. Supreme Court (52.2 KiB, 489 hits)

  Decision dated 19.02.2014 – Mr. Anand Mohan Vs. Deptt. of Admn. Reforms & PG Grievances (64.1 KiB, 109 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Harkrishan Das Nijhawan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (96.5 KiB, 144 hits)

  Decision dated 14.06.2013 – Shri Shyam Sunder Singh Vs. National Human Rights Commission (198.7 KiB, 224 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Ministry of Law & Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (195.3 KiB, 212 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Ravi Malpani, Ratlam, M.P. Vs. SSC, New Delhi (204.9 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri Manoranjan S. Roy, Mumbai Vs CPIO, Mumbai DRT No.2, Mumbai (302.0 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. S.P. Goyal, Mumbai Vs. PIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (49.1 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 342 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. K.G. Krishnamoorthy, Mayiladuthari Vs. PIO, Indian Bank, Chennai (55.4 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Smt. Hazra Bee Vs. Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, New Delhi (231.2 KiB, 217 hits)

Sections 8 – Exemption from disclosure of information

— Section 8(1)

  Decision dated 05.05.2014 – Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 147 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. A.K. Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO & Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (62.9 KiB, 306 hits)

— Section 8(1)(a) – Information prejudicially affecting sovereignty/integrity of India, security/strategic/scientific/economic interests of the State, etc. 

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) (108.3 KiB, 170 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 305 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 377 hits)

— Section 8(1)(b)

  Decision dated 15.05.2012 – Shri Vijay Gupta Vs. Delhi Police (216.0 KiB, 343 hits)

  Decision dated 19.01.2012 – Mr. A.L. Makhijani, President, Forum for Good Governance, Delhi Vs. CMO, CGHS, New Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi (47.3 KiB, 249 hits)

— Section 8(1)(c)

  Decision dated 20.02.2013 – Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (123.9 KiB, 174 hits)

— Section 8(1)(d) -Commercial Confidence, Trade Secrets or Intellectual Property

  Decision dated 11.02.2014 – Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 223 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Shri Girish Nautiyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (200.5 KiB, 214 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 15.03.2013 – Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 09.10.2012 – Shri Shankar Chandra Das Gupta, Kolkata Vs. IRDA, Hyderabad (443.5 KiB, 172 hits)

  Decision dated 01.06.2012 – Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 297 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Shri Arup K. Ghosh Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (237.6 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 377 hits)

  Decision dated 09.11.2011 – Mr. K.R. Basu, Tirunelveli-7 Vs. PIO & CGM, Indian Bank, Chennai (52.7 KiB, 283 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Mr. H.G. Prabhu, Karkala Vs. PIO&DGM, Corporation Bank, Mangalore (39.8 KiB, 248 hits)

— Section 8(1)(e) – Fiduciary Relationship

  Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 05.11.2014 – Sardar Ranjit Singh, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (309.5 KiB, 32 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 54 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri K.P. Singh Vs. U.P.S.C., New Delhi (199.4 KiB, 126 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 16.01.2014 – Ms. Surekha K.J., Kolkata Vs. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (240.6 KiB, 146 hits)

  Decision dated 03.12.2013 – Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 233 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 04.09.2013 – Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 299 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 28.05.2012 – Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 304 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Amritsar Vs. PIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Amritsar (57.3 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 284 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 322 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 377 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 295 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 337 hits)

  Decision dated 29.09.2011 – Mr. G. Ramesh Reddy, Kurnool, AP Vs. CPIO, CGM, NABARD, Hyderabad (47.3 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 30.09..2011 – Shri Vikas Patel, Gandhidham Vs. Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust (rep. through Shri K.L. Sache, Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust) (342.3 KiB, 236 hits)

— Section 8 (1)(g)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 57 hits)

  Decision dated 12.03.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 09.01.2014 – Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 176 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2013 – Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 14.06.2013 – Shri V.N. Mathur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District (213.0 KiB, 166 hits)

  Decision dated 26.04.2013 – Shri Jagjit Singh, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R. Govindarajan, Tirrupur Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.2 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 270 hits)

  Decision dated 14.09.2012 – Shri Mohinder Singh Sidhu Vs. Dte. Gen. of Vigilance, Customs & Excise, New Delhi (195.6 KiB, 216 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Shri D.P. Ojha, DGP (Retd.), Patna Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (207.6 KiB, 244 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 317 hits)

— Section 8 (1)(h) – Information impeding the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 57 hits)

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Satinder Nath Sood Vs. CPIO, United Bank of India Regional Office, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 54 hits)

  Decision dated 05.06.2014 – Mr. S.P. Dogra, Ambala Cantt. Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Deptt. of Posts, Ambala (67.5 KiB, 96 hits)

  Decision dated 21.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara (63.0 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 12.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Hasmukhbai Maganbhai, Godhdra Vs. Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhra (64.5 KiB, 74 hits)

  Decision dated 12.03.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 139 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 09.01.2014 – Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 176 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 07.05.2013 – Shri P.S. Jadon, Lok Vihar Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 12.04.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak Vs. Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 222 hits)

  Decision dated 14.09.2012 – Shri Mohinder Singh Sidhu Vs. Dte. Gen. of Vigilance, Customs & Excise, New Delhi (195.6 KiB, 216 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri K. Thankshinamurthy, Madurai Vs. CPIO, CBI, Chennai (206.7 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri Jagdish Prasad, Ranchi Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (204.8 KiB, 225 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 324 hits)

— Section 8 (1)(i) – Cabinet Note, etc.

  Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi (474.1 KiB, 118 hits)

— Section 8 (1)(j) – Personal information having no relationship to any public activity or interest or involving invasion on privacy of individual 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla (44.9 KiB, 58 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 125 hits)

  Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi (54.2 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 102 hits)

  Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 44 hits)

  Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 05.05.2014 – Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 147 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Rakesh Gupta Vs. Kendriya Bhandar (216.9 KiB, 171 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 232 hits)

  Decision dated 12.03.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 11.02.2014 – Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 223 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Shri Girish Nautiyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (200.5 KiB, 214 hits)

  Decision dated 03.12.2013 – Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 233 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 07.11.2013 – Smt. Tapati Bhattacharjee Vs. Office of Dy. Conservator of Forests, Port Blair (95.2 KiB, 139 hits)

  Decision dated 08.10.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (95.7 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 17.09.2013 – Shri Amanullah Khan, Pune Vs. Tax Recovery Officer & AO, Pune (240.1 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 12.08.2013 – Shri M.Yogeshwar Raj Vs. Air India (211.1 KiB, 200 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 22.07.2013 – Shri Vishwas Bharmburkar, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi (208.8 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2013 – Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 13.06.2013 – Shri Kamal Sharma, Agra Vs. ACIT, Kanpur (64.6 KiB, 178 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 270 hits)

  Decision dated 15.03.2013 – Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 276 hits)

Delhi High Court Judgment dated 6.11.2012 

  Decision dated 01.06.2012 – Mr. S. Kandasamy, Manager, Pallavan Grama Bank, Irudhukottai, Tamilnadu Vs. PIO & GM, Pallavan Grama Bank, Salem, Tamilnadu (62.5 KiB, 246 hits)

  Decision dated 28.05.2012 – Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 304 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2012 – Mrs. Anita Singh, Galjwadi, Gadi Cant., Dehradun Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Bareilly (UP) (76.9 KiB, 359 hits)

  Decision dated 04.04.2012 – Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 410 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 377 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 342 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Mr. Sukhjit Singh Walia, Patiala Vs. PIO & Dir. (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (47.5 KiB, 237 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 284 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 337 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 397 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Sh. D.K. Pandey, Jamshedpur Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Ranchi (62.6 KiB, 256 hits)

— Section 8(2) – Public interest in disclosure outweighing harm to the protected interests

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 08.10.2013 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (95.7 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 01.06.2012 – Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 297 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 377 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 377 hits)

— Section 8 (Uncategorized)

  Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 09.03.2012 – Shri Ankur Mutreja, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Census Operations, New Delhi (213.3 KiB, 213 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Dr. Gyan Prakash Mishra, Distt. Balia, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court, UP (303.3 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Deepak Bhalla, Paharganj, New Delhi Vs. PIO, Embassy of India, The Netherlands and DS (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (187.1 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. A.M. Attar, Mumbai Vs. PIO & GZM, Bank of India, Mumbai (181.1 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 01.09.2011 – Smt. Neena, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 260 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mrs. Mary V. Abraham, Engg. College, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. PIO & Director, ISRO, Bangalore (62.7 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Mohit Paul, New Delhi Vs. PIO&DGM, Bank of India, Mumbai (59.3 KiB, 458 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 327 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Shri R.K. Jain Vs. CBEC, New Delhi (352.9 KiB, 329 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 476 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2011 – Mr. Mahinder Singh, AD, ESIC, New Delhi Vs. PIO, ESIC, Indore (57.9 KiB, 260 hits)

Section 9 – Grounds for rejection to access in certain cases

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 377 hits)

Section 10 – Severability

— Section 10 

  CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 39 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 125 hits)

  Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 126 hits)

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 171 hits)

Section 10(1)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 15.03.2013 – Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 21.08.2012 – Shri B.D. Gupta Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (239.6 KiB, 163 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 276 hits)

— Section 10(2)

  Decision dated 09.01.2014 – Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 176 hits)

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 305 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mrs. Mary V. Abraham, Engg. College, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. PIO & Director, ISRO, Bangalore (62.7 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2011 – Mr. Binoy Gupta, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Revenue & CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (57.0 KiB, 277 hits)

Section 11 – Third Party Information 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi (352.4 KiB, 204 hits)

  Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 05.05.2014 – Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 147 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 02.05.2014 – Shri Gaikwad Shahurao Vishwanthrao, Parbhani, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Nanded, Maharashtra (210.2 KiB, 107 hits)

  Decision dated 11.02.2014 – Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 223 hits)

  Decision dated 07.01.2014 – Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi (322.2 KiB, 529 hits)

  Decision dated 04.09.2013 – Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 299 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 14.06.2013 – Shri V.N. Mathur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District (213.0 KiB, 166 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Shri Sanjay Badekar, Mumbai Vs. LIC of India, Mumbai (91.3 KiB, 131 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (52.3 KiB, 145 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2012 – Mrs. Anita Singh, Galjwadi, Gadi Cant., Dehradun Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Bareilly (UP) (76.9 KiB, 359 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri S.P. Goyal Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (195.4 KiB, 305 hits)

Section 18 – Powers and Functions of Information Commissions

  Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) (350.5 KiB, 149 hits)

  Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (253.0 KiB, 134 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 30 hits)

  Decision dated 05.07.2013 – Shri Jayant Rakshit, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata (207.3 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Mr. M. Vellaipandi, STQC IT Centre, Chennai Vs. CPOI & Director, STQC Dte. under Min. of Comm. & IT, New Delhi (53.8 KiB, 160 hits)

  Decision dated 28.09.2012 – Shri Shiv Shankar Tiwari, Faridabad Vs. DOPT, New Delhi (331.0 KiB, 153 hits)

  Decision dated 14.08.2012 – Shri Syed Idramudin, Nizamabad Vs. Appellate Authority, Regional Passport Office, Secunderabad (331.0 KiB, 191 hits)

  Decision dated 30.04.2012 – Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 268 hits)

  Decision dated 06.03.2012 – Shri N. Srinivas, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, Chennai (298.2 KiB, 202 hits)

  Decision dated 12.01.2012 – Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 271 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 – Shri Murlidhar, Patna Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (286.2 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 28.11.2011 – Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 221 hits)

Direction to treat the appeal before the Commission as the First Appeal

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Dr. K. Padma Priya, Asstt. Professor, JNTU College of Engg., Pulivendula, A.P. Vs. FAA, AICTE, New Delhi (104.6 KiB, 130 hits)

  Decision dated 26.07.2013 – Shri Ramakrishna, Bangalore Vs. First Appellate Authority, CBSE Regional Office, Chennai (106.3 KiB, 140 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 09.11.2011 – Mr. Adishwar Jain Vs. Office of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (223.8 KiB, 187 hits)

Section 18 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi (352.1 KiB, 163 hits)

  Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 88 hits)

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 30 hits)

  Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 188 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 47 hits)

  Decision dated 24.12.2013 – First Appellate Authority (RTI), PAO (Ors), BEG, Roorkee, Uttarakhand (103.9 KiB, 245 hits)

Section 19 – Appeal

Section 19

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

— Section 19(1) – Appeal to First Appellate Authority (FAA)

  Decision dated 24.07.2013 – Shri Ashish Ranjan, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (210.9 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 219 hits)

  Decision dated 28.11.2011 – Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 221 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mrs. Ambika Sudhakaran, Palakkad, Kerala Vs. PIO, Bank of India, New Delhi (35.5 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 28.09.2011 – Mr. Nitesh Kumar Tripathi, Saifai Etawah, UP Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (34.6 KiB, 174 hits)

Section 19(3) – Submission of Second Appeal within 90 days 

  Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 57 hits)

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 40 hits)

  Decision dated 26.11.2014 – Shri Rohit Sabharwal Vs. Delhi Fire Service, GNCTD, Delhi (334.1 KiB, 39 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Shri V.K. Jha Vs. Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (317.5 KiB, 27 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 47 hits)

  Decision dated 22.10.2014 – Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board (208.1 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 302 hits)

  Decision dated 17.04.2014 – Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 120 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Mr. M. Vellaipandi, STQC IT Centre, Chennai Vs. CPOI & Director, STQC Dte. under Min. of Comm. & IT, New Delhi (53.8 KiB, 160 hits)

  Decision dated 30.04.2012 – Mr. Hassan Singh Mejie, Chandigarh Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (52.4 KiB, 177 hits)

  Decision dated 07.03.2012 – Shri Kamaldev Thakur, East Champaran, Bihar Vs. Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Motihari, Bihar (297.8 KiB, 181 hits)

  Decision dated 28.11.2011 – Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 221 hits)

Section 19(5) – CPIO to justify denial of information

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 324 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 310 hits)

Section 19(8) (a) – Direction to Secure Compliance with the RTI Act

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 17.10.2014 – Shri M.K. Gupta, Delhi Vs. PIO, Jt. Dir. (Gr.Cell), CGHS, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 45 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. Ankur Goyal, JNU, New Delhi Vs. JS, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (76.8 KiB, 286 hits)

Section 19(8) (b) – Compensation to the Information Seeker

  CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon (44.1 KiB, 47 hits)

  Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 188 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Bhanu Pratap, Moradabad Vs. US & CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Ajit Kumar, Patna Vs. Dy. Director, SSC, Allahabad (213.1 KiB, 148 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, Srinagar Vs. PIO & Program Executive, Prasar Bharti, Srinagar (48.2 KiB, 194 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Akshay Pant, Port Blair Vs. PIO, A&N Administration, Port Blair (60.6 KiB, 278 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Sh. D.K. Bindra, New Delhi Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 212 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 303 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 207 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Ms. Kiran Mehtra, Chandigarh Vs. PIO & Rergistrar-cum-Secretary, Central Council of Homeopathy, New Delhi (191.1 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 221 hits)

Section 20(1) and (2) – Penalties for not furnishing the information to the information seeker within the specified time 

  Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 94 hits)

  Decision dated 15.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Gurmeet Singh, Kanpur Vs. CGHS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (122.8 KiB, 21 hits)

  Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 88 hits)

  Decision dated 16.04.2014 – Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 114 hits)

  Decision dated 29.01.2014 – Shri Bhagwan Chand Saxena Vs. Export Inspection Council of India (213.0 KiB, 112 hits)

  Decision dated 22.11.2013 – Shri Rambir Singh, New Delhi Vs. Office of Additional District Magisrate, GNCT, New Delhi (93.8 KiB, 113 hits)

  Decision dated 11.11.2013 – Dr. Rajiv Bhandari, Panchkula Vs. Office of the Director of Higher Education, UT, Chandigarh (93.4 KiB, 113 hits)

  Decision dated 14.10.2013 – Shri Rakesh Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. Transport Department (GNCT), Delhi (305.7 KiB, 264 hits)

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur (UP) Vs. US, Staff Selection Committee, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 140 hits)

  Decision dated 05.07.2013 – Shri Jayant Rakshit, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata (207.3 KiB, 183 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Shri Pradip Shankar Choughule Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (221.5 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 20.05.2013 – Shri Bhanu Pratap, Moradabad Vs. US & CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur, UP Vs. CPIO, SSC, Allahabad (304.1 KiB, 169 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Ajit Kumar, Patna Vs. Dy. Director, SSC, Allahabad (213.1 KiB, 148 hits)

  Decision dated 15.02.2013 – Shri Ajay Pal, Bawal, Rewari, Haryana Vs. Under Secretary, SSC, New Delhi (303.8 KiB, 160 hits)

  Decision dated 08.10.2012 – Shri Madhav B. Karmakar Vs. Deptt. of Financial Services, New Delhi (87.7 KiB, 150 hits)

  Decision dated 14.08.2012 – Shri Syed Idramudin, Nizamabad Vs. Appellate Authority, Regional Passport Office, Secunderabad (331.0 KiB, 191 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 258 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Dinbandhu Sarkar, National Library, Kolkata Vs. National Library, Kolkata (76.6 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 06.03.2012 – Shri N. Srinivas, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, Chennai (298.2 KiB, 202 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri Gopal Singh, Distt. Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur (304.9 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 19.01.2012 – Mr. Tarun Nag, Kolkata Vs. PIO, Central Drugs Laboratory, Kolkata (56.4 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. R.C. Gupta, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. PIO & HOD, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi (48.3 KiB, 200 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 – Shri Murlidhar, Patna Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (286.2 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 322 hits)

  Decision dated 31.10.2011 – Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 231 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 324 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Sh. Jitendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. Min. of Home Affairs, New Delhi (613.7 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Shri S. Saravanan Vs. NHAI, New Delhi (182.8 KiB, 190 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Mr. Suresh Kumar Verma, Balrampur, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Kandaula Branch, UP (42.4 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 207 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Ms. Kiran Mehtra, Chandigarh Vs. PIO & Rergistrar-cum-Secretary, Central Council of Homeopathy, New Delhi (191.1 KiB, 201 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 221 hits)

  Decision dated 04.08.2011 – Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 07.07.2011 – Mr. Krishnanand Tripathi, Sr. Correspondent, Live India, New Delhi Vs. Mr. Anil Palta, CPIO&DIG, CBI, New Delhi (142.5 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 04.07.2011 – Mr. S.S. Ranawat, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) Vs. CPIO & SSP (HQ), CBI, New Delhi (102.1 KiB, 263 hits)

  Order dated 25.06.2011 – Mr. Govind Lal Arora, Burari, Delhi Vs. PIO & SDM (Civil Lines) & PIO & ADM (North), Delhi (49.2 KiB, 254 hits)

Section 22 – Act to have overriding effect 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 08.07.2013 – Shri Amarjit Sen, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 131 hits)

  Decision dated 02.11.2011 – Shri Ved Prakash Singhal, Nangloi Vs. Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (207.3 KiB, 231 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 327 hits)

Section 24

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2013 – Dr. S. Chellappa, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, CBI, Hyderabad (209.9 KiB, 153 hits)

  Decision dated 10.07.2013 – Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 312 hits)

  Decision dated 13.06.2013 – Shri Kamal Sharma, Agra Vs. ACIT, Kanpur (64.6 KiB, 178 hits)

  Decision dated 10.05.2013 – Ms. Medha Rani, Chandigarh Vs. CPI, CBI, Chandigarh (208.2 KiB, 194 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri Prakash Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI (ACB), New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 220 hits)

Section 25 – Monitoring and Reporting

Section 25(5) – Direction to the Public Authority

  Decision dated 12.01.2012 – Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 271 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 344 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 303 hits)

—————————————————————–
Go to SUBJECT-WISE DECISIONS
—————————————————————–

FULL BENCH DECISIONS OF CIC – Please click here.
Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. However, in case you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info@dtf.in.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 3.9/5 (263 votes cast)

Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise

More: * Latest DOPT / CVC / RTI / MOF / CGHS / DPE / RBI / IRDA Circulars / Orders; News * Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Section-Wise * Selected Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) * RTI – Rules/Notifications/Orders/Guidelines/Circulars * RTI – Court judgements * Right to Information Circulars/Orders (Subject-Wise)/DecisionsRTI News

SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS/POSTS
* CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi - The Commission directed the PIO/DTTE to inform the reasons for delay in giving the appellant the selection grade and also provide complete correspondence between the respondent and the DTTE within 15 days The Commission also directed to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for not giving complete information to the appellant. (Disclosure of Reasons)
* CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, DelhiCIC: “Hence, the Commission holds that there is a larger public interest that require disclosure of medical records of a patient as mandated under Section 8(1)(j) and directs the respondent authority to furnish the information about the medical records of her husband to the extent ….” (Sections 2,3,4,6(2),7,8,11,18,19, Right to Privacy, Larger Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai
– The Commission directed the FAA, Life Insurance Corporation to issue instructions to all the Divisional Offices for charging correct premium in this regard under intimation to the Commission.
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon – The Commission directed the department to compensate the appellant by an amount of Rs.1000/- for the inconvenience and detriment caused to him. [Section 19(8)(b)].
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla – The basic protection afforded by virtue of the exemption from disclosure enacted under Section 8(1)(j) cannot be lifted or disturbed unless the petitioner is able to justify how such disclosure would be in ‘public interest’. [Section 8(1)(j)]
* DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding
* Office of the Attorney General of India is a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. –  Delhi High Court Judgment dated 10.03.2015 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Office of Attorney General and R.K. Jain Vs. Office of Attorney General of India
* CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi
-  The Department of Posts has been requested to look into the issue and take appropriate steps to provide access to PIN code to prisoners lodged in various jails. (Larger Public Interest) * CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (Non-Disclosure Agreement, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (Voluminous Records, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi [Section 5(4)] * CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi - The Commission directed the CPIO of MoEF to, inter alia, perform their obligation under Section 4(1)(c) and 4(1)(d) of RTI Act, 2005, and to furnish the reasons for formulating the policy of not imposing any restrictions and instead permitting the DDA to go ahead with unrestricted installation of Mobile Towers in the lands of DDA, in spite of recommendations against. The Commission also recommended the Chief Minister’s Office and office of Lieutenant Governor to probe into the reasons for ignoring these vital reports and their recommendations about the adverse effects of EMF from Mobile Towers and also to inform the people as to what measures they would initiate in response to the recommendations of the Inter Ministerial Group or if they have rejected the recommendation, the reasons and grounds for the same. (Sections 4(1)(c)&(d)/Disclosure of Reasons) * CIC Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi - “The Commission directed the respondent authority to furnish information to the appellant as to the reasons for denial of Selection Grade to him as they are bound to give the same under Section 4(1)(c.) …” (Section 4(1)(c)/Disclosure of Reasons) * O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of  >>> RTI – Rules/Circulars * Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) - “The Commission reiterates that the Bar Council of Delhi should initiate proceedings against the complainant for alleged misconduct of sending a blank paper as RTI application and causing wastage of public money and time of Public Authority.” (Misuse of RTI/Action against Complainant)Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi – “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to obtain the information from the Society and furnish the same to the Complainant within thirty days of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi “The Commission also advises the appellant not to file repeated RTI applications which are aimless and useless. The Commission also advises the respondent authority not to share any personal information of the officers with the people like the appellant without invoking Section 11 of the RTI Act.” (Abuse of RTI) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi - “The CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant copies of such agreements, if available on the records of the public authority, by severing any information of a personal nature concerning the advocates, such as their personal address, bank account and income tax details etc., under Section 10 of the RTI Act.” [Section 10] * CIC Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai – The Commission cautioned the FAA to strictly follow the RTI regime while disposing of appeals and pass a speaking order, after taking due cognizance of merits of each case. * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi - “… names, addresses and phone nos./email addresses of all plaintiffs cannot be provided to the appellant as the same is third party information u/s 8(1)(j), the disclosure of which serves no larger public interest. … .. the appellant has neither suffered any detriment nor is there any public interest in seeking the information. Therefore, his plea for award of compensation is not accepted.” * Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore - “The appellant has not succeeded in demonstrating that the information asked for by him is in larger public interest. It being so, there is no need to interfere with the respondent’s decision.” [Section 8(1)(j)] * CIC Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi - “… the candidate with regard to his/her own answer sheet can obtain the copy of the same as a matter of right, but with regard to the answer sheet of third party, unless the candidate is able to show that large public interest is involved, the same cannot be furnished unless the candidate from whom it is sought for permits the same.” The Commission, therefore, directed to follow the procedure for supplying third party information U/S 11 of RTI Act, by seeking the opinion of the third party and taking a final decision by the PIO in this respect. [Sections 3, 8(1)(j), 11 and 19(3)]  * CIC Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi - “The Commission require the Chief Secretary of Delhi and Union Cabinet Secretary to disclose their policy on this issue under Section 4 of Right to Information Act and also inform the appellants about their proposed steps to implement recommendation of Lokayuktha of Delhi in effectively preventing photo publicity of the political rulers.” * CIC Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal, New Delhi - The Commission recommended change of officer to be designated as FAA. * CIC Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi [Sections 7(9), 18 & 20)] * Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi - The CIC has directed the Law Ministry to disclose the Cabinet note about the decision to establish a National Judicial Appointments Commission, saying that such documents are not secret and should thus be made public. * CIC Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain [Sections 8(1)(e), 8(1)(j)] * Delhi HC Judgement dated 04.12.2014 – The Registrar, Supreme Court of India Vs. Commodore Lokesh K. Batra and Ors. - Hon’ble Delhi High Court: “I find no infirmity with the impugned order in so far as it directs that the records may be maintained in a manner so that the information regarding the period for which the judgments are pending after being reserved, is available with the petitioner in future.” [Sections 4(1)(b), 7(9) and 19(8)(a)(iv)] * CIC Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi - CIC: “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to conduct an inquiry u/s 18(2) of the RTI Act to find out reasons and officer responsible for delay in payment of remuneration to the Appellant for nearly three years, for initiating disciplinary action against such officer. …” * CIC Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi - CIC: “The Appellate Authority is cautioned not to dismiss any appeals without reading the contents of the appeals or hearing the parties.”CIC Decision dated 10.10.2014 – Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board - “The Commission … … recommends the Public Authority to treat the RTI application as a complaint and as a regulatory initiate action against the persons who had installed nonfunctioning meters.”Madras High Court Judgement dated 17.09.2014 – PIO-Registrar (Admn.), High Court, Madras Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi & another - “… … the first respondent-Commission clearly erred in passing the impugned order in this Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to furnish the details to the second respondent as well as sending a tabular statement listing all the complaints and representations received from the second respondent.” * Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi – “The Commission recommends the respondent authority to prepare a consolidated report of the appellant’s RTI applications and upload the same in their website, showing it as a case of misuse of RTI.”

SUBJECT-WISE DECISIONS
Abuse/Misuse of the RTI Act * Action against Complainant * Action/Disciplinary Action Against CPIO/PIO/FAA * Action Taken * Banking – Bank Loan/Transaction/DRT, NPA * Cabinet Note, etc. * Compensation to Complainant * Complaint/2nd Appeal * Court / Advocate’s fees, etc. * Defence Organisation * Disciplinary/Vigilance Case/Complaint MatterComplaint Matter – Departmental Inquiry – Disciplinary Action/Case – Vigilance Case/CBI Prosecution * Disclosure of Reasons * Environment/Afforestation Programme * Evidence Act * Examination/Test & Answer/Marks Sheet * Expenses/Expenditure of Public Authority, Including Lease Agreement * File Notings * First Appeal/First Appellate Authority – No Additional Information at the Appeal Stage * House Rent/Lease Rent and Attendance Register * Income Tax * Information Not To Be complied * Information prohibited under other Act/s * Inspection of Records * Larger Public Interest * Non-Disclosure Agreement * Passport * Payment of fees * Personal Hearing * Personal Information * Police/CBI/Other Authority’s Investigation/Report * Political Parties * Refund of Additional Fee paid by Appellant/Complainant * Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS) * Reply to the sent in the language of the RTI application * Senior Citizen * Service Matters - ACRs/APARs – Cadre Review – CGHS – EL/CL, Attendance, PF, Promotion/FCS, gratuity, etc. – House Building Advance (HBA) – Official Tour/Transfer TA – Pension/Gratuity – Reservation – Selection/Apptt. Process – Service Book – Uncategorized * Single Subject Matter * Speed Post * Tendering/Contract * Transfer of RTI Application * Travel * Treatment/Medical Records/Hospital * Vengeful Applicant * Voluminous Records

Go to SECTION-WISE DECISIONS

Updated on 22.04.2015

SUBJECT-WISE DECISIONS 

Abuse/Misuse of the RTI Act

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi (352.4 KiB, 204 hits)

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 40 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 20.08.2014 – Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 302 hits)

  Decision dated 25.06.2014 – Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi (450.2 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 05.05.2014 – Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 147 hits)

Action against Complainant

  Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) (350.5 KiB, 149 hits)

Action/Disciplinary Action Against CPIO/PIO/FAA

  Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 127 hits)

  Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 88 hits)

  Decision dated 01.12.2014 – Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 188 hits)

  Decision dated 14.10.2013 – Shri Rakesh Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. Transport Department (GNCT), Delhi (305.7 KiB, 264 hits)

 Action Taken

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi (352.1 KiB, 163 hits)

  Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 94 hits)

  Decision dated 22.10.2014 – Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 232 hits)

  Decision dated 03.12.2013 – Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 233 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mrs. Shakuntala Jayant, Pandav Nagar, Delhi Vs. PIO, MCD, New Delhi (51.5 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Shri Nitin Nayyar, Mohali Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (209.7 KiB, 216 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. K. Karthirmathiyon, Secy., Coimbatore Consumer Cause, Coimbatore Vs. PIO & JS, Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.4 KiB, 226 hits)

Banking/Deposits

Bank Loan/Transaction/DRT or NPA

  Decision dated 02.05.2014 – Shri Gaikwad Shahurao Vishwanthrao, Parbhani, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Nanded, Maharashtra (210.2 KiB, 107 hits)

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 139 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Satya Prakash Mishra, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow (207.2 KiB, 116 hits)

  Decision dated 01.06.2012 – Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 297 hits)

  Decision dated 22.02.2012 – Shri Gopal Singh, Distt. Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur (304.9 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Amritsar Vs. PIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Amritsar (57.3 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 09.11.2011 – Mr. K.R. Basu, Tirunelveli-7 Vs. PIO & CGM, Indian Bank, Chennai (52.7 KiB, 283 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Ms. Rekha Makharia, Mumbai Vs. PIO (Law) & Company Secy., IDBI Bank Ltd., Mumbai (48.4 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. A.M. Attar, Mumbai Vs. PIO & GZM, Bank of India, Mumbai (181.1 KiB, 240 hits)

Deposits (New) 

  Decision dated 21.05.2014 – Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara (63.0 KiB, 394 hits)

Savings Account

  Decision dated 16.04.2014 – Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 114 hits)

Cabinet Note, etc.

  Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi (474.1 KiB, 118 hits)

Compensation to Complainant

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi (54.2 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 15.10.2013 – Shri Deepak Khullar, New Delhi Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (91.3 KiB, 127 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 259 hits)

Complaint/2nd Appeal

  Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) (23.1 KiB, 159 hits)

  Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 127 hits)

Court Case/ Advocate’s fees, etc.

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi (54.2 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 102 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Ashutosh Pandey, Bhopal Vs. UPSC, New Delhi (74.4 KiB, 71 hits)

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Dr. Gyan Prakash Mishra, Distt. Balia, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court, UP (303.3 KiB, 228 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Shri R.D. Batra, Secy. Citizen Rights Association II, Ghaziabad, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court Court, UP (205.1 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 342 hits)

  Decision dated 02.11.2011 – Shri Ved Prakash Singhal, Nangloi Vs. Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (207.3 KiB, 231 hits)

Defence Organisation

  Decision dated 04.07.2013 – Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 453 hits)

Disciplinary/Vigilance Case/Complaint Matter 
Complaint Matter * Departmental Inquiry * Disciplinary Action/Case * Vigilance Case/CBI Prosecution

Complaint Matter

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi (352.1 KiB, 163 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 232 hits)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 276 hits)

  Decision dated 12.01.2012 – Shri D.K. Aggarwal, Moradabad Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (55.1 KiB, 210 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 377 hits)

More: O.M. dated 14.08.2013 – Disclosure of personal information under the RTI Act, 2005 

— Departmental Inquiry

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2013 – Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 21.08.2012 – Shri Harendra Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 195 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Shri Nitin Nayyar, Mohali Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (209.7 KiB, 216 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Shri D.P. Ojha, DGP (Retd.), Patna Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (207.6 KiB, 244 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Akshay Pant, Port Blair Vs. PIO, A&N Administration, Port Blair (60.6 KiB, 278 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 342 hits)

  Decision dated 11.08.2011 – Shri Ajay Hariharno, Durg Vs. SBI, Bhopal (128.2 KiB, 240 hits)

Disciplinary Action/Case

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 102 hits)

  Decision dated 09.06.2014 – Smt. Walia Nasreen, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi (295.2 KiB, 87 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Harkrishan Das Nijhawan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (96.5 KiB, 144 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. A.K. Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO & Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (62.9 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 21.02.2012 – Shri R.D. Batra, Secy. Citizen Rights Association II, Ghaziabad, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court Court, UP (205.1 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 342 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 303 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. L.S.R. Murthy, Hyderabad Vs. PIO&AGM, UCO Bank, Hyderabad (47.1 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 01.09.2011 – Shri N.R. Choudhary, Gurgaon Vs. Min. of Railways, New Delhi (212.8 KiB, 201 hits)

More: O.M. dated 14.08.2013 – Disclosure of personal information under the RTI Act, 2005

— Vigilance Case/CBI Prosecution 

  Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 102 hits)

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 57 hits)

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 139 hits)

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 12.08.2013 – Shri M.Yogeshwar Raj Vs. Air India (211.1 KiB, 200 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 257 hits)

  Decision dated 26.06.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 256 hits)

  Decision dated 07.05.2013 – Shri P.S. Jadon, Lok Vihar Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 12.04.2013 – Shri Rednam Deepak Vs. Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 222 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R. Govindarajan, Tirrupur Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.2 KiB, 189 hits)

  Decision dated 21.03.2013 – Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 270 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Mr. A.K. Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO & Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (62.9 KiB, 306 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Shri J.K. Sharma Vs. Delhi Police (199.5 KiB, 198 hits)

  Decision dated 30.01.2012 – Mr. Akshay Pant, Port Blair Vs. PIO, A&N Administration, Port Blair (60.6 KiB, 278 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 306 hits)

Disclosure of Reasons 

  CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi (249.7 KiB, 16 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 76 hits)

  Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi (258.2 KiB, 188 hits)

Environment/Afforestation Programme

  CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 76 hits)

  Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 63 hits)

  Decision dated 30.04.2012 – Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 268 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. Asstt. IG, Min. of Environment & Forest, New Delhi (90.6 KiB, 218 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 303 hits)

  Decision dated 22.09.2011 – Mr. Ankur Goyal, JNU, New Delhi Vs. JS, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (76.8 KiB, 286 hits)

Examination/Test/Answer Sheet/s

  Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 23.05.2014 – Ms. Meenu Kumari Vs. Delhi State Service Selection Board, Delhi (256.9 KiB, 99 hits)

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri K.P. Singh Vs. U.P.S.C., New Delhi (199.4 KiB, 126 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur (UP) Vs. US, Staff Selection Committee, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 140 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2013 – Shri Kuldeep Yadav, Beri, Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana Vs. CPIO, Institute of Hotel Management, Pusa, New Delhi (208.1 KiB, 110 hits)

  Decision dated 24.07.2013 – Shri Ashish Ranjan, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (210.9 KiB, 161 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur, UP Vs. CPIO, SSC, Allahabad (304.1 KiB, 169 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2013 – Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 192 hits)

  Decision dated 12.09.2012 – Shri Sunil Kumar, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 165 hits)

  Decision dated 31.08.2012 – Shri Ravi Malpani, Ratlam, M.P. Vs. SSC, New Delhi (204.9 KiB, 185 hits)

  Decision dated 30.07.2012 – Shri Manish Kumar Singh, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (306.3 KiB, 193 hits)

  Decision dated 30.07.2012 – Shri U.N.L. Das, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (206.1 KiB, 168 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 344 hits)

  Decision dated 05.10.2011 – Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 310 hits)

Marks Sheet

  Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 30.07.2012 – Shri Manish Kumar Singh, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (306.3 KiB, 193 hits)

  Decision dated 30.07.2012 – Shri U.N.L. Das, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (206.1 KiB, 168 hits)

Evidence Act

  Decision dated 06.07.2012 – Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 403 hits)

Expenses/Expenditure of Public Authority, Including Lease Agreement

  Decision dated 26.04.2013 – Shri Jagjit Singh, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 215 hits)

  Decision dated 29.12.2011 – Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 305 hits)

  Decision dated 12.10.2011 – Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. CPIO & General Manager, RBI, Mumbai (71.8 KiB, 326 hits)

  Decision dated 30.09..2011 – Shri Vikas Patel, Gandhidham Vs. Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust (rep. through Shri K.L. Sache, Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust) (342.3 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Mr. H.G. Prabhu, Karkala Vs. PIO&DGM, Corporation Bank, Mangalore (39.8 KiB, 248 hits)

  Decision dated 11.04.2013 – Shri R.P. Pandeya, New Delhi Vs. CBDT, New Delhi (68.5 KiB, 178 hits)

File Notings

  Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 127 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 232 hits)

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. U.P.S.C. (69.6 KiB, 83 hits)

  Decision dated 09.01.2014 – Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 176 hits)

  Decision dated 23.10.2013 – Shri V.K. Pandey, Kolkata Vs. LIC of India, Kolkata (91.7 KiB, 239 hits)

  Decision dated 27.09.2013 – Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 348 hits)

  Decision dated 26.09.2013 – Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 267 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2013 – Shri S.S. Upathyaya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, The Ahoka Hotel, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi (211.5 KiB, 119 hits)

More: O.M. dated 23.6.2009 – Disclosure of file noting under the RTI Act

First Appeal/First Appellate Authority

  Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 127 hits)

  Decision dated 02.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal Vs. PIO, Dy. Land & Development Officer, Min. of Urban Development, New Delhi (45.4 KiB, 37 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 47 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 54 hits)

Additional information can not be sought at the Appeal Stage.

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Hardeep Singh Sawhney Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi (198.6 KiB, 357 hits)

— Other Decisions

  Decision dated 10.03.2014 – Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 139 hits)

House Rent/Lease Rent and Attendance Register

  Decision dated 08.05.2013 – Shri S. Kumar Minz, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, All India Radio, Patna (210.0 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 01.09.2011 – Smt. Neena, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 260 hits)

Income Tax

  Decision dated 15.05.2014 – Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2013 – Shri D. Selvaraj, Namakkal Vs. Income Tax Officer & DIT, Chennai (241.8 KiB, 107 hits)

  Decision dated 17.09.2013 – Shri Amanullah Khan, Pune Vs. Tax Recovery Officer & AO, Pune (240.1 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 02.08.2013 – Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 310 hits)

  Decision dated 19.02.2013 – Shri Rishipal Singh, Distt. Haridwar, Uttarakhand vs. ITO(Inv.)(HQ) & Addl. Director of IT (Inv.), Lucknow (74.3 KiB, 142 hits)

Information not to be complied

  Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Dipak J. Gandhi Vs. Supreme Court (52.2 KiB, 489 hits)

Information prohibited under other Act/s

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 327 hits)

Inspection of Records

  Decision dated 03.04.2014 – Mr. S. Dhanabalan, Veppur, Perambalur District Vs. CPIO, Office of Postmaster General, Tiruchirapalli (47.9 KiB, 96 hits)

Larger Public Interest 

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi (47.6 KiB, 89 hits)

Mediclaim

  CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 39 hits)

Non-Disclosure Agreement

  CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 125 hits)

Passport

  Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 44 hits)

  Decision dated 30.05.2012 – Mr. Tek Chand Kotwal, Rohini, Delhi Vs. PIO & RPO, Regional Passport Office, New Delhi (51.4 KiB, 173 hits)

  Decision dated 01.05.2012 – Mrs. Anita Singh, Galjwadi, Gadi Cant., Dehradun Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Bareilly (UP) (76.9 KiB, 359 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Sh. D.K. Pandey, Jamshedpur Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Ranchi (62.6 KiB, 256 hits)

Payment of fees

  Decision dated 07.01.2014 – Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Coal (106.9 KiB, 304 hits)

  Decision dated 04.09.2013 – Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 299 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2012 – Shri Ram M. Apte, Balgaum Vs. CPIO, High Court of Karnakatak, Bangaluru (204.9 KiB, 353 hits)

  Decision dated 03.04.2012 – Shri Bindeshwar Shah, Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad (207.2 KiB, 200 hits)

Personal Hearing

  Decision dated 25.11.2014 – Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 54 hits)

  Decision dated 26.07.2013 – Shri Ramakrishna, Bangalore Vs. First Appellate Authority, CBSE Regional Office, Chennai (106.3 KiB, 140 hits)

  Decision dated 24.07.2013 – Shri S.A.A. Abbasi, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 140 hits)

Personal Information 

  Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 171 hits)

  Decision dated 19.12.2014 – Shri Jai Prakash Deep Vs. CPIO, India Oil Corporation Ltd., Bhopal (331.9 KiB, 35 hits)

Police/CBI/Other Authority’s Investigation/Report

  Decision dated 12.12.2014 – Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 57 hits)

  Decision dated 27.01.2014 – Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2013 – Shri D. Selvaraj, Namakkal Vs. Income Tax Officer & DIT, Chennai (241.8 KiB, 107 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2013 – Dr. S. Chellappa, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, CBI, Hyderabad (209.9 KiB, 153 hits)

  Decision dated 11.07.2013 – Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 10.07.2013 – Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 312 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri Prakash Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI (ACB), New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 220 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri K. Thankshinamurthy, Madurai Vs. CPIO, CBI, Chennai (206.7 KiB, 238 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri Jagdish Prasad, Ranchi Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (204.8 KiB, 225 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Shri K. Nagraj, IPS, Tripura Vs. CPIO, New Delhi (209.3 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 31.07.2012 – Ms. Manju, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 158 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 241 hits)

  Decision dated 28.05.2012 – Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 304 hits)

Political Parties

  Decision dated 03.06.2013 – Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 494 hits)

Refund of Additional Fee paid by Appellant/Complainant

  Decision dated 11.11.2011 – Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & GM, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (70.2 KiB, 164 hits)

Retention of Records

  Decision dated 05.10.2012 – Shri Partha Mandal, Delhi Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 150 hits)

Registrar of Cooperative Societies (RCS)

  Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (253.0 KiB, 134 hits)

  Decision dated 17.04.2014 – Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 120 hits)

Reply to be sent in the language of the RTI application 

  Decision dated 14.08.2013 – Shri K. Madhavan, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 227 hits)

Senior Citizen

  CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 39 hits)

Service Matters

ACRs/APARs * Cadre Review * CGHS * EL/CL, Attendance, PF, Promotion/FCS, gratuity, etc. * House Building Advance (HBA) * LTC * Official Tour/Transfer TA * Pension/Gratuity * Reservation * Selection/Apptt. Process * Service Book * Uncategorized

ACRs/APARs

  Decision dated 13.11.2013 – Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 22.07.2013 – Shri Vishwas Bharmburkar, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi (208.8 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Ramesh Sawant, Mumbai Vs. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai (89.8 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 07.02.2012 – Shri Radhakrishnan B. Toshawara Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Surat-II (179.4 KiB, 197 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 394 hits)

Cadre Review

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Ramesh Kumar Anand, Steno., PGIMER, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, PGIMER, Chandigarh (44.6 KiB, 320 hits)

CGHS

  Decision dated 15.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Gurmeet Singh, Kanpur Vs. CGHS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (122.8 KiB, 21 hits)

  Decision dated 17.10.2014 – Shri M.K. Gupta, Delhi Vs. PIO, Jt. Dir. (Gr.Cell), CGHS, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 45 hits)

  Decision dated 19.01.2012 – Mr. Tarun Nag, Kolkata Vs. PIO, Central Drugs Laboratory, Kolkata (56.4 KiB, 256 hits)

Deputation

  Decision dated 24.04.2014 – Shri Rakesh Gupta Vs. Kendriya Bhandar (216.9 KiB, 171 hits)

  Decision dated 24.07.2013 – Shri S.A.A. Abbasi, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 140 hits)

EL/CL, Attendance, PF, Promotion/FCS, Gratuity, etc.

  CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi (249.7 KiB, 16 hits)

  Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 44 hits)

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Farhat Ali Khan, Banda, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad UP Gramin Bank, Banda, UP (207.0 KiB, 82 hits)

  Decision dated 26.08.2013 – Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 07.08.2013 – Shri Balbeer Krishan Arora, Farukhabad Vs. CPIO, Office of AG-I, Uttar Pradesh (207.8 KiB, 122 hits)

  Decision dated 18.07.2013 – Shri Ashok Kumar Joshi Vs. ITI Ltd., Gonda (201.7 KiB, 121 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Shri Pradip Shankar Choughule Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (221.5 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Ramesh Sawant, Mumbai Vs. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai (89.8 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 09.03.2012 – Shri Abhi Ghosh, Kolkata Vs. Air India Ltd., New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 240 hits)

  Decision dated 19.01.2012 – Mr. A.L. Makhijani, President, Forum for Good Governance, Delhi Vs. CMO, CGHS, New Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi (47.3 KiB, 249 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 337 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 397 hits)

House Building Advance (HBA)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Shri D.M. Jotania, Nav Mumbai Vs. Central Railway, Divisional Manager’s Office, Mumbai (210.5 KiB, 176 hits)

LTC

  Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 127 hits)

Official Tour/Transfer TA

  Decision dated 19.07.2013 – Shri L.V. Raju Vs. Northern Coalfields Ltd. (215.4 KiB, 123 hits)

  Decision dated 09.05.2013 – Shri J.S. Singhal, ASW(E), AIR, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (207.6 KiB, 132 hits)

Pension/Gratuity

  CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla (44.9 KiB, 58 hits)

  Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 394 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. G.B. Chandulal, Rajkot Vs. PIO & GM, Dena Bank, Mumbai (39.3 KiB, 238 hits)

Reservation

  Decision dated 03.11.2014 – Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 85 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2012 – Shri Manish Kumar, Varanasi Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (87.4 KiB, 157 hits)

  Decision dated 21.08.2012 – Shri Harendra Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 195 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Amardeep Gulati, Shahdara, Delhi Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (53.0 KiB, 186 hits)

Selection/Apptt. Process

  Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 15.11.2013 – Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 29.05.2013 – Shri Pradip Shankar Choughule Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (221.5 KiB, 162 hits)

  Decision dated 10.10.2012 – Shri Manish Kumar, Varanasi Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (87.4 KiB, 157 hits)

  Decision dated 15.06.2012 – Dr. Kamal Saini Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (195.8 KiB, 174 hits)

  Decision dated 04.04.2012 – Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 410 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 259 hits)

  Decision dated 16.12.2011 – Mr. Sukhjit Singh Walia, Patiala Vs. PIO & Dir. (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (47.5 KiB, 237 hits)

  Decision dated 24.11.2011 – Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 284 hits)

  Decision dated 31.10.2011 – Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 231 hits)

Service Book

  Decision dated 17.12.2014 – Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 174 hits)

— Uncategorized

  Decision dated 12.09.2012 – Shri M. Shiva Shankar, Hyderabad Vs. LIC of India, Hyderabad (86.9 KiB, 154 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Ramesh Sawant, Mumbai Vs. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai (89.8 KiB, 226 hits)

  Decision dated 24.05.2012 – Mr. Amardeep Gulati, Shahdara, Delhi Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (53.0 KiB, 186 hits)

  Decision dated 04.11.2011 – Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 322 hits)

  Decision dated 16.09.2011 – Mr. H.S. Kasabe, Dresser, CGHS, Mumbai Vs. PIO & CMO, CGHS, Mumbai (48.2 KiB, 206 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Vijay Narayana Rai, Bikaner Vs. CPIO, Dte. General of All India Radio, New Delhi (47.4 KiB, 189 hits)

Single Subject Matter

  Decision dated 26.08.2011 – Mr. D.K. Bhaumik, Kolkata Vs. CPIO & GM, SIDBI, Lucknow (68.3 KiB, 306 hits)

Speed Post

  CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon (44.1 KiB, 47 hits)

Tendering/Contract

  Decision dated 31.07.2013 – Shri S.S. Upathyaya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, The Ahoka Hotel, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi (211.5 KiB, 119 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 317 hits)

  Decision dated 19.09.2011 – Sh. Jitendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. Min. of Home Affairs, New Delhi (613.7 KiB, 236 hits)

  Decision dated 06.09.2011 – Mr. Deepak Bhalla, Paharganj, New Delhi Vs. PIO, Embassy of India, The Netherlands and DS (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (187.1 KiB, 260 hits)

Transfer of RTI Application

  Decision dated 17.07.2014 – Shri Sudhir Goyal, Dehradun Vs. PMO, New Delhi (129.0 KiB, 95 hits)

Travel/Foreign Travel

  Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 44 hits)

Treatment/Medical Records/Hospital

  CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 13 hits)

  Decision dated 23.12.2011 – Mr. R.C. Gupta, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. PIO & HOD, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi (48.3 KiB, 200 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 295 hits)

  Decision dated 21.10.2011 – Sh. D.K. Bindra, New Delhi Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 212 hits)

Vengeful Applicant

  Decision dated 11.12.2014 – Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 40 hits)

  Decision dated 15.02.2013 – Shri Ajay Kumar Sharma, Indira Enclave, P.O. Mehubala, Dehradun Vs. CPIO, Office of the Principal AG (Audit), Uttarakhand, Dehradun (207.1 KiB, 150 hits)

Voluminous Records

  Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 126 hits)

Go to SECTION-WISE DECISIONS
————————————————-
FULL BENCH DECISIONS OF CIC – Please click here.

Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. However, in case you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info@dtf.in.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.0/5 (63 votes cast)
Scroll To Top

Free Account Required

You must login/create a Free Account to access DTF.IN

Close

Register an Account

Account Details
*

*

Password Strength

Profile Details
Upload a profile picture

*

*

Social Profiles

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.0/5 (477 votes cast)
default-poup