CHAPTER
II
PERSONNEL
POLICIES
(f) Conduct, Discipline
& Appeal Rules
10.
DPE/Guidelines/II(f)/10
Procedure for premature retirement of employees in Public Sector
Undertakings—provisions in the CDA Rules—regarding
The
Undersigned is directed to say that the question of incorporating
suitable
provisions in the CDA Rules in regard to premature retirement of
inefficient,
corrupt and medically unfit officials in PSUs has been engaging the
attention of
the Government. This issue had also been raised by the Central Vigilance
Commission and the Department of Personnel and Training. In view of
this, as
well as the importance of weeding out the inefficient, corrupt and
medically
unfit officials of PSUs, a review has been carried out in this regard in
consultation with the Department of Personnel and the Ministry of Law
&
Justice.
2.
It has now been decided that PSUs may incorporate suitable
provisions in
their CDA Rules/Service Regulations on the lines of FR 56[J] in the
Government
with a view to weed out the inefficient, corrupt and medically unfit
officials
after attaining the age of 50 years. This rule would, however not apply
to
employees covered under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. In this
connection,
the rules framed by SAIL are worth considering and a copy of it is
enclosed
[Annexure].
3.
Ministry of Agriculture etc. are requested to bring the contents
of this
O.M. to the notice of PSUs under their administrative control for
information
and necessary action under intimation to BPE.
(BPE O.M. No. 15(39)/84-GM dated
4th February, 1988)
ANNEXURE
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA
LTD.
Procedure for Premature
Retirement of
Executives
In accordance with clauses 4.3*
&
6.2** of the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, an executive who has attained
the age
of 50 years and is considered to be medically unfit, inefficient or of
doubtful
integrity, may be prematurely retired by the competent authority viz.
Chairman.
The criteria for judging the
medical
unfitness, inefficiency or doubtful integrity of executives proposed to
be
prematurely retired , follow:-
[i]
Inefficiency :
Inefficiency would be evaluated on the basis of the Appraisal
Reports. An
employee who has secured consecutively C-for three years in his
Appraisal
Reports, may be deemed as a fit case for premature
retirement.
[ii]
Doubtful Integrity:
An employee who gets an adverse comment consecutively for three
years on
his integrity in his CCR would be recommended for premature
retirement.
[iii]
Medical
Unfitness :
- The disease he is suffering from ;
- Whether it is curable or incurable;
- Whether the disease is infectious/contagious;
- In case of curable disease whether the person is likely to be fit to resume his normal duties within a period of 12 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vide PER/RR/4205 dated 16.6.84 and is
effective from 4.5.84
*4.3 : "The competent Authority
for
premature retirement in case of Executives will be
Chairman"
** 6.2 : " The Chairman may
pre-maturely
retire an executive who has attained the age of 50 years and is
considered to be
medically unfit, inefficient or of doubtful integrity".
2.
Benefits Under the Scheme:
In accordance with the clause
5.0 of the
Voluntary Retirement Scheme, an employee who is prematurely retired will
be
entitled to the following benefits:
DECISION 1.
Appraisal Reports of those
executives who
have been graded as C- or whose integrity has been considered doubtful,
will be
put up together every year to the Chief Executive of the Plant / Unit
concerned,
if such reports have not otherwise been put up to him as reviewing
officer or as
higher authority.
DECISION 2.
The format of the Order to be
issued to
the executive who is to be prematurely retired from the service of the
company
is annexed.
Vide No. PER/RR/4205 Dated
18-6-1984.
ANNEXURE
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA
LIMITED
NEW DELHI
To
Dear Sir,
On the basis of the records, the
Company
has decided to retire you under the Voluntary/Premature Retirement
Scheme with
immediate effect. You will be entitled to the following benefits
:–
2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.