Home » Right to Information » CIC Decisions/Court Judgements » Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Section-Wise
CIC Decisions - Section-Wise

Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Section-Wise

LINKS TO OTHER RTI PAGES
Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise.
Selected Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC).
RTI – Rules/Guidelines/Orders (Date-Wise).
RTI Rules/Orders (Subject-Wise)
.

RTI – Court Judgements

MORE: Latest Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT)/DPPW Orders/Circulars

SECTION-WISE DECISIONS

SIGNIFICANT CIC DECISIONS

Go to RTI News.

RECENT CIC DECISIONS/JUDGEMENTS

2024

  • CIC Decision dated 04.04.2024 on the second appeal filed by Chandrakant Shah Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank, New Delhi – During the hearing on 04.04.2024, the appellant was absent. The respondent submitted that as on date no Email IDs of the directors were available on their website. Therefore, the Commission directed the respondent to re-visit the RTI application and provide the correct status of the information sought to the appellant within 10 days from the date of the receipt of this order, under intimation to the Commission [Names & Emails of Bank’s Directors]
  • CIC Order dated 16.01.2024 on the second appeal filed by Shri Govind Prasad Goel Vs. Manager, RTI, FCI, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh – CIC: “प्रस्तुत संदर्भ में यह उल्लेख प्रासंगिक होगा कि सिविल अपील संख्या 10045/2010 (सीपीआईओ, उच्चतम न्यायालय बनाम सुभाष चन्द्र अग्रवाल) में उच्चतम न्यायालय ने दिनांक 13.11.2019 को दिये गए अपने निर्णय में यह अधिकथित किया है कि किसी व्यक्ति के व्यक्तिगत रिकार्ड, जिसमें व्यक्ति का नाम, पता, भौतिक, मानसिक, शारीरिक अवस्था, ग्रेड, उत्तर पत्रक, योग्यता, कार्य-निष्पादन, मूल्यांकन रिकार्ड, एसीआर, अनुशासनात्मक कार्यवाही, चिकित्सा रिकार्ड, आयकर रिकार्ड, आदि उस व्यक्ति की निजी सूचना की श्रेणी में आती है, जिसका प्रकटन सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 8(1)(जे) के प्रावधानों के अंतर्गत किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं की जा सकती है। [Section 8(1)(j); Personal Information]
  • CIC Order dated 12.01.2024 on the second appeal filed by Mandeep Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, Bengaluru – CIC: “Perusal of the record further revealed that the duties and responsibilities of the agricultural field officers, as sought on point no. 6 of the RTI application, is dependent upon their posting, department, and the nature of the work, and no such guideline is available with the respondent authority, however, the same is not reflecting in the aforesaid reply of the respondent. Thus, the exemption claimed by the respondent on point no. 6 of the RTI application is incorrect. Therefore, the Commission directs the respondent to provide a revised reply on the basis of submission given during the course of hearing ...” [Section 8(1)(a); Banking, Duties of Bank Officer]

2023

  • CIC Order dated 28.12.2023 on the second appeal filed by Harmohan Kumar Arora Vs. CPIO, UCO Bank, Kolkata – CIC: “… … the reply of the CPIO is incomplete. Even though the CPIO in his reply has explained that as per points no. (b) & (c) of the Information Disclosure Policy Document 2022-23 dated 16.09.2022, the information being confidential in nature cannot be provided, however, no exemption as enlisted u/s 8 of the RTI Act has been claimed by the CPIO. The CPIO should note that only such information is exempted from disclosure if the same falls under any of the sub-categories mentioned in Section 8 of the RTI Act. The CPIO is therefore directed to provide a revised reply to the appellant on these points while claiming a proper exemption under the provisions of the RTI Act.
    1. With regard to point no. 4, the information has been rightly denied u/s 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. xxx xxx

    10. In view of the above, the CPIO is directed to provide a revised reply on points no. 1, 2 & 3 as per the provisions of the RTI Act.” [Section 8(1)(h); CBI Investigation/Prosecution]

  • CIC Decision dated 25.10.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Subrata Goswami vs. PIO, Department of Posts, Yogayog Bhawan, C.R. Avenue, Kolkata-12 – Referring to a judgement of Delhi High Court, the CIC, inter alia, observed that ‘malafide’ on the part of the PIO to deny disclosure of information is a sine qua non for imposition of penalties specified under the RTI Act, 2005. The CIC accepted the explanation tendered by the then PIO and found no reason to disbelieve him. There was nothing on record to suggest that he acted malafidely or failed to exercise his due diligence. The penalty proceedings were dropped by the CIC. [Section 20(1); penalty on the CPIO/PIO]
  • CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ram Meena vs. PIO, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, I.P. Estate, New Delhi -The CIC observed that in the matter of Khanapuram Gandaiah vs Administrative Officer &Ors. [SLP (CIVIL) NO.34868 OF 2009], the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as under:
    “… … The definition cannot include within its fold answers to the question why which would be the same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not done in the sense of a justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justifications are matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information.” (Emphasis Supplied)
    Hence, it was decided by the CIC that no intervention of the Commission at this stage was required in the matter. [Sections 2(f), 8(1)(h); Case under investigation]
  • CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Yash Malhotra vs. CPIO, Income Tax Department, Vikas Bhawan, IP Estate, New Delhi – The CIC directed the CPIO to provide only the “generic details of the net taxable income/gross income” of the Appellant’s wife for the specified time period as contained in the RTI Application. [Section 8(1)(j); Income of wife]
  • CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited – CIC: “Filing a series of RTI applications and inundating the CPIOs with queries is not in keeping with the spirit of the RTI Act. … … A single information seeker cannot usurp a collective right to the detriment of all others having an identical right nor should a person be allowed to file indiscriminate and unchecked Second Appeals/Complaints so as to clog the system of adjudication itself to the disadvantage of others. It will lead to a colossal waste of time and resources of the Commission which has the obligation to cater to thousands of genuine information seekers facing hurdles. The means adopted by the Complainant … … only points to the ignorance of the Complainant about the spirit of the RTI Act.”
    Hence, the complaints were dismissed by the Hon’ble CIC. [Sections 8(1)(d) & (j), 11, 18, 20;  Third Party Information, Indiscriminate Second Appeals/Complaints]
  • CIC Decision dated 06.07.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi vs. O/o of Pr. Chief Commissioner of (IT), CCA), Kanpur and O/o of Addl./Jt. CIT, Central Range, Meerut – The Commission, inter alia, directed the CPIO to reiterate his offer of inspection of the relevant available records on a mutually decided date and time.
    Further, copy of documents, as identified and desired by the Appellant was required to be provided free of cost upto 50 pages and thereafter upon receipt of RTI fees as per RTI Rules, 2012. In doing so, the CPIO was at liberty to redact the relevant records of third party’s disclosure of which stood exempted under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act by keeping in view the applicability of Section 10 of RTI Act for severance of records.
    The CPIO was also directed to by the Commision to ensure that due assistance is provided to the Appellant during the inspection in accessing and identifying the records. [Sections 8(1)(j), 10; Inspection of Records, IT Search Operations] 
  • CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab – It has, inter alia, been observed by the CIC that “… … outstretching the interpretation of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act to include deductions and inferences to be drawn by the CPIO is unwarranted as it casts immense pressure on the CPIOs to ensure that they provide the correct deduction/inference to avoid being subject to penal provisions under the RTI Act.”
    It was further observed that point wise replies furnished by the CPIO to assist the Appellant was in the spirit of RTI, merits of which ccould not be called into question. [Sections 2(f), 7(9), 8(1)(d)(e) & (j); Humongous Information Sought by Applicant, Multiple RTI applications, SBI]
  • CIC Decision dated 24.04.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Satwant Singh Yadav vs. PIO, PMA Cell, Director Police-I, Ministry of Home Affairs – The CIC observed that the CPIO has denied the information to the Appellant under Section 8 (1) (i) of the RTI Act for point no. 2, 3 and 4 of the RTI Application, which is legally untenable.The Commission further observed that denial of information under Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act for point no. 5 of the RTI Application is not found legally convincing. Therefore, the Commission directed the CPIO to provide a revised reply qua the query number 5 of the instant RTI Application, either justifying the denial of information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, or furnish the information sought by the Appellant, invoking the severability clause under Section 10 of the RTI Act, to redact all personal information related to any third party. [Sections 8(1)(i)&(i), 10; Consideration For Gallantry Award]
  • Sec. 6(1), 8(1)(e) & (j); CM Arvind Kejriwal, Oral request suo motu converted into an RTI application; Educational document is personal information; Personal Information; Penalty on Respondent No.2
    Gujarat High Court directed as under:-
    Para 30
    “In absence of any inherent or suo moto powers being vested in the commission by the RTI Act, the Commission could not have entertained an oral request and suo moto converted it into an RTI application; that too at an appellate stage.”
    xxx                xxx                  xxx
    “40.   Further despite the degree in question being put on the website of the petitioner University for all to see and despite this fact being made expressly clear with precision in the pleadings before this Court and despite the respondent never ever disputing the degree in question either during the pendency of these proceedings or even during final hearing, the respondent No.2 has persisted with the matter. This is one more reason to impose costs while allowing this petition.
    41 Accordingly, petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 29.04.2016 passed in proceeding is quashed and set aside. Respondent No.2 is directed to pay costs of Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with Gujarat State Legal Services Authority within a period of 4 weeks from the date of this judgment.” – Gujarat HC Judgment dated 31.03.2023 – Gujarat University vs. M Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) & 3 other(s) [Sec. 6(1), 8(1)(e) & (j); CM Arvind Kejriwal, Oral request suo motu converted into an RTI application; Educational document is personal information; Personal Information; Penalty on Respondent No.2]
  • Section 24(1)
    — Delhi High Court: “Thus, considering the fact that the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau is clearly exempted under Section 24(1) read with Schedule II of the RTI Act, the direction of the CIC to provide the outcome of the complaint to the Respondent/ RTI Applicant is not sustainable and the same would be contrary to law. Accordingly, the said finding and direction of the CIC is set aside.” –   Delhi HC Judgment dated 25.01.2023 – CPIO, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau Vs. G.S. Srinivasan
  • ACRs/Merit List of Defence Officer
    — Delhi High Court: “15. In the opinion of this Court, the information sought in the present petition would not be liable to be disclosed, owing to the nature of the information i.e., relating to senior personnel in the Navy. The CIC’s order does not warrant any interference.” –  Delhi HC Judgment dated 11.01.2023 – Jagjit Singh Pal Singh Virk Vs. Union of India & Anr. [ACRs/Merit List of Naval Officer] 
  • CIC Decision dated 06.01.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Ms Renu Bala Kochhar Vs. Public Information Officers, DDA, New Delhi – The Commission directed the then PIO through the present PIO to send his/her written submissions to justify as to why action should not be initiated against him/her under Section 20 of the RTI Act for the gross violation of its provisions. Further, in doing so, if any other persons are also responsible for the omission, the then PIO was required to serve a copy of this order on such other persons to ensure that written submissions of all such concerned persons are sent to the Commission. [Section 20; CPIO’s role]

2022

  • CIC Decision dated 25.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Department of Revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others, including Delhi Waqf Board – The Commission, inter alia, directed the CPIO, Delhi Wakf Board, to provide compensation of Rs 25000/- to the Appellant keeping in view the mental agony he faced and man hours and resources he lost due to stonewalling of the information by DWB for almost nine months.
    The Commission has also observed that the highest Court of the country in passing this order (on 13.05.1993 for special financial benefits from public treasury to only Imams and muezzins in the mosques) acted in violation of the provisions of the Constitution, particularly Article 27, which says that the tax payers money will not be used to favour any particular religion.
    The Commission deemed this matter of extreme importance for the unity and integrity of the nation and interfaith harmony, and directed its registry to forward a copy of this order to Hon’ble Union Law Minister with the Commission’s recommendation for suitable action to ensure enforcement of provisions of Articles 25 to 28 of the Constitution of India in letter and spirit, to keep all religions of India at par in terms of payment of monthly remuneration of priests of different religions at the cost of the pubic exchequers (both Central and State) and also other matters. [Sections 5(4), 7(6), Art. 27 of Constitution; Imams of Masjid, Priest of Temple, Delhi Waqf Board]
  • CIC Decision dated 11.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Chitresh Kumar Banjare Vs. PIO (1) Delhi Police & (2) Delhi State Legal Services Authority – CIC: “Yet, it is found that the Appellant has undermined the spirit of the RTI Act by clogging the system with a barrage of RTI applications, merely claiming irregularities within the JNU administration.
    In the light of the aforementioned decisions, and the fact that more than 118 cases of the same Appellant on the same subject matter have so far been adjudicated by different Information Commissioners of this Commission, the Commission is not inclined to entertain any further adjudication on the same subject, since no cause of action subsists under the RTI Act.”
    [Multiple RTI Applications]
  • CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Sura Prasad Pati Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India), Bhubaneswar – Son can’t get details of deceased mother’s pension account without death certificate
    CIC: “… … the appellant was son of family pension holder Smt. Rebati Pati, hence, was entitled to the information sought by him. However, in compliance of the FAA’s order, the appellant had not provided the death certificate of account holder. In case he completes the formalities, the information may be provided to him…” [Sections 8(1)(e) & (j), 20(1); Family Pension Details]
  • CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Rajeev Kumar Agarwal Vs. PIO, CISF – The CIC observed that keeping in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by both the parties the Commission at the outset observes that the CRPF is an organization exempted from the purview of the RTI Act, 2005 as per Section 24 (1) r/w the Second Schedule of the Act and information can only be disclosed in such cases where allegations of corruption or violation of human rights is alleged which the Appellant in the instant case has not justified. The only contention of the Appellant was that the information sought does not pertain to the core activities of the organization which may jeopardize the security of the state Hence, no further intervention was required in this case.
    [Section 24(1); CSIF as an exempted oganisation]
  • CIC Order dated 16.09.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Gautam Saren Vs. CPIO, National Test House, Kolkata – The Commission observed that the reply provided by the then CPIO was inappropriate and that a blanket denial of information under the garb of Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act was inadequate as no personal information of third party has been sought by the Appellant. The Commission admonished the then CPIO for providing such mindless and incongruous replies. Hence, the Commission deemed it fit to direct the present CPIO to provide revised and specific information qua the instant RTI Application to the Appellant. [Sections 8(1)(j), 5(4); Dates of Joining of Officers, National Test House]
  • CIC Decision dated 04.08.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Prakash Gopalan Vs. Public Information Officer, Office of CPMG, Kerala Circle, Deptt. of Posts, Thiruvananthapuram – The Commission directed the concerned PIO to furnish a revised reply to the Appellant, with regards to total period of working in the office as on the specified date, as mentioned in the RTI Application. The PIO was also required by the Commission to make sure that any third-party information or any other information which is exempted from disclosure under RTI Act, 2005 shall not be disclosed to the appellant while providing the said reply. [Section 8(1)(j); Department of Posts]
  • CIC Order dated 01.08.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Anil Kumr Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, Hapur – The Commission noted that the respondent pleaded that they had not received the application dated 27.02.2020. The Commission directed the CPIO to seek necessary assistance and communicate with the appellant in order to respond to the RTI application within the timelines prescribed under the RTI Act. [Section 20(1); Non-Receipt of RTI Application, Canara Bank]
  • CIC Decision dated 06.06.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Dr. Rajiv Khatri Vs. CPIO, University Grants Commission, New Delhi – CIC: “….. the Commission is extremely irked to note that the onus of replying to the instant RTI Application is being shifted across different division of UGC.The Commission expresses severe displeasure for showcasing lackadaisical approach of the Respondent in the instant matter. The Commission further notes that even after an efflux of 2 years of time, the Respondent public authority is yet to ascertain the actual custodian of the information. The Commission treats this as a blatant error and willful violation of the provisions of the RTI Act and the said conduct of the Respondent Authority is highly admonished.”
    [UGC, Grievance Redressal Mechanism in UGC]
  • CIC Decision dated 25.05.2022 on the Second Appeal,Complaint filed by Prasoon Shekhar Vs. CPIO, Bar Council of India, New Delhi – CIC: “The FAA burst into frenzied arguments with the Appellant for bringing up allegations of lack of transparency and for insisting on non-compliance of earlier Commission’s directions. The Commission took exception to the disdainful conduct of the FAA and closed the hearing proceedings.” xxxxx
    The Commission directed the FAA to place this order before their competent authority to ensure that action is expedited with respect to the upgradation of the BCI website while also incorporating the stipulations of the Commission in the H N Pathak case. The Commission also directed the CPIO to reiterate the opportunity of inspection of the available records to the Appellant and facilitate the same on a mutually decided date & time.[Conduct of FAA, Bar Council of India, Inspection of Colleges by BCI]
  • CIC Decision dated 27.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Hari Gupta Vs. CPIO, Office of DG of Income Tax, Lucknow – Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation) is an “Exempted Organization”. CIC: “… no further disclosure in this respect is warranted in the matter in keeping with the provision of Section 24 of the RTI Act.”
    [Sec 24; Tax Evasion Petition (TEP), Exempted Organisation]
  • CIC Decision dated 25.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Savio J.F. Correia Vs. CPIO, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa –  The CIC, inter alia, observed that “The Commission is thus unable to appreciate the square applicability of Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act to the specific information sought for in the RTI Application in the absence of any justification to this effect by the CPIO as required under Section 19(5) of the RTI Act, and therefore the denial of the information is not acceptable.” The Commission, therefore, directed the CPIO to provide the available information under the categories mentioned in the RTI Application in the form of a written reply or an extract wherein only these heads of information figure, as per the provisions of the RTI Act. [Secs. 8(1)(d) & (j), 19(5); Financial Investment by Statutory Body]
  • CIC Decision dated 23.02.2022 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Sh. Nagsen Rajaram Suralkar Vs. Department of Posts, Office of Supdt. of Post Office, Bhuswal, Maharashtra – The CIC, inter alia, observed that the CPIO has erred in providing the caste related information of all the employees in response to point no. 1 of RTI Application to the Appellant without seeking consent of said employees under Section 11 of RTI Act. In this regard, the CPIO was advised to follow due process of law as envisaged under the RTI Act before parting with any information which stands exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act. [Section 8(1)(j); Caste-Related Information of Employees]
  • CIC Decision dated 22.02.2022 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Sh. J.P. Tiwari Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi – The CIC decided that it (the facts of the case) reflected on the then CPIO’s gross non-application of mind and a lackadaisical approach in executing the statutory duty cast upon him by virtue of the RTI Act. Nonetheless, the US & then CPIO was directed by the Commission to send his written explanation stating as to why no effort was invested by him in locating the averred complaint despite being provided with the reference of the relevant CVC’s forwarding note. [Acton Taken, Complaint Matter, File Notings]
  • CIC Order dated 03.01.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Om Prakash Vijaivergia Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Siliguri, Darjeeling, West Bengal – The appellant attended the hearing through audio-call. The respondent, Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, CPIO/ Regional Manager attended the hearing through audio-call. Both the parties submitted their written submissions and the same were taken on record.
    CIC: “8. In view of the above, the Commission hereby issues strict warning to the concerned CPIO for not providing the available information for so long. That the conduct of the concerned CPIO is highly objectionable and same should be brought to the notice of his controlling authority for an appropriate view. He is being reprimanded for future as the information that could have been provided on time, also not provided by the concerned CPIO. That the conduct of the concerned FAA is also found to be lacking as the first appeal has not been disposed off meticulously, therefore the FAA’s conduct should also be examined by its controlling authority.
    9. xxx xxx Further, the Commission observes that if the technical vendor is not cooperating with the CPIO, the controlling authority should take an appropriate view on competence performance of the vendor. …..” [Conduct of the CPIO; FAA]

2021

  • CIC Decision dated 29.10.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Dhavalkumar Kirtikumar Patel Vs. CPIO, National Mission for Manuscripts, New Delhi, and CPIOs of 4 other organisations – The CIC directed the NMM to put  in  public  domain  the  around  3  lakhs  manuscripts  (according  to  the  respondent) which it has digitized so far within a period of one year from the date of receipt of this order. The CIC also directed the NMM  to  allow the  appellant  official access (including downloading) of 30,000 manuscripts it has already put in public domain out of  the  total  around  3  lakhs  manuscript  digitized  so  far. Further, the appellant was required to bear downloading cost which he had offered to bear during the course of hearing. [Manuscripts Catalogued by NMM, Larger Public Interest, Third Party Information]
  • CIC Decision dated 22.10.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Love Gogia Vs. CPIO, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Office of CGM, Pune – The CIC has held that “Under the provisions of Section 19 (5) of the RTI Act, 2005, in an appeal proceeding, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the CPIO. The CPIO in his reply had clearly failed to justify his position as to how the disclosure of information would be in contravention of the  provisions  enshrined  under Section  8 of  the  RTI  Act,  2005  and  what commercial confidence would be breached as the information sought by the appellant is very general in nature.” The CPIO was directed to re-visit the RTI application and provide a revised reply to the appellant and it was also directed that he should note that in case he is unable to justify the exemption so claimed, the sought for information should be provided to the appellant free of cost. [Sections 8(1)(d), 19(5); BSNL’s ERP System]
  • CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare – The CIC decided: “However, in view of the extraordinary predicament the world finds itself in, it is of vital importance that all relevant updates, notifications and information which are likely to serve larger public interest, and address concerns and worries should be widely disseminated to create awareness among the public. The Respondent must note that dissemination of vital information is as much a national duty as proper and effective discharge of their onerous responsibilities.” [Sections 2(f), 6(3), 7(1), 8(1)(a), 19 and 25(5); Centralised Procurement of COVID-19 Vaccines for States, Foreign Aid, Larger Public interest, Life and Liberty Clause, Suo Motu Disclosure]
  • CIC Decision dated 13.08.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Shyamlal Yadav Vs. PIO, CPV Division, Ministry of External Affairs – As per the Decision of CIC, the RTI application was mechanically replied to by the erstwhile CPIO without application of mind. The Commission thus cautioned the erstwhile CPIO and Dy Passport Officer (Ops) to ensure that RTI applications are not dealt with in a casual manner in future. The Commission also directed the incumbent CPIO to re-examine the RTI application and provide the information. [Section 2(f); Passports, CPIO/PIO]
  • CIC Decision dated 17.05.2021 on the Complaint filed by Shri Aniket Gaurav Vs. PIO, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare – CIC: “However, before concluding the decision at hand, the Commission wishes to advise the Respondent to ensure that maximum information which serves larger public interest, is proactively disclosed, to enhance transparency and dissemination of correct information. This will also obviate the need for filing of RTI cases by citizens on matters of such vital importance.” [Sections 4, 18; Covid Vaccination Result Data]
  • CIC Decision dated 23.03.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Department of Social Justice & Empowerment, New Delhi – The CIC observed that “The Commission observes at the outset that the denial of the information in the initial reply of the CPIO under Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act was grossly inappropriate as no justification was provided for invoking the said exemption, in fact, the CPIO merely reproduced the provision of Section 8(1)(i) in his reply to the RTI Application. The said conduct of the CPIO is viewed adversely by the Commission as it is suggestive of his non-application of mind in dealing with the matters under the RTI Act.” The CPIO was severely admonished for the inappropriate denial of the information to the Appellant and he is warned to ensure that due diligence is exercised while dealing with the RTI Applications in future.
    Regarding the prayer of the Appellant regarding the suo motu disclosure of the Cabinet note pertaining to The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 in light of the provisions of Section 4(1)(c) & 4(1)(d) of the RTI Act as well as Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act a copy of the order was marked to the Secretary, MoSJ, to look into the prayer of the Appellant. [Sections 4, 8(1)(i); Cabinet Note, etc., Public Authority]
  • CIC Decision dated 16.02.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Jitendra Kumar vs. CPIO, O/o Income Tax Officer, Aligarh, UP – The Central Information Commission directed the respondent to inform to the appellant the current status of his Tax Evasion Petition and/or if the said TEP has already been disposed of, then, broad outcome of the Tax Evasion Petition should be informed to the appellant as per his RTI application, before transfer of the TEP to the Investigation wing. [Sections 8(1)(j); Tax Evasion Petition]
  • Section 8(1)(h)
    Delhi High Court: It was held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court that “the legal position as settled by this court is that cogent reasons have to be given by the public authority as to how and why the investigation or prosecution will get impaired or hampered by giving the information in question.” [Exemption under Sec. 8(1)(h)]Delhi HC Judgement dated 05.02.2021 – Amit Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi >>> RTI – Court Judgements
  • Section 8(1)(d)
    Delhi High Court: “On the basis of the above judgments, the following principles can be clearly gleaned:
    i) CPIO/PIOs cannot withhold information without reasonable cause;
    xxx       xxx
    v) PIO/CPIO cannot function merely as “post offices” but instead are responsible to ensure that the information sought under the RTI Act is provided
    xxx      xxx
    viii) Information cannot be refused without reasonable cause.”
    [Section 5(3), 5(4), 5(5), 8(1)(d); PIO/CPIO]Delhi HC Judgement dated 22.01.2021 – Sh. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Erstwhile CPIO) Union Bank of India & Ors. Vs. Central Information Commission & Anr.
  • Delhi HC Judgment dated 12.01.2021 – Har Kishan Vs. President Secretariat through its Secretary & Anr. – Delhi High Court: Whenever information is sought under the RTI Act, disclosure of an interest in the information sought would be necessary to establish the bona fides of the applicant. Non-disclosure of the same could result in injustice to several other affected persons, whose information is sought. The petition was dismissed with costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid to the “High Court of Delhi (Middle Income Group) legal Aid Society”. …” [Sections 8(1)(j); Disclosure of an Interest in the Information, Candidatures’ Particulars] – Delhi HC Judgment dated 12.01.2021 – Har Kishan Vs. President Secretariat through its Secretary & Anr.
  • CIC Decision dated 28.12.2020 on the Second Appeals filed by Deeksha Chaudhary Vs. CPIO, Air India Ltd., New Delhi – The CIC decided that it was necessary to ascertain the compliance of the FAA’s order dated 12.11.2018 and that in order to expedite dissemination of the information and ensure compliance of the FAA’s order, it was thus deemed expedient that the 25 second appeals be remanded to the FAA to ensure compliance of his/her earlier order dated 12.11.2018 in response to the Appellant’s first appeals, in order to address the central issue agitated by the Appellant. [Section 7(9); Second Appeals Remanded to FAA]
  • CIC Decision dated 21.12.2020 on the Second Appeal by Vihar Durve Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Mumbai – CIC: “The Commission upholds the contention of the respondent that in the disclosure of the names of the donors and donees of electoral bonds from books of accounts may be in contravention of the provisions contained under section 8 (1) (e) and (j) of RTI Act. There appears to be no larger public interest overriding the right to privacy of the donors and donees concerned.” [Sections 8(1)(e) & (j); Donors & Donees of Electoral Bonds, Larger Public Interest]
  • CIC Decision dated 06.11.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Rahmat Bano Vs. Office of Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan – CIC: “9. Taking into consideration the aforementioned analysis and the judgments of the Higher Courts, the Commission directs the respondent to inform the appellant about the generic details of the net taxable income/gross income of her husband held and available with the Public Authority for the period 2017-2018 ….
    10. The details/copy of income tax returns and other personal information of third party need not to be disclosed to the appellant except as mentioned at para no. 9 above.[Sections 8(1)(j), 19(3); Copy of Husband’s ITRs]
  • CIC Decision dated 05.11.2020 on the Complaint filed by Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Mumbai – CIC: “The CPIO cannot be expected to examine and make judgement to find out the name of the official and then provide him report of the controlling authority, reasons for non-disposal including name, official mobile number and designation of their controlling authority. xxx   xxx In light of the factual matrix of these cases and the legal principles enunciated in the aforementioned case-laws, this Commission comes to the conclusion that no action under Section 20 of the RTI Act, 2005 is warranted in these cases.[Sections 18, 18(1)(e), 20; Penalty on CPIO pressed by the Complainant]
  • CIC Decision dated 30.10.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Shri Kuldeep Kumar Baranwal v. CPIO, Prime Minister’s Office, New Delhi – As per the CIC Decision, the queries of the Appellant were vague, hypothetical, clarificatory and interpretative in nature which do not fall within the definition of information/right to information as per Section 2 (f)/(j) of the RTI Act, 2005. The Appellant was advised to strictly refrain in future from seeking information under the RTI Act by filing such applications before offices which do not ordinarily possess the relevant information. [Section 2(f), 2(j), 8(1) (d), or (j); Improper Use of RTI Act]
  • CIC Decision dated 16.09.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Mahendra Singh Vs. PIO/SDM (Narela), Naya Bans, Delhi through Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Consultant of PIO -A significant aspect of this case is that it was remanded back to FAA by the CIC and that the Respondent was represented by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, consultant/representative of the PIO through audio conference.
    CIC: “Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during hearing, Commission observes that the Appellant is not satisfied with the information provided by the Respondent. It is further observed that the Appellant has brought in certain aspects during the hearing which is outside the adjudicatory powers of the Commission.
    Hence, Commission deems it fit to remand the instant case back to Shri Tanvir Ahmed, FAA/ADM-North to provide a fair hearing to the relevant parties i.e., Appellant, Respondent and the BDO concerned and pass a reasoned, speaking order by 31.12.2020.. ..” [Agricultural Land]
  • Delhi HC Judgment dated 31.08.2020 – Dr. R.S. Gupta Vs. Govt. of NCTD & Ors. – Delhi High Court: In absence of even a remote connection with any larger public interest, disclosure of information would be exempted as the same would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual under section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act. [Sections 7, 8(1)(j); Attendance Record] – Delhi HC Judgment dated 31.08.2020 – Dr. R.S. Gupta Vs. Govt. of NCTD & Ors..
  • CIC Decision dated 26.08.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Meeta Agrawal Vs. CPIO, DGM(G) & Nodal PIO, North Central Railway, RTI Cell, Subedarganj, Allahabad -In light of the Delhi High Court Judgment dated 24.11.2014 [in the case of Naresh Trehan v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (W.P(C) 85/2010)], and considering the facts of the case, the Commission observed that the grounds for the cancellation of the tender, the minutes and approval of the competent authority must be made available to a tender participant as non-disclosure of the same would have affected the competitive as well as personal interest of the said participant. The Commission, therefore, directed the respondent to provide requisite information on point nos. 1, 3 and 4, after redacting information which related to commercial confidence or personal information of third parties, the disclosure of which is exempted under Section 8(1) (d), or (j) of the RTI Act, to the appellant. [Section 8(1) (d), or (j); Minutes of the Tender Committee, Approval of the Competent Authority]
  • CIC Decision dated 23.07.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Saurav Das Vs. CPIOs, ICMR, and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi – CIC: ” … it is the considered  view of the Commission that authentic, verified and cogent reply based on factual information needs to be furnished to the Complainant as also disclose on the Public Authority website for the benefit of public at large. The fact that the application shuttled from one Division of the Public Authority to another indicates that there is a very urgent requirement for not only notifying a Nodal Authority in the M/o H&FW to compile, collate and consolidate the information sought in the RTI application but to effectively act and suo motu upload the same on its website in compliance with Section-4 of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, the Commission advises the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare to have this matter examined at an appropriate level and the Nodal Authority so notified should furnish all the details sought by the Complainant in a clear, cogent and precise manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order depending upon the condition for containment of the Corona Virus Pandemic in the Country or through email.”  [Sections 4, 6(3), 8(1)(a); Coronavirus-related Information]
  • CIC Decision dated 20.07.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Smt. Savitri Devi Vs. PIO, NDMC, Narela Zone, New Delhi – In order to ensure social distancing and prevent the spread of the pandemic, COVID-19, audio hearings (audio conferencing) were scheduled by the Hon’ble Central Information Commission after giving prior notice to both the parties.
    The Commission observed that the PIO had made a mockery of the FAA’s order by merely re-sending the initial PIO reply, which had not been received by the Appellant till the date of hearing. The Commission directed the PIO to furnish a comprehensive status report with respect to the property under reference by the specified date failing which action would be initiated against the PIO as per the provisions of the RTI Act. [Immovable Property; PIO]
  • CIC Decision dated 10.07.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Basavantamma Vs. CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Bengaluru – CIC : 14. … “… this Commission after considering the factual matrix of the case is of the opinion that in the absence of any larger public interest in the matter, the appellant is not entitled to seek the details of the Income Tax Returns filed by the third party, Mr. G H Sharanappa which is exempted u/Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005.
    It is to be noted that the appellant has requested this Commission for disclosure of at least the ‘gross income’ of Mr. G H Sharanappa so that she could defend her matrimonial case. Therefore, considering the aspect of marital discord between the husband and wife vis-à-vis her right of maintenance, this Commission is of the opinion that the respondent should consider providing only the limited information of the last six years, i.e. the numerical figure(s) of the ‘gross income’ of her husband, Mr. G H Sharanappa …” [Sections 8(1)(j), 19(3),20; Income Tax Return Details of Spouse]
  • CIC Decision dated 24.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Shri Baljeet Singh Vs. CPIO, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh (Haryana) – The CIC decided that the CPIO erred in stating that no information was asked, whereas the information sought was specific and it is relevant to mention that right to information includes right to inspect also. The CIC directed the CPIO to provide a revised reply to the appellant in respect of point no. 3 of the RTI application. In point No.3, the applicant had sought a copy of the Minutes of Meetings of the Committee constituted for considering promotions, held from 01 January 2018 to 30 April 2019, for considering promotion/selection of non-teaching staff (posts). [Section 8(1)(j); Minutes of DPC/Committee]
  • CIC Decision dated 22.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. CPIO, Office of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Settlement Commission, Mumbai/Kolkata/New Delhi/Chennai – The CIC, in view of the facts and upon hearing the parties at great length came to the conclusion that ‘right to information’ under the RTI Act, 2005 also includes right to obtain accessible information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device. Therefore, denial of accessible information in the CD/DVD format under the RTI Act, 2005 could not be upheld by the CIC. [Sections 2(j)(iv), 4(2), Rule 15 of the Customs and Excise Settlement Commission Procedure 2007; Copies of orders passed by the Settlement Commission, no. of orders passed, etc.].
  • CIC Decision dated 05.06.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi – The Complainant vide his RTI application sought information on 05 points regarding the district-wise number of hospitals and healthcare facilities called by any other name, designated as COVID-19 treatment centers as on date; postal addresses and telephone numbers of the hospitals and healthcare facilities and other issues related thereto. The complainant, Mr. Venkatesh Nayak, attended the hearing through WhatsApp.
    From the Respondent’s side, the hearing was attended by Dr. Sandeep Sharma, CPIO (SJH), Mr. Mahesh Mangla, CAPIO, SJH, Dr. R. Laxmi Narayan, ADG, ICMR, Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Prof. Chest Med. LHMC, Dr. U.B. Das, CMO, DGHS in person; Mr. Rajender Kumar, US, PH Division, M/o H&FW and Mr. G.P. Samanta, CPIO & US (Hospital-D) (SJH, RML and LHMC) through WhatsApp/TC. Expressing its displeasure at the state of affairs, the CIC advised the Secretary, M/o H&FW to designate an officer of an appropriate seniority as a Nodal Officer to examine the matter and suo motu disclose the information sought in the RTI application on the website of the Public Authority within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order in the larger public interest. [Section 4(1); Distt.-Wise No. of Hospitals for Covid Treatment]
  • CIC Order dated 03.06.2020 on the Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai – The Appellant and the Respondent were not present during the course of the hearing. The CIC ordered as under:-
    “6. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, feels that it is necessary for both parties to be present for proper adjudication of the issues raised in the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is adjourned.” [Sections 8(1)(a)&(d), 11(1),20(1); Appeal from Public Authority]
  • CIC Decision dated 01.05.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Anil Sood Vs. CPIO & Nodal Officer, Office of Central Govt. Health Scheme. R.K. Puram Sector 12, New Delhi-22 – The complainant attended the hearing through WhatsApp.
    The CIC in the case of the complaint filed by Mr. Anil Sood Vs. CPIO & Nodal Officer of Central Govt. Health Scheme, R.K. Puram Sector 12, New Delhi-22, observed on May 01, 2020 that there was complete negligence and laxity in the public authority (CGHS) in dealing with the RTI applications. It is abundantly clear that such matters are being ignored and set aside without application of mind which reflected disrespect towards the RTI Act, 2005 itself. The Commission expressed its displeasure on the casual and callous approach adopted by the respondent (CGHS) in responding to the RTI application. It was felt that the conduct of Respondent was against the spirit of the RTI Act, 2005 which was enacted to ensure greater transparency and effective access to the information.  [PIO, Public Authority, CGHS, Supply of Medicines to WCs]
  • CIC Decision dated 24.04.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Kairun BiBi Vs. CPIO, Steel Authority of India, Dhanbad [Sections 19(3), 20; CPIO (Warning to CPIO)]
  • CIC Decision dated 23.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO & Dy. GM (Legal), Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., New Delhi [Section 20(1); ATR, File Notings, CPIO, Public Authority]
  • CIC Decision dated 22.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi  – The CIC in the case of the complaint by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi, decided on April 22, 2020, as under:-
    (i)         An advisory was issued u/s 25(5) of the RTI Act to the Secretary DoPT to evolve a system after coordinating with the Director General, NIC in the spirit of the RTI Act and take immediate steps towards providing a platform for implementation of Sec 7(1) of the RTI Act.
    (ii)         A report on the action taken on the advisory might be sent to the Commission by the Secretary, DoPT within 7 days from the date of withdrawal of lockdown. Due to the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus in the country and the prevalent lock down, the Commission found it appropriate to highlight the issue of Sec 7(1) implementation by citizens more so, when postal receipt of RTI applications are minimal, in such situations all public authorities should encourage RTI applications through e-mail in case of life and liberty matter.
    (iii)        A unique e-mail id can be created by the CPIOs in this regard and reflected in their respective website. A method of online acceptance of RTI fees also has to be thought of in this regard. In so far as other normal RTIs are concerned, the RTI portal can be used. The Deputy Registrar was directed to  circulate this order widely to the public authorities related to the Registry. [Sections 4(1)(b), 7(1), 19(1), 25(5); Sports Quota, Delhi University, Public Authority, Minutes of Meeting]
  • CIC Decision dated 19.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Ajay Manda Vs. CPIO, Ch. Charan Singh National Institute of Agriculture Marketing, Jaipur – CIC: “Therefore, without commenting on the merits of the rival contentions made by the parties, the Commission deems it appropriate to dismiss this appeal, as voluminous information was sought for which replies have been provided and any further requirement for disclosure would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority. The appellant is advised to be responsible and avoid filing repeated RTI applications seeking voluminous information.” – [Section 7(9); Habitual RTI Applicant]
  •  CIC Decision dated 17.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. D.T. Eshwaran Vs. CPIO, Central Govt. Employees Welfare Housing Organization, New Delhi – The Commission expressed extreme displeasure at the conduct of the CPIO in flouting the FAA’s order. Hence, the concerned CPIO was issued a strict warning to be careful in future with regard to the observations, made in the Decision. The present CPIO was directed to serve a copy of this order to the then CPIO for his information and in case such kind of lapse is repeated in future, the Commission decided that it would be constrained to initiate penal action against him under the relevant provisions of the RTI Act.
    The Hon’ble Commission also directed the present CPIO to comply with the direction given by the FAA. It was also ordered by the Hon’ble Commission that the CPIO should note that at this stage he cannot transfer the RTI application, however, he could obtain information from its custodian after seeking assistance u/s 5(4) of the RTI Act. It was further ordered that the onus was now on him to obtain the required information and provide it to the appellant as per the timeline specified in the Decision. [Sections 5(4), 20; CPIO, Construction Work]
  • Certified Copies of Court Documents
    SC: “42. … … In the absence of inherent inconsistency between the provisions of the RTI  Act and other law, overriding effect of RTI Act would not apply.
    (ii) The information to be accessed/certified copies on the judicial side to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the High Court Rules, the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to.” – (Secs. 2, 4(b), 6(2), 8(1)(a) to (j), 19, 22, 31; Disclosure of Information; Certified Copies of Court Documents)-  SC Judgment dated 04.03.2020 – Chief Information Commissioner v. High Court of Gujarat and Another >>>  RTI – Court Judgements
  • CIC Decision dated 21.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Amit Khera v. CPIO, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Delhi. Keeping in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by both the parties and in the light of the decisions cited in the Decision, the Commission instructed the Respondent (HPCL) to disclose the broad outcome of the investigation redacting information exempted under Section 8 (1) of the RTI Act, 2005 to the Appellant as also suo moto disclose the same on their website. – [Sections 2(f), 2(j), 8(1)(d); Investigation Report]
  • Section 2 * Section 3 * Section 4 * Section 5 * Section 6 * Sections 7(6) and 7(9) * Sections 8 * Section 10 * Section 11 * Section 18 * Section 19 * Section 20 * Section 22 * Section 24 * Section 25 * Rule 3 RTI Rules, 2012 * Constitution * CrPC
  • Go to RTI – Rules/Circulars (Chronological Order).
    Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise
    Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise

    Section 2

    Section 2(f) – Definition of ‘Information’

      CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ram Meena vs. PIO, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, I.P. Estate, New Delhi (324.5 KiB, 793 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab (630.8 KiB, 1,190 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,515 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.08.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Shyamlal Yadav Vs. PIO, CPV Division, Ministry of External Affairs (729.2 KiB, 2,464 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.10.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Shri Kuldeep Kumar Baranwal v. CPIO, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi (489.0 KiB, 3,427 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Amit Khera v. CPIO, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Delhi (253.6 KiB, 3,972 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Rana Ranjan v. CPIO, National Insurance Company Ltd., Bhavnagar, Gujarat (221.4 KiB, 3,711 hits)

      Delhi High Court judgment dated 17.12.2019 - Election Commission of India Vs. Central Information Commission and Anr. (364.3 KiB, 4,212 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Razaak K. Haider v. CPIO Election Commission of India, New Delhi (666.2 KiB, 6,086 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms Seema Jain v. PIO, Department of Posts (99.1 KiB, 3,726 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.12.2018 - Mr. R.S. Rai v. CPIO, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Jabalpur (173.2 KiB, 6,963 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.12.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sounder Rajan v. CPIO, IDBI Bank Limited, Mumbai (128.8 KiB, 6,833 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.12.2018 - Nirmal Singh Dhiman v. CPIO, Deptt. of Ex-Servicemen, New Delhi (148.8 KiB, 6,892 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Min. of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi (483.5 KiB, 6,785 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 12.02.2018 - Paras Nath Singh Vs. Union of India (266.0 KiB, 10,897 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Anil Sood Vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Election), Govt. of NCT of Delhi (368.4 KiB, 11,390 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 13,234 hits)

      Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 12.03.2014 - Shri Omprakash Kashiram Vs. Prime Minister's Office (209.9 KiB, 998 hits)

      Decision dated 18.02.2014 - Pramod Ganpat Sawant Vs. DOP&T, New Delhi (395.6 KiB, 1,064 hits)

      Decision dated 13.02.2014 - R.K. Prasad Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (317.1 KiB, 928 hits)

      Decision dated 23.10.2013 - Shri V.K. Pandey, Kolkata Vs. LIC of India, Kolkata (91.7 KiB, 1,085 hits)

      Decision dated 27.09.2013 - Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 1,242 hits)

      Decision dated 04.09.2013 - Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 1,174 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2013 - Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 1,126 hits)

      Decision dated 14.08.2013 - Shri K. Madhavan, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 1,005 hits)

      Decision dated 05.08.2013 - Shri S. Joseph Balasundar, Chennai Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 1,091 hits)

      Decision dated 05.07.2013 - Shri B.Bharathi, Puducherry Vs. PIO, Madras High Court, Chennai (306.4 KiB, 1,045 hits)

      Decision dated 14.06.2013 - Shri Shyam Sunder Singh Vs. National Human Rights Commission (198.7 KiB, 1,133 hits)

      Decision dated 10.05.2013 - Ms. Medha Rani, Chandigarh Vs. CPI, CBI, Chandigarh (208.2 KiB, 940 hits)

      Decision dated 12.04.2013 - Shri Harishankar Tiwari Vs. Minsitry of Law & Justice, New Delhi (194.1 KiB, 1,012 hits)

      Decision dated 31.08.2012 - Shri Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 1,014 hits)

      Decision dated 15.05.2012 - Shri Vijay Gupta Vs. Delhi Police (216.0 KiB, 1,260 hits)

      Decision dated 04.04.2012 - Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 1,295 hits)

      Decision dated 03.04.2012 - Shri Ram M. Apte, Balgaum Vs. CPIO, High Court of Karnakatak, Bangaluru (204.9 KiB, 1,159 hits)

      Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri S.P. Goyal Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (195.4 KiB, 1,082 hits)

      Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 1,298 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 1,265 hits)

      Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 1,272 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 1,314 hits)

    — Section 2(h) – Definition of ‘Public Authority’

      CIC Decision dated 06.12.2019 on the Complaint filed by Neeraj Sharma v. CPIO, National Payments Corporation of India, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (1.0 MiB, 3,648 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.07.2017 on the complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Bindal Vs. Delhi Lawn Tennis Association(uploaded on CIC website on 19.04.2018) (12.2 MiB, 8,202 hits)

      DoPT Notification dated 04.12.2017-Appointment of 17 SCS officers to the IAS (UP Cadre) (105.5 KiB, 1,004 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.09.2017 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Shailesh Gandhi, Shri Madhukar Ganpat Kukde and Shri Nimish S. Agarwal Vs. CDR Cell, IDBI Tower, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (16.9 MiB, 7,503 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 04.09.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ashwani Kumar Avasthi Vs. The CPIO, SBI, Mumbai & Director/GM, IBPS, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (9.0 MiB, 7,421 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Hemant Dhage Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (656.2 KiB, 11,869 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.09.2015 on Appeal from Shri Biswamber Nayak Vs. Batra Hospital & Medical Research Centre, New Delhi (519.8 KiB, 9,202 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.06.2014 on the Appeal filed by Lt. Gen. S.S. Dahiya Vs. CPIO, Appellate Authority, Air Hqrs., New Delhi (233.9 KiB, 8,115 hits)

      Decision dated 05.08.2013 - Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) (403.9 KiB, 2,152 hits)

      Decision dated 04.07.2013 - Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 2,011 hits)

      Decision dated 03.06.2013 - Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 2,169 hits)

    — Section 2(i)

      CIC Decision dated 30.10.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Shri Kuldeep Kumar Baranwal v. CPIO, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi (489.0 KiB, 3,427 hits)

      Delhi High Court judgment dated 17.12.2019 - Election Commission of India Vs. Central Information Commission and Anr. (364.3 KiB, 4,212 hits)

    [download id=”12977″]

    — Section 2 (j) Meaning of ‘Right to Information’

      CIC Decision dated 22.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. CPIO, Office of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Settlement Commission, Mumbai/Kolkata/New Delhi/Chennai (584.0 KiB, 3,480 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Amit Khera v. CPIO, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Delhi (253.6 KiB, 3,972 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.02.2017 on Appeal filed by Shri Gopal Rao Gudi Vs.PIO, National Council of Science Museum (58.4 KiB, 11,149 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,566 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 13,234 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 14,603 hits)

      Decision dated 05.08.2013 - Shri S. Joseph Balasundar, Chennai Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 1,091 hits)

      Decision dated 05.07.2013 - Shri B.Bharathi, Puducherry Vs. PIO, Madras High Court, Chennai (306.4 KiB, 1,045 hits)

      Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. CPIO & General Manager, RBI, Mumbai (71.8 KiB, 1,056 hits)

    — Section 2(n)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on Appeal filed by Madhu Vs. PIO & Sr. DMM, DRM Office, Northern Railway, New Delhi (484.7 KiB, 9,783 hits)

    — PIO/CPIO Not Expected To Give Interpretation/Justification/Opinion

      Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Ramesh Kumar Anand, Steno., PGIMER, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, PGIMER, Chandigarh (44.6 KiB, 1,225 hits)

    Section 3

      Delhi High Court judgment dated 17.12.2019 - Election Commission of India Vs. Central Information Commission and Anr. (364.3 KiB, 4,212 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 15,033 hits)

      Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 13,166 hits)

      Decision dated 11.12.2014 - Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 859 hits)

      Decision dated 26.11.2014 - Shri Rohit Sabharwal Vs. Delhi Fire Service, GNCTD, Delhi (334.1 KiB, 976 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Shri V.K. Jha Vs. Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (317.5 KiB, 1,046 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 14,527 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 1,003 hits)

      Decision dated 22.10.2014 - Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 939 hits)

      Decision dated 10.10.2014 - Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board (208.1 KiB, 14,500 hits)

      Decision dated 20.08.2014 - Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 14,753 hits)

      Decision dated 23.05.2014 - Ms. Meenu Kumari Vs. Delhi State Service Selection Board, Delhi (256.9 KiB, 838 hits)

      Decision dated 17.04.2014 - Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 872 hits)

    Section 4 – Obligations of public authorities

    Section 4

      CIC Decision dated 17.05.2021 on the Complaint filed by Shri Aniket Gaurav Vs. PIO, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (15.8 MiB, 2,595 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.03.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Department of Social Justice & Empowerment, New Delhi (138.3 KiB, 2,806 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.07.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Saurav Das Vs. CPIOs, ICMR, and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (277.4 KiB, 3,361 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.06.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (312.0 KiB, 3,075 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2019 on the Appeal filed by Mr. Kantilal B. Chavda v. CPIO, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat (225.6 KiB, 7,165 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.12.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sounder Rajan v. CPIO, IDBI Bank Limited, Mumbai (128.8 KiB, 6,833 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,788 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,566 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 13,166 hits)

      Decision dated 07.01.2014 - Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi (322.2 KiB, 9,219 hits)

      Decision dated 03.06.2013 - Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 2,169 hits)

      Decision dated 30.04.2012 - Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 1,055 hits)

      Decision dated 12.01.2012 - Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 1,008 hits)

      Decision dated 22.09.2011 - Mr. Ankur Goyal, JNU, New Delhi Vs. JS, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (76.8 KiB, 1,000 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. D.K. Bhaumik, Kolkata Vs. CPIO & GM, SIDBI, Lucknow (68.3 KiB, 1,308 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 1,314 hits)

    — Section 4(1)(a)

      CIC Decision dated 22.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Bhramanand Mishra Vs. PIO, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Lucknow (517.0 KiB, 12,113 hits)

    — Section 4(1)(b)

      CIC Decision dated 22.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi (884.2 KiB, 3,294 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2019 on the Appeal filed by D. Sounderraj v. CPIO, Air India, Air Transport Services Ltd., Mumbai (174.4 KiB, 5,830 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 20.11.2017 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Shailesh Gandhi Vs. The CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office Building, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (697.7 KiB, 9,717 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.08.2017 on the Appeal file by Sh. RK Jain, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (358.6 KiB, 9,588 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.02.2017 on Appeal filed by Shri Gopal Rao Gudi Vs.PIO, National Council of Science Museum (58.4 KiB, 11,149 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Rameshwar Das Bhankhar Vs. Kendrya Vidyalaya Sansthan, N. Delhi (293.6 KiB, 11,121 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Hemant Dhage Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (656.2 KiB, 11,869 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Nirmal Kanta Vs. Laxmi Bai College, Delhi University (300.9 KiB, 8,134 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Anil Sood Vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Election), Govt. of NCT of Delhi (368.4 KiB, 11,390 hits)

      Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 802 hits)

      Decision dated 25.06.2014 - Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi (450.2 KiB, 13,108 hits)

    Section 4(1)(c)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Ms. Monika Singh Vs. Family Welfare Deptt., Govt. of NCT of Delhi (291.4 KiB, 11,052 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.10.2015 on Appeal from Mr. David George Thomas Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests (264.7 KiB, 9,667 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 13,317 hits)

      Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi (258.2 KiB, 14,551 hits)

    Section 4(1)(d)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.10.2015 on Appeal from Mr. David George Thomas Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests (264.7 KiB, 9,667 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 13,317 hits)

    Section 4(2)

      CIC Decision dated 22.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. CPIO, Office of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Settlement Commission, Mumbai/Kolkata/New Delhi/Chennai (584.0 KiB, 3,480 hits)

    Section 5
    — Section 5(3), 5(4), 5(5)

      CIC Decision dated 25.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Department of Revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others, including Delhi Waqf Board (433.8 KiB, 2,426 hits)

    Delhi High Court: “On the basis of the above judgments, the following principles can be clearly gleaned:
    i) CPIO/PIOs cannot withhold information without reasonable cause;
    xxx       xxx
    v) PIO/CPIO cannot function merely as “post offices” but instead are responsible to ensure that the information sought under the RTI Act is provided
    xxx      xxx
    viii) Information cannot be refused without reasonable cause.”
    [Section 5(3), 5(4), 5(5), 8(1)(d); PIO/CPIO]

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 22.01.2021 - Sh. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Erstwhile CPIO) Union Bank of India & Ors. Vs. Central Information Commission & Anr. (889.7 KiB, 4,156 hits)

    — Section 5 (4)

      CIC Order dated 16.09.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Gautam Saren Vs. CPIO, National Test House, Kolkata (1.4 MiB, 2,915 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 17.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. D.T. Eshwaran Vs. CPIO, Central Govt. Employees Welfare Housing Organization, New Delhi (500.9 KiB, 3,285 hits)

    [
    download id=”11919″]

      Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi (128.6 KiB, 14,515 hits)

      Decision dated 16.04.2014 - Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 917 hits)

    Section 6
    Section 6(1)

      Gujarat HC Judgment dated 31.03.2023 - Gujarat University vs. M Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) & 3 other(s) (796.5 KiB, 1,900 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.10.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Shri Kuldeep Kumar Baranwal v. CPIO, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi (489.0 KiB, 3,427 hits)

      Delhi High Court judgment dated 17.12.2019 - Election Commission of India Vs. Central Information Commission and Anr. (364.3 KiB, 4,212 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Razaak K. Haider v. CPIO Election Commission of India, New Delhi (666.2 KiB, 6,086 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.04.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Sucheta Sureshkumar Vs. PIO, EPFO, Mumbai (61.1 KiB, 10,515 hits)

      Decision dated 29.04.2013 - Shri Nitesh Kumar Tripathy, JNU, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, President' Sectt., New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 932 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Chandrakant C. Anandpara, Chairman, Consumer Care Forum, Mumbai Vs. PIO, Bank of India, Walkeshwar Branch, Mumbai (48.1 KiB, 877 hits)

    Section 6(2)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      Decision dated 08.05.2013 - Shri S. Kumar Minz, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, All India Radio, Patna (210.0 KiB, 975 hits)

    Section 6 (3) Transfer of Application to Another Public Authority  [

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,515 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.07.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Saurav Das Vs. CPIOs, ICMR, and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (277.4 KiB, 3,361 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.06.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Mandeep V. CPIO, Bureau of Immigration, New Delhi, CPIO, IB, New Delhi (641.0 KiB, 5,181 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,674 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.08.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms. Rashi Agrawal Vs. CPIO, SPMCIL, New Delhi, CPIO, Indian Security Press, Nashik (165.0 KiB, 6,816 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 18.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Neeraj Sharma Vs. CPIO, Rajya Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (55.6 KiB, 7,915 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 27.12.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Harinder Dhingra Vs. PIO, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (141.4 KiB, 10,010 hits)

      Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 13,166 hits)

      Decision dated 02.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal Vs. PIO, Dy. Land & Development Officer, Min. of Urban Development, New Delhi (45.4 KiB, 739 hits)

      Decision dated 17.07.2014 - Shri Sudhir Goyal, Dehradun Vs. PMO, New Delhi (129.0 KiB, 830 hits)

      Decision dated 04.09.2013 - Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 1,174 hits)

      Decision dated 10.07.2013 - Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 1,882 hits)

      Decision dated 08.07.2013 - Dr. Jitendra Nath Gupta, Delhi Vs. Coordinating Officer, Monitoring Committee, Supreme Court, New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 811 hits)

      Decision dated 09.03.2012 - Shri Abhi Ghosh, Kolkata Vs. Air India Ltd., New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 981 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. L.S.R. Murthy, Hyderabad Vs. PIO&AGM, UCO Bank, Hyderabad (47.1 KiB, 998 hits)

      Decision dated 29.09..2011 - Mr. P.P. Kapoor Vs. Deptt. of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (216.7 KiB, 862 hits)

      Decision dated 22.09.2011 - Mr. L.C. Sonewane, Bhilai Vs. CPIO & CGM, RBI, Mumbai (103.1 KiB, 904 hits)

    — Section 6

      CIC Decision dated 20.11.2017 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Shailesh Gandhi Vs. The CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office Building, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (697.7 KiB, 9,717 hits)

    Section 7
    — Section 7

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,788 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

    Section 7(1)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,515 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi (884.2 KiB, 3,294 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 26.04.2019 on the Complaint filed by Monish Gulati v. CPIO, Ministry of Civil Aviation, New Delhi (177.6 KiB, 5,756 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.03.2017 on Second Appeal filed by Amrika Bai V. PIO, EPFO, Raipur (84.2 KiB, 10,251 hits)

      Decision dated 27.09.2013 - Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 1,242 hits)

      Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,221 hits)

      Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 1,107 hits)

    Section 7(3)

      CIC Decision dated 14.09.2017 on the Appeal filed by Shri R.B. Patil Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (51.8 KiB, 9,892 hits)

      Decision dated 27.09.2013 - Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 1,242 hits)

    — Section 7(6) – Providing the information free of cost

      CIC Decision dated 25.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Department of Revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others, including Delhi Waqf Board (433.8 KiB, 2,426 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,674 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri S.P. Sinha Vs APIO, Min. of Shipping, MMD, Mumbai (60.6 KiB, 6,936 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,566 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.08.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sunhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. PIO, Min. of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi (259.0 KiB, 10,388 hits)

      Decision dated 27.09.2013 - Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 1,242 hits)

      Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,221 hits)

      Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 1,107 hits)

      Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. K. Karthirmathiyon, Secy., Coimbatore Consumer Cause, Coimbatore Vs. PIO & JS, Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.4 KiB, 1,089 hits)

      Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 989 hits)

      Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. Asstt. IG, Min. of Environment & Forest, New Delhi (90.6 KiB, 947 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. Nemi Chand Jain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & DGM, United Bank of India, Guwahati (37.8 KiB, 942 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 1,185 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. G.B. Chandulal, Rajkot Vs. PIO & GM, Dena Bank, Mumbai (39.3 KiB, 1,027 hits)

      Decision dated 31.10.2011 - Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 985 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 1,213 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 1,207 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 1,131 hits)

      Decision dated 29.09.2011 - Mr. G. Ramesh Reddy, Kurnool, AP Vs. CPIO, CGM, NABARD, Hyderabad (47.3 KiB, 922 hits)

      Decision dated 22.09.2011 - Mr. L.C. Sonewane, Bhilai Vs. CPIO & CGM, RBI, Mumbai (103.1 KiB, 904 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 786 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mr. A.M. Attar, Mumbai Vs. PIO & GZM, Bank of India, Mumbai (181.1 KiB, 932 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Mohit Paul, New Delhi Vs. PIO&DGM, Bank of India, Mumbai (59.3 KiB, 1,268 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 910 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. D.K. Bhaumik, Kolkata Vs. CPIO & GM, SIDBI, Lucknow (68.3 KiB, 1,308 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Delhi Vs. PIO&Supdg. Engineer, MCD, New Delhi (44.7 KiB, 740 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 929 hits)

      Decision dated 11.07.2011 - Mr. Mahinder Singh, AD, ESIC, New Delhi Vs. PIO, ESIC, Indore (57.9 KiB, 875 hits)

      Decision dated 07.07.2011 - Mr. Krishnanand Tripathi, Sr. Correspondent, Live India, New Delhi Vs. Mr. Anil Palta, CPIO&DIG, CBI, New Delhi (142.5 KiB, 1,101 hits)

    — Section 7 (9) – Information to be provided in the form sought unless it would cause disproportional diversion of resources

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab (630.8 KiB, 1,190 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.12.2020 on the Second Appeals filed by Deeksha Chaudhary Vs. CPIO, Air India Ltd., New Delhi (1.2 MiB, 3,075 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Ajay Manda Vs. CPIO, Ch. Charan Singh National Institute of Agriculture Marketing, Jaipur (260.7 KiB, 3,446 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 26.03.2019 on the Appeal filed by Nutan Thakur v. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (164.3 KiB, 6,166 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 10,016 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 01.09.2016 on Appeal filed by A.B.S.J. Rao (ESM), Kakinada District, AP Vs. CPIO, NCC Group Hq., Kakinad District, A.P. (54.9 KiB, 10,530 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.04.2015 on Appeal from Surender Vishwakarma Vs. Department of Justice, GOI, New Delhi (248.6 KiB, 13,307 hits)

      Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 14,767 hits)

      Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 12,993 hits)

      Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 19.12.2014 - Shri Jai Prakash Deep Vs. CPIO, India Oil Corporation Ltd., Bhopal (331.9 KiB, 940 hits)

      Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 1,103 hits)

      Decision dated 24.04.2014 - Shri Dipak J. Gandhi Vs. Supreme Court (52.2 KiB, 8,233 hits)

      Decision dated 19.02.2014 - Mr. Anand Mohan Vs. Deptt. of Admn. Reforms & PG Grievances (64.1 KiB, 810 hits)

      Decision dated 15.11.2013 - Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 1,053 hits)

      Decision dated 15.11.2013 - Harkrishan Das Nijhawan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (96.5 KiB, 947 hits)

      Decision dated 14.06.2013 - Shri Shyam Sunder Singh Vs. National Human Rights Commission (198.7 KiB, 1,133 hits)

      Decision dated 31.08.2012 - Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Ministry of Law & Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (195.3 KiB, 898 hits)

      Decision dated 31.08.2012 - Shri Ravi Malpani, Ratlam, M.P. Vs. SSC, New Delhi (204.9 KiB, 879 hits)

      Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri Manoranjan S. Roy, Mumbai Vs CPIO, Mumbai DRT No.2, Mumbai (302.0 KiB, 879 hits)

      Decision dated 23.12.2011 - Mr. S.P. Goyal, Mumbai Vs. PIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (49.1 KiB, 903 hits)

      Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 989 hits)

      Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. K.G. Krishnamoorthy, Mayiladuthari Vs. PIO, Indian Bank, Chennai (55.4 KiB, 836 hits)

      Decision dated 16.09.2011 - Smt. Hazra Bee Vs. Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, New Delhi (231.2 KiB, 808 hits)

    Sections 8 – Exemption from disclosure of information

    — Section 8(1)

      Decision dated 05.05.2014 - Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 1,355 hits)

      Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Mr. A.K. Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO & Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (62.9 KiB, 1,070 hits)

    — Section 8(1)(a) – Information prejudicially affecting sovereignty/integrity of India, security/strategic/scientific/economic interests of the State, etc. 

      CIC Order dated 12.01.2024 on the second appeal filed by Mandeep Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, Bengaluru (174.9 KiB, 529 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,515 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.07.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Saurav Das Vs. CPIOs, ICMR, and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (277.4 KiB, 3,361 hits)

      CIC Order dated 03.06.2020 on the Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das on behalf of the HDFC Bank Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (160.6 KiB, 3,157 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 04.01.2017 on the Appeal filed by Mr. Ankur Jindal, Delhi, vs. CPIO, West Central Railway, Kota, Rajasthan (61.9 KiB, 10,250 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Nanik Premchand Rajwani, Distt. Thane Vs CPIO, Union Bank of India, Mumbai (Division Bench Decision) (335.8 KiB, 11,107 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Ex Nb Sub U.S. Maurya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Records Signals (92.3 KiB, 10,679 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Onkar Nath, Allahabad Vs. CPIO, Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata (86.3 KiB, 11,360 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Nirmal Kanta Vs. Laxmi Bai College, Delhi University (300.9 KiB, 8,134 hits)

      Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,221 hits)

      Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) (108.3 KiB, 866 hits)

      Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 1,016 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 1,197 hits)

    — Section 8(1)(b)

      Decision dated 15.05.2012 - Shri Vijay Gupta Vs. Delhi Police (216.0 KiB, 1,260 hits)

      Decision dated 19.01.2012 - Mr. A.L. Makhijani, President, Forum for Good Governance, Delhi Vs. CMO, CGHS, New Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi (47.3 KiB, 1,013 hits)

    — Section 8(1)(c)

      Decision dated 20.02.2013 - Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (123.9 KiB, 1,092 hits)

    — Section 8(1)(d) – Commercial Confidence, Trade Secrets or Intellectual Property

      CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (1.0 MiB, 1,208 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab (630.8 KiB, 1,190 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Savio J.F. Correia Vs. CPIO, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa (196.5 KiB, 2,200 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.10.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Love Gogia Vs. CPIO, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Office of CGM, Pune (222.5 KiB, 2,362 hits)

    Delhi High Court: “On the basis of the above judgments, the following principles can be clearly gleaned:
    i) CPIO/PIOs cannot withhold information without reasonable cause;
    xxx       xxx
    v) PIO/CPIO cannot function merely as “post offices” but instead are responsible to ensure that the information sought under the RTI Act is provided
    xxx      xxx
    viii) Information cannot be refused without reasonable cause.”
    [Section 5(3), 5(4), 5(5), 8(1)(d); PIO/CPIO]

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 22.01.2021 - Sh. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Erstwhile CPIO) Union Bank of India & Ors. Vs. Central Information Commission & Anr. (889.7 KiB, 4,156 hits)

    –—–

      CIC Decision dated 26.08.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Meeta Agrawal Vs. CPIO, DGM(G) & Nodal PIO, North Central Railway, RTI Cell, Subedarganj, Allahabad (787.5 KiB, 3,370 hits)

      CIC Order dated 03.06.2020 on the Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das on behalf of the HDFC Bank Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (160.6 KiB, 3,157 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Amit Khera v. CPIO, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Delhi (253.6 KiB, 3,972 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 4,038 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.09.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Vipin Jain v. CPIO, UCO Bank, Indore (150.0 KiB, 4,701 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.05.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Ms. Nutan Thankur vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (729.1 KiB, 5,465 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2019 on the Appeal filed by D. Sounderraj v. CPIO, Air India, Air Transport Services Ltd., Mumbai (174.4 KiB, 5,830 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Razaak K. Haider v. CPIO Election Commission of India, New Delhi (666.2 KiB, 6,086 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,674 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Balkrishna Porwal Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (192.5 KiB, 7,219 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Vivek Duggal Vs. CPIO, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board, N. Delhi (Div. Bench Decision) (307.1 KiB, 11,120 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Nanik Premchand Rajwani, Distt. Thane Vs CPIO, Union Bank of India, Mumbai (Division Bench Decision) (335.8 KiB, 11,107 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Onkar Nath, Allahabad Vs. CPIO, Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata (86.3 KiB, 11,360 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,788 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.11.2015 on Appeal from Dr. D. Dhaya Devadas & Shri V. Sundaram Vs. CPIO, Indian Bureau of Mines, Chennai (Full Bench Decision) (648.9 KiB, 9,969 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.09.2015 on Appeal from Indian Technomac Company Ltd., New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Bank of India, Janpath, New Delhi (402.8 KiB, 9,863 hits)

      Decision dated 11.02.2014 - Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 972 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Shri Girish Nautiyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (200.5 KiB, 1,285 hits)

      Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 1,165 hits)

      Decision dated 15.03.2013 - Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 1,062 hits)

      Decision dated 09.10.2012 - Shri Shankar Chandra Das Gupta, Kolkata Vs. IRDA, Hyderabad (443.5 KiB, 1,002 hits)

      Decision dated 01.06.2012 - Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 1,114 hits)

      Decision dated 21.02.2012 - Shri Arup K. Ghosh Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (237.6 KiB, 977 hits)

      Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 1,272 hits)

      Decision dated 09.11.2011 - Mr. K.R. Basu, Tirunelveli-7 Vs. PIO & CGM, Indian Bank, Chennai (52.7 KiB, 1,065 hits)

      Decision dated 19.09.2011 - Mr. H.G. Prabhu, Karkala Vs. PIO&DGM, Corporation Bank, Mangalore (39.8 KiB, 914 hits)

    — Section 8(1)(e) – Fiduciary Relationship

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab (630.8 KiB, 1,190 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.04.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Satwant Singh Yadav vs. PIO, PMA Cell, Director Police-I, Ministry of Home Affairs (877.7 KiB, 1,588 hits)

      Gujarat HC Judgment dated 31.03.2023 - Gujarat University vs. M Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) & 3 other(s) (796.5 KiB, 1,900 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Sura Prasad Pati Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India), Bhubaneswar (143.2 KiB, 1,973 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.12.2020 on the Second Appeal by Vihar Durve Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Mumbai (140.3 KiB, 3,675 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.03.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Ashok Rameshbhai Mistry v. CPIO, Dena Bank, Surat (130.2 KiB, 6,107 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms Seema Jain v. PIO, Department of Posts (99.1 KiB, 3,726 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,674 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ashok Pandit Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Maheshkhunt, Khagaria, Bihar (62.4 KiB, 8,446 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 12.02.2018 - Paras Nath Singh Vs. Union of India (266.0 KiB, 10,897 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 29.12.2016 on the Appeal filed by Shri Pradeep B. Sharma, Indore vs. State Bank of India, Jabalpur/Bhopal (36.9 KiB, 10,739 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Tolendra Kumar Baghmar, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO, Dena Bank, Raipur (211.0 KiB, 10,769 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Sham Sundar, Faridkot, Punjab Vs. CPIOs at Mumbai and Chandigarh, NABARD (219.2 KiB, 10,412 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Arun Kumar Agarwal, Bangalore Vs. Security & Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (171.2 KiB, 9,052 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 26.05.2016 on Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Gurmeet Singh, Delhi Vs. Safdarjang Hospital & VMMC, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 11,095 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.12.2015 on Appeal from Dr. A.L. Agarwal Vs. Delhi University (280.1 KiB, 12,085 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.10.2015 on Appeal from Shri Durga Prasad Kushwaha, Katni Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jabalpur (84.4 KiB, 10,142 hits)

      DoPT O.M. dated 22.09.2015 - Draft Extended Select List of 2003 in the UDC Grade-Status regarding passing of typing test(Reminder-VI) (36.5 KiB, 655 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.08.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sunhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. PIO, Min. of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi (259.0 KiB, 10,388 hits)

      Decision dated 17.12.2014 - Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 14,863 hits)

      Decision dated 05.11.2014 - Sardar Ranjit Singh, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (309.5 KiB, 778 hits)

      Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 863 hits)

      Decision dated 15.05.2014 - Shri K.P. Singh Vs. U.P.S.C., New Delhi (199.4 KiB, 847 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 1,266 hits)

      Decision dated 16.01.2014 - Ms. Surekha K.J., Kolkata Vs. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (240.6 KiB, 906 hits)

      Decision dated 03.12.2013 - Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 1,088 hits)

      Decision dated 13.11.2013 - Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 903 hits)

      Decision dated 04.09.2013 - Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 1,174 hits)

      Decision dated 06.07.2012 - Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 1,725 hits)

      Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 1,018 hits)

      Decision dated 28.05.2012 - Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 1,055 hits)

      Decision dated 23.12.2011 - Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Amritsar Vs. PIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Amritsar (57.3 KiB, 1,009 hits)

      Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 1,056 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 1,185 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 1,197 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 1,213 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 1,131 hits)

      Decision dated 29.09.2011 - Mr. G. Ramesh Reddy, Kurnool, AP Vs. CPIO, CGM, NABARD, Hyderabad (47.3 KiB, 922 hits)

      Decision dated 30.09..2011 - Shri Vikas Patel, Gandhidham Vs. Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust (rep. through Shri K.L. Sache, Dy. Estate Manager, Mumbai Port Trust) (342.3 KiB, 883 hits)

    — Section 8(1)(f)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms Seema Jain v. PIO, Department of Posts (99.1 KiB, 3,726 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Arun Kumar Agarwal, Bangalore Vs. Security & Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (171.2 KiB, 9,052 hits)

    — Section 8 (1)(g)

      CIC Decision dated 12.06.2019 on the second Appeal filed by Ujwala Kokde V. CPOI, Ministry of Home Affairs, Judicial Division, New Delhi (718.8 KiB, 5,198 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2019 on the Appeal filed by Mr. Kantilal B. Chavda v. CPIO, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat (225.6 KiB, 7,165 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Balkrishna Porwal Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (192.5 KiB, 7,219 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.12.2015 on Appeal from Dr. A.L. Agarwal Vs. Delhi University (280.1 KiB, 12,085 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.10.2015 on Appeal from Shri Durga Prasad Kushwaha, Katni Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jabalpur (84.4 KiB, 10,142 hits)

      Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 886 hits)

      Decision dated 12.03.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 1,030 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 1,266 hits)

      Decision dated 09.01.2014 - Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 941 hits)

      Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 1,165 hits)

      Decision dated 11.07.2013 - Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 1,035 hits)

      Decision dated 14.06.2013 - Shri V.N. Mathur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District (213.0 KiB, 919 hits)

      Decision dated 26.04.2013 - Shri Jagjit Singh, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 934 hits)

      Decision dated 21.03.2013 - Shri R. Govindarajan, Tirrupur Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.2 KiB, 986 hits)

      Decision dated 21.03.2013 - Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 997 hits)

      Decision dated 14.09.2012 - Shri Mohinder Singh Sidhu Vs. Dte. Gen. of Vigilance, Customs & Excise, New Delhi (195.6 KiB, 987 hits)

      Decision dated 06.07.2012 - Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 1,725 hits)

      Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 1,018 hits)

      Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Shri D.P. Ojha, DGP (Retd.), Patna Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (207.6 KiB, 1,020 hits)

      Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 1,018 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 1,207 hits)

    — Section 8 (1)(h) – Information impeding the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders

      CIC Order dated 28.12.2023 on the second appeal filed by Harmohan Kumar Arora Vs. CPIO, UCO Bank, Kolkata (145.4 KiB, 526 hits)

    — Cogent reasons to be given by Public Authority

      CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ram Meena vs. PIO, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, I.P. Estate, New Delhi (324.5 KiB, 793 hits)

    Delhi High Court: It was held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court that “the legal position as settled by this court is that cogent reasons have to be given by the public authority as to how and why the investigation or prosecution will get impaired or hampered by giving the information in question.” [Exemption under Sec. 8(1)(h)]

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 05.02.2021 - Amit Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi (489.9 KiB, 3,378 hits)

    ——

      CIC Decision dated 06.08.2018 on the Appeal filed by Mr. K.S. Jain Vs. CPIO, Dte. Gen. of Vig., Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi (175.6 KiB, 7,211 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 886 hits)

      Decision dated 11.12.2014 - Shri Satinder Nath Sood Vs. CPIO, United Bank of India Regional Office, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 799 hits)

      Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 863 hits)

      Decision dated 05.06.2014 - Mr. S.P. Dogra, Ambala Cantt. Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Deptt. of Posts, Ambala (67.5 KiB, 820 hits)

      Decision dated 21.05.2014 - Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara (63.0 KiB, 8,372 hits)

      Decision dated 12.05.2014 - Mr. Patel Hasmukhbai Maganbhai, Godhdra Vs. Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhra (64.5 KiB, 754 hits)

      Decision dated 12.03.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 1,030 hits)

      Decision dated 10.03.2014 - Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 1,090 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 1,266 hits)

      Decision dated 09.01.2014 - Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 941 hits)

      Decision dated 15.11.2013 - Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 1,053 hits)

      Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 1,165 hits)

      Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 999 hits)

      Decision dated 07.05.2013 - Shri P.S. Jadon, Lok Vihar Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 929 hits)

      Decision dated 12.04.2013 - Shri Rednam Deepak Vs. Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 909 hits)

      Decision dated 14.09.2012 - Shri Mohinder Singh Sidhu Vs. Dte. Gen. of Vigilance, Customs & Excise, New Delhi (195.6 KiB, 987 hits)

      Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri K. Thankshinamurthy, Madurai Vs. CPIO, CBI, Chennai (206.7 KiB, 1,076 hits)

      Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri Jagdish Prasad, Ranchi Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (204.8 KiB, 973 hits)

      Decision dated 06.07.2012 - Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 1,725 hits)

      Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 1,298 hits)

    — Section 8 (1)(i) – Cabinet Note, etc.

      CIC Decision dated 24.04.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Satwant Singh Yadav vs. PIO, PMA Cell, Director Police-I, Ministry of Home Affairs (877.7 KiB, 1,588 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.03.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Department of Social Justice & Empowerment, New Delhi (138.3 KiB, 2,806 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.07.2019 on the Second Appeal file by Commodore Lokesh K. Batra V. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (146.3 KiB, 5,155 hits)

      Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi (474.1 KiB, 14,708 hits)

    — Section 8 (1)(j) – Personal information having no relationship to any public activity or interest or involving invasion on privacy of individual

      CIC Order dated 16.01.2024 on the second appeal filed by Shri Govind Prasad Goel Vs. Manager, RTI, FCI, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh (310.1 KiB, 564 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Yash Malhotra vs. CPIO, Income Tax Department, Vikas Bhawan, IP Estate, New Delhi (355.0 KiB, 803 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (1.0 MiB, 1,208 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.07.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi vs. O/o of Pr. Chief Commissioner of (IT), CCA), Kanpur and O/o of Addl./Jt. CIT, Central Range, Meerut (208.6 KiB, 1,151 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab (630.8 KiB, 1,190 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.04.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Satwant Singh Yadav vs. PIO, PMA Cell, Director Police-I, Ministry of Home Affairs (877.7 KiB, 1,588 hits)

      Gujarat HC Judgment dated 31.03.2023 - Gujarat University vs. M Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) & 3 other(s) (796.5 KiB, 1,900 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Sura Prasad Pati Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India), Bhubaneswar (143.2 KiB, 1,973 hits)

      CIC Order dated 16.09.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Gautam Saren Vs. CPIO, National Test House, Kolkata (1.4 MiB, 2,915 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 04.08.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Prakash Gopalan Vs. Public Information Officer, Office of CPMG, Kerala Circle, Deptt. of Posts, Thiruvananthapuram (507.4 KiB, 2,793 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Savio J.F. Correia Vs. CPIO, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa (196.5 KiB, 2,200 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.02.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Jitendra Kumar vs. CPIO, O/o Income Tax Officer, Aligarh, UP (151.8 KiB, 3,039 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.12.2020 on the Second Appeal by Vihar Durve Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Mumbai (140.3 KiB, 3,675 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.11.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Rahmat Bano Vs. Office of Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan (157.9 KiB, 3,204 hits)

    ——-

      CIC Decision dated 23.02.2022 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Sh. Nagsen Rajaram Suralkar Vs. Department of Posts, Office of Supdt. of Post Office, Bhuswal, Maharashtra (179.9 KiB, 2,354 hits)

    Delhi HC Judgment dated 31.08.2020 – Dr. R.S. Gupta Vs. Govt. of NCTD & Ors. – Delhi High Court: In absence of even a remote connection with any larger public interest, disclosure of information would be exempted as the same would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual under section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act. [Sections 7, 8(1)(j); Attendance Record]

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 31.08.2020 - Dr. R.S. Gupta Vs. Govt. of NCTD & Ors. (151.7 KiB, 3,743 hits)

    ——-

      CIC Decision dated 26.08.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Meeta Agrawal Vs. CPIO, DGM(G) & Nodal PIO, North Central Railway, RTI Cell, Subedarganj, Allahabad (787.5 KiB, 3,370 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.07.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Basavantamma Vs. CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Bengaluru (818.8 KiB, 3,241 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Shri Baljeet Singh Vs. CPIO, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh (Haryana) (815.2 KiB, 3,438 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Rana Ranjan v. CPIO, National Insurance Company Ltd., Bhavnagar, Gujarat (221.4 KiB, 3,711 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 20.12.2019 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Kripalani M. v. CPIO, Office of Pr. Commissioner of Customs, Menezies Aviation Cargo Terminal, Bangaluru (Full Bench Decision) (257.7 KiB, 3,649 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 29.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui v. CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (456.2 KiB, 3,636 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 07.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Rakesh Sharma Vs. Asstt. Secretary & CPIO, Central Board of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Allahabad (520.3 KiB, 4,323 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.09.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Vipin Jain v. CPIO, UCO Bank, Indore (150.0 KiB, 4,701 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2019 on the Appeal filed by D. Sounderraj v. CPIO, Air India, Air Transport Services Ltd., Mumbai (174.4 KiB, 5,830 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 26.03.2019 on the Appeal filed by Nutan Thakur v. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (164.3 KiB, 6,166 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri R.P. Rohilla v. PIO, Dte. General of Health Services, New Delhi (125.4 KiB, 6,431 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms Seema Jain v. PIO, Department of Posts (99.1 KiB, 3,726 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,674 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.08.2018 on the Appeal filed by Mr. K.S. Jain Vs. CPIO, Dte. Gen. of Vig., Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi (175.6 KiB, 7,211 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri S.P. Sinha Vs APIO, Min. of Shipping, MMD, Mumbai (60.6 KiB, 6,936 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ashok Pandit Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Maheshkhunt, Khagaria, Bihar (62.4 KiB, 8,446 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.02.2018 on Appeal filed by Soni S. Eramath Vs. CPIO, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi (57.2 KiB, 8,620 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on Appeal filed by Madhu Vs. PIO & Sr. DMM, DRM Office, Northern Railway, New Delhi (484.7 KiB, 9,783 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 10,016 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 04.01.2017 on the Appeal filed by Shri Devraj, Distt. Dharwad, Karnataka vs. CPIO, South Western Railway, Bangalore (51.4 KiB, 10,972 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 29.12.2016 on the Appeal filed by Shri Pradeep B. Sharma, Indore vs. State Bank of India, Jabalpur/Bhopal (36.9 KiB, 10,739 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 17.11.2016 on Appeal filed by Mrs. Gayatri Devi, Distt. Patna, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Office of GM, Personnel Branch, Vaishali, Bihar (53.5 KiB, 10,854 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 31.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Joginder Singh, Tihar, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendera Place, New Delhi (169.9 KiB, 10,872 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Bhramanand Mishra Vs. PIO, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Lucknow (517.0 KiB, 12,113 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Ex Nb Sub U.S. Maurya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Records Signals (92.3 KiB, 10,679 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury, Lucknow Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank, New Delhi (211.9 KiB, 8,820 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Arun Kumar Agarwal, Bangalore Vs. Security & Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (171.2 KiB, 9,052 hits)

      सीआईसी निर्णय दिनाकित 23.03.2016 - श्री अशोक कुमार, नन्द नगरी, दिल्ली Vs सी जी एच एस, लक्ष्मी नगर, दिल्ली (156.5 KiB, 11,699 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Nirmal Kanta Vs. Laxmi Bai College, Delhi University (300.9 KiB, 8,134 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 07.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri P. Muruesan, Turicorin Vs. Tuticorin Port Trust (58.4 KiB, 5,730 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.12.2015 on Appeal from Dr. A.L. Agarwal Vs. Delhi University (280.1 KiB, 12,085 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.10.2015 on Appeal from Shri Durga Prasad Kushwaha, Katni Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jabalpur (84.4 KiB, 10,142 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.08.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sunhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. PIO, Min. of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi (259.0 KiB, 10,388 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.08.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Chandratan, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Office of Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Surat (89.1 KiB, 10,722 hits)

    download id=”6797″]

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla (44.9 KiB, 13,153 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 14,603 hits)

      Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 15,033 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi (54.2 KiB, 14,662 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 11,538 hits)

      Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 1,018 hits)

      Decision dated 17.12.2014 - Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 14,863 hits)

      Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 1,103 hits)

      Decision dated 05.05.2014 - Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 1,355 hits)

      Decision dated 15.05.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 964 hits)

      Decision dated 24.04.2014 - Shri Rakesh Gupta Vs. Kendriya Bhandar (216.9 KiB, 936 hits)

      Decision dated 03.04.2014 - Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 1,140 hits)

      Decision dated 12.03.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 1,030 hits)

      Decision dated 11.02.2014 - Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 972 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Shri Girish Nautiyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (200.5 KiB, 1,285 hits)

      Decision dated 03.12.2013 - Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 1,088 hits)

      Decision dated 13.11.2013 - Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 903 hits)

      Decision dated 13.11.2013 - Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 960 hits)

      Decision dated 07.11.2013 - Smt. Tapati Bhattacharjee Vs. Office of Dy. Conservator of Forests, Port Blair (95.2 KiB, 805 hits)

      Decision dated 08.10.2013 - Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (95.7 KiB, 924 hits)

      Decision dated 17.09.2013 - Shri Amanullah Khan, Pune Vs. Tax Recovery Officer & AO, Pune (240.1 KiB, 1,706 hits)

      Decision dated 12.08.2013 - Shri M.Yogeshwar Raj Vs. Air India (211.1 KiB, 881 hits)

      Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 1,165 hits)

      Decision dated 22.07.2013 - Shri Vishwas Bharmburkar, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi (208.8 KiB, 962 hits)

      Decision dated 11.07.2013 - Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 1,035 hits)

      Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 1,038 hits)

      Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 999 hits)

      Decision dated 13.06.2013 - Shri Kamal Sharma, Agra Vs. ACIT, Kanpur (64.6 KiB, 938 hits)

      Decision dated 21.03.2013 - Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 997 hits)

      Decision dated 15.03.2013 - Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 1,062 hits)

    Delhi High Court Judgment dated 6.11.2012 

      Decision dated 01.06.2012 - Mr. S. Kandasamy, Manager, Pallavan Grama Bank, Irudhukottai, Tamilnadu Vs. PIO & GM, Pallavan Grama Bank, Salem, Tamilnadu (62.5 KiB, 946 hits)

      Decision dated 28.05.2012 - Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 1,055 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2012 - Mrs. Anita Singh, Galjwadi, Gadi Cant., Dehradun Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Bareilly (UP) (76.9 KiB, 1,088 hits)

      Decision dated 04.04.2012 - Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 1,295 hits)

      Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 1,272 hits)

      Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Mr. Sukhjit Singh Walia, Patiala Vs. PIO & Dir. (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (47.5 KiB, 996 hits)

      Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 1,056 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 1,100 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 1,131 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 1,265 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Sh. D.K. Pandey, Jamshedpur Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Ranchi (62.6 KiB, 1,043 hits)

    — Section 8(2) – Public interest in disclosure outweighing harm to the protected interests

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms Seema Jain v. PIO, Department of Posts (99.1 KiB, 3,726 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,674 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Hemant Dhage Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (656.2 KiB, 11,869 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.08.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sunhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. PIO, Min. of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi (259.0 KiB, 10,388 hits)

      Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 1,103 hits)

      Decision dated 08.10.2013 - Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (95.7 KiB, 924 hits)

      Decision dated 01.06.2012 - Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 1,114 hits)

      Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 1,272 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 1,197 hits)

    — Section 8(3)

      CIC Decision dated 29.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui v. CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (456.2 KiB, 3,636 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Hemant Kumar Agarwal, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Office, Raigad (55.0 KiB, 11,483 hits)

    — Section 8 (Uncategorized)

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 16.01.2019 - Ehtisham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO Intelligence Bureau (370.6 KiB, 6,959 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 07.05.2018 on the Appeal/Complaint filed by Mr. M. Dinesh Vs. PIO, Bureau of Immigration,IB (MHA) (362.6 KiB, 6,932 hits)

      Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 14,631 hits)

      Decision dated 09.03.2012 - Shri Ankur Mutreja, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Census Operations, New Delhi (213.3 KiB, 830 hits)

      Decision dated 21.02.2012 - Dr. Gyan Prakash Mishra, Distt. Balia, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court, UP (303.3 KiB, 968 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mr. Deepak Bhalla, Paharganj, New Delhi Vs. PIO, Embassy of India, The Netherlands and DS (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (187.1 KiB, 867 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mr. A.M. Attar, Mumbai Vs. PIO & GZM, Bank of India, Mumbai (181.1 KiB, 932 hits)

      Decision dated 01.09.2011 - Smt. Neena, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 903 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mrs. Mary V. Abraham, Engg. College, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. PIO & Director, ISRO, Bangalore (62.7 KiB, 800 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Mohit Paul, New Delhi Vs. PIO&DGM, Bank of India, Mumbai (59.3 KiB, 1,268 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 1,253 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 929 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Shri R.K. Jain Vs. CBEC, New Delhi (352.9 KiB, 960 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Shri Rameshwar Lal Bagotia Vs. Rajasthan Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ( A GOI Enterprise), Jaipur (358.1 KiB, 1,314 hits)

      Decision dated 11.07.2011 - Mr. Mahinder Singh, AD, ESIC, New Delhi Vs. PIO, ESIC, Indore (57.9 KiB, 875 hits)

    Section 9 – Grounds for rejection to access in certain cases

      Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 1,272 hits)

    Section 10 – Severability
    — Section 10

      CIC Decision dated 06.07.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi vs. O/o of Pr. Chief Commissioner of (IT), CCA), Kanpur and O/o of Addl./Jt. CIT, Central Range, Meerut (208.6 KiB, 1,151 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.04.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Satwant Singh Yadav vs. PIO, PMA Cell, Director Police-I, Ministry of Home Affairs (877.7 KiB, 1,588 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury, Lucknow Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank, New Delhi (211.9 KiB, 8,820 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Onkar Nath, Allahabad Vs. CPIO, Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata (86.3 KiB, 11,360 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,566 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 13,234 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 14,603 hits)

      Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 14,767 hits)

      Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 14,740 hits)

    Section 10(1)

      CIC Decision dated 07.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Rakesh Sharma Vs. Asstt. Secretary & CPIO, Central Board of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Allahabad (520.3 KiB, 4,323 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on the Appeal filed by Shri Ajay Kumar, Gurgaon Vs. National Institute of Technology, Patna (32.3 KiB, 9,439 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 1,266 hits)

      Decision dated 15.03.2013 - Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 1,062 hits)

      Decision dated 21.08.2012 - Shri B.D. Gupta Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (239.6 KiB, 814 hits)

      Decision dated 06.07.2012 - Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 1,725 hits)

      Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 1,018 hits)

    — Section 10(2)

      Decision dated 09.01.2014 - Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 941 hits)

      Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,221 hits)

      Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 1,018 hits)

      Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 1,016 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mrs. Mary V. Abraham, Engg. College, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. PIO & Director, ISRO, Bangalore (62.7 KiB, 800 hits)

      Decision dated 06.07.2011 - Mr. Binoy Gupta, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Revenue & CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (57.0 KiB, 879 hits)

    Section 11 – Third Party Information

      CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (1.0 MiB, 1,208 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri R.P. Rohilla v. PIO, Dte. General of Health Services, New Delhi (125.4 KiB, 6,431 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri S.P. Sinha Vs APIO, Min. of Shipping, MMD, Mumbai (60.6 KiB, 6,936 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 12.02.2018 - Paras Nath Singh Vs. Union of India (266.0 KiB, 10,897 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on Appeal filed by Madhu Vs. PIO & Sr. DMM, DRM Office, Northern Railway, New Delhi (484.7 KiB, 9,783 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Tolendra Kumar Baghmar, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO, Dena Bank, Raipur (211.0 KiB, 10,769 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Vivek Duggal Vs. CPIO, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board, N. Delhi (Div. Bench Decision) (307.1 KiB, 11,120 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 26.05.2016 on Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Gurmeet Singh, Delhi Vs. Safdarjang Hospital & VMMC, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 11,095 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,566 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi (352.4 KiB, 14,917 hits)

      Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 15,033 hits)

      Decision dated 05.05.2014 - Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 1,355 hits)

      Decision dated 15.05.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 964 hits)

      Decision dated 02.05.2014 - Shri Gaikwad Shahurao Vishwanthrao, Parbhani, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Nanded, Maharashtra (210.2 KiB, 898 hits)

      Decision dated 11.02.2014 - Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 972 hits)

      Decision dated 07.01.2014 - Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi (322.2 KiB, 9,219 hits)

      Decision dated 04.09.2013 - Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 1,174 hits)

      Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 1,038 hits)

      Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 999 hits)

      Decision dated 14.06.2013 - Shri V.N. Mathur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District (213.0 KiB, 919 hits)

      Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Shri Sanjay Badekar, Mumbai Vs. LIC of India, Mumbai (91.3 KiB, 837 hits)

      Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (52.3 KiB, 781 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2012 - Mrs. Anita Singh, Galjwadi, Gadi Cant., Dehradun Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Bareilly (UP) (76.9 KiB, 1,088 hits)

      Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri S.P. Goyal Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (195.4 KiB, 1,082 hits)

    Section 11(1)

      CIC Order dated 03.06.2020 on the Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das on behalf of the HDFC Bank Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (160.6 KiB, 3,157 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 4,038 hits)

    Section 18 – Powers and Functions of Information Commissions

      CIC Decision dated 06.05.2016 on Complaint filed by Shri S.C. Agrawal Vs. Constitution Club of India (Full Bench Decision) (252.0 KiB, 10,816 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,788 hits)

      Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) (350.5 KiB, 14,644 hits)

      Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (253.0 KiB, 14,658 hits)

      Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 802 hits)

      Decision dated 05.07.2013 - Shri Jayant Rakshit, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata (207.3 KiB, 850 hits)

      Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Mr. M. Vellaipandi, STQC IT Centre, Chennai Vs. CPOI & Director, STQC Dte. under Min. of Comm. & IT, New Delhi (53.8 KiB, 923 hits)

      Decision dated 28.09.2012 - Shri Shiv Shankar Tiwari, Faridabad Vs. DOPT, New Delhi (331.0 KiB, 867 hits)

      Decision dated 14.08.2012 - Shri Syed Idramudin, Nizamabad Vs. Appellate Authority, Regional Passport Office, Secunderabad (331.0 KiB, 927 hits)

      Decision dated 30.04.2012 - Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 1,055 hits)

      Decision dated 06.03.2012 - Shri N. Srinivas, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, Chennai (298.2 KiB, 885 hits)

      Decision dated 12.01.2012 - Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 1,008 hits)

      Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 934 hits)

      Decision dated 30.11.2011 - Shri Murlidhar, Patna Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (286.2 KiB, 925 hits)

      Decision dated 28.11.2011 - Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 932 hits)

    Direction to treat the appeal before the Commission as the First Appeal

      Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Dr. K. Padma Priya, Asstt. Professor, JNTU College of Engg., Pulivendula, A.P. Vs. FAA, AICTE, New Delhi (104.6 KiB, 910 hits)

      Decision dated 26.07.2013 - Shri Ramakrishna, Bangalore Vs. First Appellate Authority, CBSE Regional Office, Chennai (106.3 KiB, 700 hits)

      Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 934 hits)

      Decision dated 09.11.2011 - Mr. Adishwar Jain Vs. Office of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (223.8 KiB, 788 hits)

    Section 18

      CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (1.0 MiB, 1,208 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 17.05.2021 on the Complaint filed by Shri Aniket Gaurav Vs. PIO, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (15.8 MiB, 2,595 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.11.2020 on the Complaint filed by Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Mumbai (150.7 KiB, 3,186 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 10.10.2019 - Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Vs. Krishan Kumar (463.3 KiB, 4,591 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 17.05.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Gopal Kumar Jha vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Patna (3.2 MiB, 5,642 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.11.2017 on the Complaints filed by Shri R.K. Jain and Ms. Ita Bose against Indian Banks Association, Mumbai (1.1 MiB, 9,930 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 10,016 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi (352.1 KiB, 12,404 hits)

      Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 12,993 hits)

      Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 802 hits)

      Decision dated 01.12.2014 - Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 14,546 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 14,527 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 1,003 hits)

      Decision dated 24.12.2013 - First Appellate Authority (RTI), PAO (Ors), BEG, Roorkee, Uttarakhand (103.9 KiB, 5,683 hits)

    — Section 18(1)(b) 

      CIC Decision dated 20.11.2017 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Shailesh Gandhi Vs. The CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office Building, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (697.7 KiB, 9,717 hits)

     — Section 18(1)(e) 

      CIC Decision dated 05.11.2020 on the Complaint filed by Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Mumbai (150.7 KiB, 3,186 hits)

    Section 19 – Appeal

    — Section 19

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,515 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 10.10.2019 - Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Vs. Krishan Kumar (463.3 KiB, 4,591 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Min. of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi (483.5 KiB, 6,785 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.03.2017 on the Appeal filed by Insad, New Delhi, Vs. Dy. P.O., Min. of External Affairs, R.K. Puram, New Delhi (62.8 KiB, 10,107 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Tolendra Kumar Baghmar, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO, Dena Bank, Raipur (211.0 KiB, 10,769 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Nanik Premchand Rajwani, Distt. Thane Vs CPIO, Union Bank of India, Mumbai (Division Bench Decision) (335.8 KiB, 11,107 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Ms. Monika Singh Vs. Family Welfare Deptt., Govt. of NCT of Delhi (291.4 KiB, 11,052 hits)

      DoPT O.M. dated 22.09.2015 - Draft Extended Select List of 2003 in the UDC Grade-Status regarding passing of typing test(Reminder-VI) (36.5 KiB, 655 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

    — Section 19(1) – Appeal to First Appellate Authority (FAA)

      Decision dated 24.07.2013 - Shri Ashish Ranjan, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (210.9 KiB, 930 hits)

      Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 934 hits)

      Decision dated 28.11.2011 - Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 932 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mrs. Ambika Sudhakaran, Palakkad, Kerala Vs. PIO, Bank of India, New Delhi (35.5 KiB, 825 hits)

      Decision dated 28.09.2011 - Mr. Nitesh Kumar Tripathi, Saifai Etawah, UP Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (34.6 KiB, 704 hits)

    — Section 19(2) 

      CIC Decision dated 03.06.2015 on Appeal filed by Rakhee Marwah Vs. PIO, SDM (Saket), New Delhi (256.3 KiB, 13,539 hits)

     — Section 19(3) – Submission of Second Appeal within 90 days 

      CIC Decision dated 06.11.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Rahmat Bano Vs. Office of Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan (157.9 KiB, 3,204 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.07.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Basavantamma Vs. CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Bengaluru (818.8 KiB, 3,241 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.04.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Kairun BiBi Vs. CPIO, Steel Authority of India, Dhanbad (530.5 KiB, 3,280 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.02.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Ajay Kumar v. CPIO, Northern Central Railway, Agra (122.5 KiB, 3,545 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 16.01.2019 - Ehtisham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO Intelligence Bureau (370.6 KiB, 6,959 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgement dated 12.02.2018 - Paras Nath Singh Vs. Union of India (266.0 KiB, 10,897 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 10,016 hits)

      Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 15,033 hits)

      Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 886 hits)

      Decision dated 11.12.2014 - Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 859 hits)

      Decision dated 26.11.2014 - Shri Rohit Sabharwal Vs. Delhi Fire Service, GNCTD, Delhi (334.1 KiB, 976 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Shri V.K. Jha Vs. Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (317.5 KiB, 1,046 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 14,527 hits)

      Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 1,003 hits)

      Decision dated 22.10.2014 - Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 939 hits)

      Decision dated 10.10.2014 - Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board (208.1 KiB, 14,500 hits)

      Decision dated 20.08.2014 - Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 14,753 hits)

      Decision dated 17.04.2014 - Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 872 hits)

      Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Mr. M. Vellaipandi, STQC IT Centre, Chennai Vs. CPOI & Director, STQC Dte. under Min. of Comm. & IT, New Delhi (53.8 KiB, 923 hits)

      Decision dated 30.04.2012 - Mr. Hassan Singh Mejie, Chandigarh Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (52.4 KiB, 846 hits)

      Decision dated 07.03.2012 - Shri Kamaldev Thakur, East Champaran, Bihar Vs. Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Motihari, Bihar (297.8 KiB, 807 hits)

      Decision dated 28.11.2011 - Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 932 hits)

    — Section 19(5) – CPIO to justify denial of information

      CIC Decision dated 25.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Savio J.F. Correia Vs. CPIO, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa (196.5 KiB, 2,200 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.10.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Love Gogia Vs. CPIO, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Office of CGM, Pune (222.5 KiB, 2,362 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 1,100 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 1,029 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 1,101 hits)

    — Section 19(6)

      CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 10,016 hits)

    — Section 19(8)

      CIC Decision dated 22.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi (884.2 KiB, 3,294 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Hemant Kumar Agarwal, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Office, Raigad (55.0 KiB, 11,483 hits)

    Section 19(8) (a) – Direction to Secure Compliance with the RTI Act

      CIC Decision dated 13.11.2017 on the Complaints filed by Shri R.K. Jain and Ms. Ita Bose against Indian Banks Association, Mumbai (1.1 MiB, 9,930 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.03.2017 on Second Appeal filed by Amrika Bai V. PIO, EPFO, Raipur (84.2 KiB, 10,251 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Hemant Dhage Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (656.2 KiB, 11,869 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,788 hits)

      Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 1,163 hits)

      Decision dated 17.10.2014 - Shri M.K. Gupta, Delhi Vs. PIO, Jt. Dir. (Gr.Cell), CGHS, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 837 hits)

      Decision dated 22.09.2011 - Mr. Ankur Goyal, JNU, New Delhi Vs. JS, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (76.8 KiB, 1,000 hits)

    Section 19(8) (b) – Compensation to the Information Seeker

      CIC Decision dated 17.05.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Gopal Kumar Jha vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Patna (3.2 MiB, 5,642 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 30.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Min. of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi (483.5 KiB, 6,785 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon (44.1 KiB, 13,030 hits)

      Decision dated 01.12.2014 - Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 14,546 hits)

      Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Bhanu Pratap, Moradabad Vs. US & CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 870 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 950 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Ajit Kumar, Patna Vs. Dy. Director, SSC, Allahabad (213.1 KiB, 873 hits)

      Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, Srinagar Vs. PIO & Program Executive, Prasar Bharti, Srinagar (48.2 KiB, 806 hits)

      Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Akshay Pant, Port Blair Vs. PIO, A&N Administration, Port Blair (60.6 KiB, 1,034 hits)

      Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Sh. D.K. Bindra, New Delhi Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 846 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 1,184 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 786 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Ms. Kiran Mehtra, Chandigarh Vs. PIO & Rergistrar-cum-Secretary, Central Council of Homeopathy, New Delhi (191.1 KiB, 743 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 910 hits)

    Section 20

      CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (1.0 MiB, 1,208 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.02.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Ajay Kumar v. CPIO, Northern Central Railway, Agra (122.5 KiB, 3,545 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Razaak K. Haider v. CPIO Election Commission of India, New Delhi (666.2 KiB, 6,086 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.12.2018 - Mr. R.S. Rai v. CPIO, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Jabalpur (173.2 KiB, 6,963 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.12.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sounder Rajan v. CPIO, IDBI Bank Limited, Mumbai (128.8 KiB, 6,833 hits)

    Section 20(1) and (2) – Penalties for not furnishing the information to the information seeker within the specified time 

      CIC Decision dated 25.10.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Subrata Goswami vs. PIO, Department of Posts, Yogayog Bhawan, C.R. Avenue, Kolkata-12 (289.8 KiB, 819 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.01.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Ms Renu Bala Kochhar Vs. Public Information Officers, DDA, New Delhi (375.5 KiB, 2,248 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Sura Prasad Pati Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India), Bhubaneswar (143.2 KiB, 1,973 hits)

      CIC Order dated 01.08.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Anil Kumr Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, Hapur (180.9 KiB, 2,792 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.07.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Basavantamma Vs. CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Bengaluru (818.8 KiB, 3,241 hits)

      CIC Order dated 03.06.2020 on the Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das on behalf of the HDFC Bank Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (160.6 KiB, 3,157 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.04.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Kairun BiBi Vs. CPIO, Steel Authority of India, Dhanbad (530.5 KiB, 3,280 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO & Dy. GM (Legal), Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., New Delhi (1.8 MiB, 3,375 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 17.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. D.T. Eshwaran Vs. CPIO, Central Govt. Employees Welfare Housing Organization, New Delhi (500.9 KiB, 3,285 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 05.12.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 4,038 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 17.05.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Gopal Kumar Jha vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Patna (3.2 MiB, 5,642 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Ms Pushpa Devi v. CPIO, Central Coalfield Limited, Jharkhand (590.4 KiB, 6,342 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.08.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms. Rashi Agrawal Vs. CPIO, SPMCIL, New Delhi, CPIO, Indian Security Press, Nashik (165.0 KiB, 6,816 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 25.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Balkrishna Porwal Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (192.5 KiB, 7,219 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.07.2017 on the Appeal filed by Ms. Krishna Sharma vs. PIO, Department of Posts, Supdt. of Post Offices, Gwalior (67.4 KiB, 9,816 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 10,016 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.03.2017 on the Appeal filed by Insad, New Delhi, Vs. Dy. P.O., Min. of External Affairs, R.K. Puram, New Delhi (62.8 KiB, 10,107 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.02.2017 on Appeal filed by Shri Gopal Rao Gudi Vs.PIO, National Council of Science Museum (58.4 KiB, 11,149 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 13.05.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gaurav Sethi Vs. University Grants Commission (256.5 KiB, 11,268 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 06.05.2016 on Complaint filed by Shri S.C. Agrawal Vs. Constitution Club of India (Full Bench Decision) (252.0 KiB, 10,816 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Rameshwar Das Bhankhar Vs. Kendrya Vidyalaya Sansthan, N. Delhi (293.6 KiB, 11,121 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Nirmal Kanta Vs. Laxmi Bai College, Delhi University (300.9 KiB, 8,134 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 23.02.2016 on Complaint/Appeal filed by Shri Dinesh Chandra Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 11,257 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 09.11.2015 on Appeal from Shri R.K. Jain Vs. Delhi University (250.2 KiB, 9,836 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.04.2015 on Appeal from Mohit Hasija Vs. PIO, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (253.7 KiB, 844 hits)

      Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 13,166 hits)

      Decision dated 15.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Gurmeet Singh, Kanpur Vs. CGHS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (122.8 KiB, 794 hits)

      Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 12,993 hits)

      Decision dated 16.04.2014 - Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 917 hits)

      Decision dated 29.01.2014 - Shri Bhagwan Chand Saxena Vs. Export Inspection Council of India (213.0 KiB, 943 hits)

      Decision dated 22.11.2013 - Shri Rambir Singh, New Delhi Vs. Office of Additional District Magisrate, GNCT, New Delhi (93.8 KiB, 778 hits)

      Decision dated 11.11.2013 - Dr. Rajiv Bhandari, Panchkula Vs. Office of the Director of Higher Education, UT, Chandigarh (93.4 KiB, 777 hits)

      Decision dated 14.10.2013 - Shri Rakesh Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. Transport Department (GNCT), Delhi (305.7 KiB, 6,561 hits)

      Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,221 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2013 - Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 1,126 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2013 - Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur (UP) Vs. US, Staff Selection Committee, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 1,012 hits)

      Decision dated 05.07.2013 - Shri Jayant Rakshit, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata (207.3 KiB, 850 hits)

      Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Shri Pradip Shankar Choughule Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (221.5 KiB, 932 hits)

      Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Bhanu Pratap, Moradabad Vs. US & CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 870 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur, UP Vs. CPIO, SSC, Allahabad (304.1 KiB, 870 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 950 hits)

      Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Ajit Kumar, Patna Vs. Dy. Director, SSC, Allahabad (213.1 KiB, 873 hits)

      Decision dated 15.02.2013 - Shri Ajay Pal, Bawal, Rewari, Haryana Vs. Under Secretary, SSC, New Delhi (303.8 KiB, 768 hits)

      Decision dated 08.10.2012 - Shri Madhav B. Karmakar Vs. Deptt. of Financial Services, New Delhi (87.7 KiB, 849 hits)

      Decision dated 14.08.2012 - Shri Syed Idramudin, Nizamabad Vs. Appellate Authority, Regional Passport Office, Secunderabad (331.0 KiB, 927 hits)

      Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 1,107 hits)

      Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Mr. Dinbandhu Sarkar, National Library, Kolkata Vs. National Library, Kolkata (76.6 KiB, 816 hits)

      Decision dated 06.03.2012 - Shri N. Srinivas, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, Chennai (298.2 KiB, 885 hits)

      Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri Gopal Singh, Distt. Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur (304.9 KiB, 930 hits)

      Decision dated 19.01.2012 - Mr. Tarun Nag, Kolkata Vs. PIO, Central Drugs Laboratory, Kolkata (56.4 KiB, 1,081 hits)

      Decision dated 23.12.2011 - Mr. R.C. Gupta, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. PIO & HOD, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi (48.3 KiB, 878 hits)

      Decision dated 30.11.2011 - Shri Murlidhar, Patna Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (286.2 KiB, 925 hits)

      Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 1,185 hits)

      Decision dated 31.10.2011 - Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 985 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 1,029 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 1,101 hits)

      Decision dated 19.09.2011 - Sh. Jitendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. Min. of Home Affairs, New Delhi (613.7 KiB, 863 hits)

      Decision dated 16.09.2011 - Shri S. Saravanan Vs. NHAI, New Delhi (182.8 KiB, 743 hits)

      Decision dated 16.09.2011 - Mr. Suresh Kumar Verma, Balrampur, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Kandaula Branch, UP (42.4 KiB, 787 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra,, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (197.2 KiB, 786 hits)

      Decision dated 06.09.2011 - Ms. Kiran Mehtra, Chandigarh Vs. PIO & Rergistrar-cum-Secretary, Central Council of Homeopathy, New Delhi (191.1 KiB, 743 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Kuldip Raj Kaila, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab) Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jalandhar (55.9 KiB, 910 hits)

      Decision dated 04.08.2011 - Mr. Anil Dutt Tyagi, West Sant Nagar (Burari), Delhi Vs. PIO, Deptt. of Urban Development, New Delhi (44.5 KiB, 929 hits)

      Decision dated 07.07.2011 - Mr. Krishnanand Tripathi, Sr. Correspondent, Live India, New Delhi Vs. Mr. Anil Palta, CPIO&DIG, CBI, New Delhi (142.5 KiB, 1,101 hits)

      Decision dated 04.07.2011 - Mr. S.S. Ranawat, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) Vs. CPIO & SSP (HQ), CBI, New Delhi (102.1 KiB, 858 hits)

      Order dated 25.06.2011 - Mr. Govind Lal Arora, Burari, Delhi Vs. PIO & SDM (Civil Lines) & PIO & ADM (North), Delhi (49.2 KiB, 852 hits)

    Section 22 – Act to have overriding effect

      Madras HC Judgment dated 16.10.2019 - The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, Chennai (234.3 KiB, 4,667 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,983 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 08.08.2017 on the Appeal file by Sh. RK Jain, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (358.6 KiB, 9,588 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 12.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Hemant Dhage Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (656.2 KiB, 11,869 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,788 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,148 hits)

      Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 1,266 hits)

      Decision dated 08.07.2013 - Shri Amarjit Sen, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 731 hits)

      Decision dated 02.11.2011 - Shri Ved Prakash Singhal, Nangloi Vs. Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (207.3 KiB, 965 hits)

      Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 1,253 hits)

    Section 24

      CIC Decision dated 07.05.2018 on the Appeal/Complaint filed by Mr. M. Dinesh Vs. PIO, Bureau of Immigration,IB (MHA) (362.6 KiB, 6,932 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,566 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 11.12.2015 on Appeal from Smt. Mukesh Devi, Distt. Alwar Vs. CPIO, Office of DG, CISF Camp, New Delhi (296.6 KiB, 11,870 hits)

      Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,221 hits)

      Decision dated 17.07.2013 - Dr. S. Chellappa, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, CBI, Hyderabad (209.9 KiB, 835 hits)

      Decision dated 10.07.2013 - Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 1,882 hits)

      Decision dated 13.06.2013 - Shri Kamal Sharma, Agra Vs. ACIT, Kanpur (64.6 KiB, 938 hits)

      Decision dated 10.05.2013 - Ms. Medha Rani, Chandigarh Vs. CPI, CBI, Chandigarh (208.2 KiB, 940 hits)

      Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri Prakash Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI (ACB), New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 995 hits)

    Section 24(1) 

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 25.01.2023 - CPIO, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau Vs. G.S. Srinivasan (639.8 KiB, 1,702 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Rajeev Kumar Agarwal Vs. PIO, CISF (312.8 KiB, 2,012 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 27.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Hari Gupta Vs. CPIO, Office of DG of Income Tax, Lucknow (188.2 KiB, 2,212 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 28.06.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Mandeep V. CPIO, Bureau of Immigration, New Delhi, CPIO, IB, New Delhi (641.0 KiB, 5,181 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 29.04.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Manoj Kumar v. CPIO, Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch, Patna (160.6 KiB, 5,788 hits)

      Delhi HC Judgment dated 16.01.2019 - Ehtisham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO Intelligence Bureau (370.6 KiB, 6,959 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,214 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 24.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Banarasi Rai, Madya Pradesh Vs. CPIO, CBI, Madhya Pradesh (338.0 KiB, 10,580 hits)

    Section 25 – Monitoring and Reporting

    Section 25(5) – Direction to the Public Authority

      CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,515 hits)

      CIC Decision dated 22.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi (884.2 KiB, 3,294 hits)

      Decision dated 12.01.2012 - Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 1,008 hits)

      Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 1,272 hits)

      Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 1,184 hits)

    Rule 3 of RTI Rules, 2012

      CIC Decision dated 05.04.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Sucheta Sureshkumar Vs. PIO, EPFO, Mumbai (61.1 KiB, 10,515 hits)

    —————————————————————–
    Constitution
    — Article 21

      CIC Decision dated 30.03.2017 on Second Appeal filed by Amrika Bai V. PIO, EPFO, Raipur (84.2 KiB, 10,251 hits)

    — Article 27

      CIC Decision dated 25.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Department of Revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others, including Delhi Waqf Board (433.8 KiB, 2,426 hits)

    * CrPC — S.125

      CIC Decision dated 30.03.2017 on Second Appeal filed by Amrika Bai V. PIO, EPFO, Raipur (84.2 KiB, 10,251 hits)

    ——————————————————————
    Go to SUBJECT-WISE DECISIONS
    —————————————————————–

    FULL BENCH DECISIONS OF CIC – Please click here.
    Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. If you  have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info[at]dtf.in.

    Check Also

    RTI Act/Rules

    RTI – Rules/Orders/Circulars

    LINKS TO OTHER RTI PAGES RTI Rules/Orders (Subject-Wise). Selected Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC). …

    One comment

    1. FANTASTIC WEBSITE! THANK YOU VERY MUCH! VERY USEFUL!