INSURANCE NEWS
Insurer can’t deny claim on grounds of delayed filing, says Supreme Court
No insurance claim for theft committed without forcible entry, under the policy for burglary/house breaking
Go to NEWS.
- A forcible entry is required for a claim to be allowed under the policy for burglary/house breaking. – SC Judgement dated 22.08.2016 – M/s. Industrial Promotion & Investment Corp. of Orissa Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr. >>> Supreme Court Judgments
- RBI Master Direction dated 04.10.2017 – Non-Banking Financial Company – Peer to Peer Lending Platform (Reserve Bank) Direction, 2017
- RBI Circular dated 04.10.2017-Section 24 and Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Maintenance of SLR and holdings of SLR in HTM category
- RBI Circular dated 28.09.2017-Investment by Foreign Investors (FPI) in Government Securities Medium Term Framework >>> RBI Circulars
Insurer can’t deny claim on grounds of delayed filing, says Supreme Court
Timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Oct 8, 2017
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled that insurance claims cannot be denied to a person merely on the grounds of delay in filing the claim, holding that “mechanical” denials on technical bases will cause people to lose confidence in the industry.
A bench of Justice R K Agrawal and Justice S Abdul Nazeer set aside the verdicts of various consumer courts, including the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which had ruled that insurance companies could deny the benefit of cover for delay in filing the claims …
No insurance claim for theft committed without forcible entry, under the policy for burglary/house breaking
Aug 24, 2016 : Dtf.in
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled that a forcible entry is required for a claim to be allowed under the policy for burglary/house breaking.
Citing a 2004 SC judgment, Justice Rao said, “In the absence of violence or force, the insured cannot claim indemnification against the insurance company. The terms of the policy have to be construed as it is and we cannot add or subtract something. Howsoever liberally we may construe the policy, we cannot take liberalism to the extent of substituting the words which are not intended. “…in common parlance, the term ‘burglary’ would mean theft but it has to be preceded with force or violence. If the element of force or violence is not present, then the insured cannot claim compensation against theft from the insurance company.”
According to the counsel for the Appellant, forcible and violent entry is not necessary for making a valid claim under the policy.
The claim of the Appellant was repudiated by the insurance company on 31.03.1998 on the ground that the alleged loss did not come within the purview of the insurance policy.
The PSU’s appeal has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
More: SC Judgement dated 22.08.2016 – M/s. Industrial Promotion & Investment Corp. of Orissa Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr. >>> Supreme Court Judgments
You may like to click on any of the following links:-
* Latest DOPT/CVC/RTI/MOF/CGHS/DPE Orders/Circulars; News
* RBI Circulars / Orders / Guidelines / Reports / Policy Documents; Master Circulars (Subject-Wise)
* Vigilance Related GOI/CVC Orders/Circulars
* Right to Information (RTI) – Rules/ Notifications/Circulars/Guidelines (Subject-Wise)
* Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise
* CGHS Circulars/Empanelled Hospitals/Package Rates
Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. If you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info[at]dtf.in.