5 Steps to Take When You’re Accused of a Crime You Didn’t Commit
Owner must act within 12 years or squatter will get rights: SC
Criminal Trial- Evidence Of A Solitary Witness Will Call For Heightened Scrutiny: SC
‘Accused Can be Ordered to Give Voice Samples’: SC’s Crucial Ruling on Criminal Probes in India
Scope Of Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India: Important Judgments [Part-1]SC: Children of void marriage legitimate
Go to NEWS.
- The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (13.01.2017)
- The Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 2016 (As on DFS website-09.09.16)
- The Authentication (Orders and other Instruments) Rules, 1958 (As on MHA website – 19.01.2014)
- The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 (14.01.2014)
- The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 (15.12.2013)
- The Companies Act, 2013 (30.08.2013)
- The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (03.06.2013)
>>> Acts and Rules
Sep 3, 2019
Being accused of a crime you didn’t commit can be a horrible experience, especially if you’re worried about how you’re going to prove your innocence. Even if you have a decent alibi that shows you weren’t even at the scene of the crime, coordinating the details and witnesses in a manner that convinces a judge or jury to rule in your favour can seem like a challenge in and of itself. After all, the world is full of criminals who claim to be innocent, so how do you set yourself apart from the crowd? For starters, here are five steps you should take after being accused of a crime that you didn’t commit: …
8 Aug 2019
NEW DELHI: If a rightful owner of an immovable property fails to take action to get back possession within the limitation period then his rights are lost and person in possession acquires an absolute title, the Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday, but held that no benefit of adverse possession should be given to people who encroached upon public land. …
6 Aug 2019
The Supreme Court has observed that the evidence of a solitary witness in a criminal case requires heightened scrutiny.
The bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha observed as follows while considering an appeal [Jagdish vs. State of Haryana] against conviction recorded by the High Court: …
You may like to click on any of the following links:-
* Latest DOPT/CVC/RTI/MOF/CGHS/DPE/RBI Orders/Circulars; News
* Vigilance Clearance
* Right to Information (RTI) – Rules/ Notifications/Circulars
* Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise
* CGHS Circulars/Empanelled Hospitals/Package Rates
* Public Sector Enterprises Service Rules
* Verification of SC/ST/OBC Caste Status or Claims of SCs, STs and OBCs
* Court Judgments.
August 2, 2019
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that a judicial magistrate can order an accused to give his voice samples even against his consent in the course of a criminal investigation.
A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, decided the issue authoritatively after a division bench remained divided on the legality of such an order and referred the matter to the larger bench in 2012. …
28 May 2019
SARVEPALLI RAMAIAH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. V/s DISTRICTCOLLECTOR CHITTOOR DIST. & ORS., CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7461 OF 2009, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,DATE OF DECISION: 14.03.2019, CORAM: R. BANUMATHI & INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.
“Judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 is directed, not against the decision, but the decision-making process.” …
January 11, 2019
Holding that children of a void marriage are legitimate offspring, the Supreme Court has ruled that they can’t be denied the benefits of compassionate appointment.
Interpreting Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which confers legitimacy on children of void and voidable marriages, a Bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice MR Shah said denying compassionate appointment to a child born out of a void marriage was “deeply offensive”. …
Nov 27, 2018
NEW DELHI: A 62-year-old retired Delhi Police head constable had to run from pillar to post for over three months after Rs 10,000 was fraudulently withdrawn from his account by cyber crooks. …
Nov 7, 2018
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled against deferring witness deposition in a criminal case at the mere request of an accused and said courts of law had a duty to protect both the right of an accused for fair trial and the prosecution’s endeavour to prove its case. It also laid down a nine-point guideline for courts for conduct of criminal trials. …
Mar 3, 2018
MUMBAI: In a significant order issued recently, a full bench of the Bombay high court ruled courts and quasi-judicial forums in this country can take note of the conviction of an Indian citizen by a foreign court, but the judgement will not be binding on such authorities in India.
The full bench was called upon to decide the issue while dealing with an application filed by Prabodh Mehta, a trustee of the multi-specialty Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre in Bandra. In 2013, the joint charity commissioner had dismissed Mehta as a trustee of the hospital over his conviction for an offence involving moral turpitude by a court in Belgium. …
Feb 26, 2018
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has termed as “unfortunate” that in a number of cases, magistrates across India are not guided by concrete precedents set by it in exercising caution while applying their judicious mind.
Talking about the maxim that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done, the top court said the magistrates are expected to apply their independent mind while taking cognisance of a matter and such a view, should be reflected in the order. …
February 8, 2018
Disciplinary proceedings are not human rights violation and security agencies, exempted from the purview of the RTI Act, need not provide information on such issues, the Delhi High Court has ruled. The ruling by Justice Vibhu Bakhru came on a CBI plea challenging a Central Information Commission (CIC) order directing the agency to provide one of its officers the status and details of disciplinary proceedings against him. …
Jan 6, 2018
NEW DELHI: Striking hard at the societal tendency to impose restrictions on girls with regard to their choice of dress, profession and life partner, the Supreme Court on Friday declared that an adult woman enjoyed an unfettered right to lead a life of her choice.
“It needs no special emphasis to state that attaining the age of majority in an individual’s life has its own significance. S/he is entitled to make her/his choice. The courts cannot, as long as the choice remains, assume the role of parens patriae (legal protector),” said a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud. …
Dec 9, 2017
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to examine the constitutional validity of a 157-year-old ‘gender discriminatory’ provision in Indian Penal Code which punishes a married man for adultery for consensual sexual relations with another man’s wife.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud sought the Centre’s response in four weeks to a PIL by Joseph Shine from Kerala who is employed at Trento in Italy on why a married man alone and not the consenting wife of another should be hauled up. …
A Public Authority cannot act arbitrarily: SC
Oct 05, 2017 : Dtf.in
Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgement dated 24.08.2017 has, inter alia, held as under:-
“Undoubtedly, a development authority as a public body cannot act arbitrarily or at its own whims, in deciding whether or not to renew the lease. Its decisions must be guided by public interest. … However, exercise of discretion must meet the touchstone of Article 14 of the Constitution. As a public authority, the decision must be fair, reasonable and guided by public interest.”
More: Copy of the SC judgment dated 24.08.2017 >>> Supreme Court Judgments
Aug 15, 2017
NEW DELHI: Shedding its reluctance for years for audio-video recording of court proceedings, the Supreme Court on Monday favoured installation of CCTV cameras in all courts, including in the apex court itself, to record proceedings after the Centre backed the proposal.
In 2015, an SC bench, headed by then CJI H L Dattu, dismissed a PIL seeking its direction for video-recording of court proceedings. Similarly, the Bombay HC last year denied permission to introduce video recording, saying, “These are courts, not stages and sets from The Truman Show.” … Continue reading.
Jul 17, 2017
NEW DELHI: A 15-month-long study commissioned by the law ministry on trials of rape survivors has concluded that the provision under Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to complete a rape trial within two months of filing of the chargesheet was unrealistic.
The study said contrary to the provision in Section 309, even the survivor’s deposition was not completed in two months. The average time for deposition of the survivor was eight-and-a-half months, which continued beyond 15 months in some cases. …
Mar 10, 2017
NEW DELHI: Holding that speedy trial in criminal cases is part of the fundamental rights of an accused, the Supreme Court has suggested a time-frame for lower courts to decide a case to ensure that the accused do not languish in jail due to prolonged proceedings. …
Jan 21, 2017
AHMEDABAD: Gujarat high court has ruled that it cannot restrain any website or internet search engine Google from posting any of its orders online.
Justice RM Chhaya on Thursday turned down a petition filed by one Dharmraj Dave, who had urged the court to direct a law portal and tech-giant Google to delete an HC judgement from internet because such a public exhibition of the order might jeopardize his chances of migrating to Australia. …
Dec 9, 2016
NEW DELHI: Judges should not exhibit “judicial valour” by passing sweeping orders that encroach on the domain of the executive and legislature as the separation of powers among the organs of the state must be honoured, the Supreme Court has said. …
Nov 30, 2016
NEW DELHI: An adult son has no legal right to stay in his parents’ self-acquired property, the Delhi high court has ruled while upholding the wishes of an elderly couple who wanted their son and daughter-in-law evicted from their house. …
Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. However, in case you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info[at]dtf.in.