Disciplinary and Transparency Forum – India Diciplinary & Transparancy Forum
LINKS TO OTHER RTI PAGES
Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise.
Decisions of Central Information Commission (CIC) – Subject-Wise.
RTI – Rules/Guidelines/Orders (Date-Wise).
RTI Rules/Orders (Subject-Wise).
RTI – Court Judgements
MORE: Latest Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT)/DPPW Orders/Circulars
Go to RTI News. 2024 2023 10. In view of the above, the CPIO is directed to provide a revised reply on points no. 1, 2 & 3 as per the provisions of the RTI Act.” [Section 8(1)(h); CBI Investigation/Prosecution] 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012RECENT DECISIONS/JUDGEMENTS
“… … The definition cannot include within its fold answers to the question why which would be the same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not done in the sense of a justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justifications are matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information.” (Emphasis Supplied)
Hence, it was decided by the CIC that no intervention of the Commission at this stage was required in the matter. [Sections 2(f), 8(1)(h); Case under investigation]
Hence, the complaints were dismissed by the Hon’ble CIC. [Sections 8(1)(d) & (j), 11, 18, 20; Third Party Information, Indiscriminate Second Appeals/Complaints]
Further, copy of documents, as identified and desired by the Appellant was required to be provided free of cost upto 50 pages and thereafter upon receipt of RTI fees as per RTI Rules, 2012. In doing so, the CPIO was at liberty to redact the relevant records of third party’s disclosure of which stood exempted under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act by keeping in view the applicability of Section 10 of RTI Act for severance of records.
The CPIO was also directed to by the Commision to ensure that due assistance is provided to the Appellant during the inspection in accessing and identifying the records. [Sections 8(1)(j), 10; Inspection of Records, IT Search Operations]
It was further observed that point wise replies furnished by the CPIO to assist the Appellant was in the spirit of RTI, merits of which ccould not be called into question. [Sections 2(f), 7(9), 8(1)(d)(e) & (j); Humongous Information Sought by Applicant, Multiple RTI applications, SBI]
Gujarat High Court directed as under:-
Para 30
“In absence of any inherent or suo moto powers being vested in the commission by the RTI Act, the Commission could not have entertained an oral request and suo moto converted it into an RTI application; that too at an appellate stage.”
xxx xxx xxx
“40. Further despite the degree in question being put on the website of the petitioner University for all to see and despite this fact being made expressly clear with precision in the pleadings before this Court and despite the respondent never ever disputing the degree in question either during the pendency of these proceedings or even during final hearing, the respondent No.2 has persisted with the matter. This is one more reason to impose costs while allowing this petition.
41 Accordingly, petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 29.04.2016 passed in proceeding is quashed and set aside. Respondent No.2 is directed to pay costs of Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with Gujarat State Legal Services Authority within a period of 4 weeks from the date of this judgment.” – Gujarat HC Judgment dated 31.03.2023 – Gujarat University vs. M Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) & 3 other(s) – [Sec. 6(1), 8(1)(e) & (j); CM Arvind Kejriwal, Oral request suo motu converted into an RTI application; Educational document is personal information; Personal Information; Penalty on Respondent No.2]
— Delhi High Court: “Thus, considering the fact that the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau is clearly exempted under Section 24(1) read with Schedule II of the RTI Act, the direction of the CIC to provide the outcome of the complaint to the Respondent/ RTI Applicant is not sustainable and the same would be contrary to law. Accordingly, the said finding and direction of the CIC is set aside.” – Delhi HC Judgment dated 25.01.2023 – CPIO, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau Vs. G.S. Srinivasan
— Delhi High Court: “15. In the opinion of this Court, the information sought in the present petition would not be liable to be disclosed, owing to the nature of the information i.e., relating to senior personnel in the Navy. The CIC’s order does not warrant any interference.” – Delhi HC Judgment dated 11.01.2023 – Jagjit Singh Pal Singh Virk Vs. Union of India & Anr. [ACRs/Merit List of Naval Officer]
The Commission has also observed that the highest Court of the country in passing this order (on 13.05.1993 for special financial benefits from public treasury to only Imams and muezzins in the mosques) acted in violation of the provisions of the Constitution, particularly Article 27, which says that the tax payers money will not be used to favour any particular religion.
The Commission deemed this matter of extreme importance for the unity and integrity of the nation and interfaith harmony, and directed its registry to forward a copy of this order to Hon’ble Union Law Minister with the Commission’s recommendation for suitable action to ensure enforcement of provisions of Articles 25 to 28 of the Constitution of India in letter and spirit, to keep all religions of India at par in terms of payment of monthly remuneration of priests of different religions at the cost of the pubic exchequers (both Central and State) and also other matters. [Sections 5(4), 7(6), Art. 27 of Constitution; Imams of Masjid, Priest of Temple, Delhi Waqf Board]
In the light of the aforementioned decisions, and the fact that more than 118 cases of the same Appellant on the same subject matter have so far been adjudicated by different Information Commissioners of this Commission, the Commission is not inclined to entertain any further adjudication on the same subject, since no cause of action subsists under the RTI Act.”
[Multiple RTI Applications]
CIC: “… … the appellant was son of family pension holder Smt. Rebati Pati, hence, was entitled to the information sought by him. However, in compliance of the FAA’s order, the appellant had not provided the death certificate of account holder. In case he completes the formalities, the information may be provided to him…” [Sections 8(1)(e) & (j), 20(1); Family Pension Details]
[Section 24(1); CSIF as an exempted oganisation]
[UGC, Grievance Redressal Mechanism in UGC]
The Commission directed the FAA to place this order before their competent authority to ensure that action is expedited with respect to the upgradation of the BCI website while also incorporating the stipulations of the Commission in the H N Pathak case. The Commission also directed the CPIO to reiterate the opportunity of inspection of the available records to the Appellant and facilitate the same on a mutually decided date & time.[Conduct of FAA, Bar Council of India, Inspection of Colleges by BCI]
[Sec 24; Tax Evasion Petition (TEP), Exempted Organisation]
CIC: “8. In view of the above, the Commission hereby issues strict warning to the concerned CPIO for not providing the available information for so long. That the conduct of the concerned CPIO is highly objectionable and same should be brought to the notice of his controlling authority for an appropriate view. He is being reprimanded for future as the information that could have been provided on time, also not provided by the concerned CPIO. That the conduct of the concerned FAA is also found to be lacking as the first appeal has not been disposed off meticulously, therefore the FAA’s conduct should also be examined by its controlling authority.
9. xxx xxx Further, the Commission observes that if the technical vendor is not cooperating with the CPIO, the controlling authority should take an appropriate view on competence performance of the vendor. …..” [Conduct of the CPIO; FAA]
Regarding the prayer of the Appellant regarding the suo motu disclosure of the Cabinet note pertaining to The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 in light of the provisions of Section 4(1)(c) & 4(1)(d) of the RTI Act as well as Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act a copy of the order was marked to the Secretary, MoSJ, to look into the prayer of the Appellant. [Sections 4, 8(1)(i); Cabinet Note, etc., Public Authority]
Delhi High Court: It was held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court that “the legal position as settled by this court is that cogent reasons have to be given by the public authority as to how and why the investigation or prosecution will get impaired or hampered by giving the information in question.” [Exemption under Sec. 8(1)(h)] – Delhi HC Judgement dated 05.02.2021 – Amit Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi >>> RTI – Court Judgements
Delhi High Court: “On the basis of the above judgments, the following principles can be clearly gleaned:
i) CPIO/PIOs cannot withhold information without reasonable cause;
xxx xxx
v) PIO/CPIO cannot function merely as “post offices” but instead are responsible to ensure that the information sought under the RTI Act is provided
xxx xxx
viii) Information cannot be refused without reasonable cause.”
[Section 5(3), 5(4), 5(5), 8(1)(d); PIO/CPIO] – Delhi HC Judgement dated 22.01.2021 – Sh. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Erstwhile CPIO) Union Bank of India & Ors. Vs. Central Information Commission & Anr.
10. The details/copy of income tax returns and other personal information of third party need not to be disclosed to the appellant except as mentioned at para no. 9 above.” [Sections 8(1)(j), 19(3); Copy of Husband’s ITRs]
CIC: “Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during hearing, Commission observes that the Appellant is not satisfied with the information provided by the Respondent. It is further observed that the Appellant has brought in certain aspects during the hearing which is outside the adjudicatory powers of the Commission.
Hence, Commission deems it fit to remand the instant case back to Shri Tanvir Ahmed, FAA/ADM-North to provide a fair hearing to the relevant parties i.e., Appellant, Respondent and the BDO concerned and pass a reasoned, speaking order by 31.12.2020.. ..” [Agricultural Land]
The Commission observed that the PIO had made a mockery of the FAA’s order by merely re-sending the initial PIO reply, which had not been received by the Appellant till the date of hearing. The Commission directed the PIO to furnish a comprehensive status report with respect to the property under reference by the specified date failing which action would be initiated against the PIO as per the provisions of the RTI Act. [Immovable Property; PIO]
It is to be noted that the appellant has requested this Commission for disclosure of at least the ‘gross income’ of Mr. G H Sharanappa so that she could defend her matrimonial case. Therefore, considering the aspect of marital discord between the husband and wife vis-à-vis her right of maintenance, this Commission is of the opinion that the respondent should consider providing only the limited information of the last six years, i.e. the numerical figure(s) of the ‘gross income’ of her husband, Mr. G H Sharanappa …” [Sections 8(1)(j), 19(3),20; Income Tax Return Details of Spouse]
From the Respondent’s side, the hearing was attended by Dr. Sandeep Sharma, CPIO (SJH), Mr. Mahesh Mangla, CAPIO, SJH, Dr. R. Laxmi Narayan, ADG, ICMR, Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Prof. Chest Med. LHMC, Dr. U.B. Das, CMO, DGHS in person; Mr. Rajender Kumar, US, PH Division, M/o H&FW and Mr. G.P. Samanta, CPIO & US (Hospital-D) (SJH, RML and LHMC) through WhatsApp/TC. Expressing its displeasure at the state of affairs, the CIC advised the Secretary, M/o H&FW to designate an officer of an appropriate seniority as a Nodal Officer to examine the matter and suo motu disclose the information sought in the RTI application on the website of the Public Authority within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order in the larger public interest. [Section 4(1); Distt.-Wise No. of Hospitals for Covid Treatment]
“6. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, feels that it is necessary for both parties to be present for proper adjudication of the issues raised in the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is adjourned.” [Sections 8(1)(a)&(d), 11(1),20(1); Appeal from Public Authority]
The CIC in the case of the complaint filed by Mr. Anil Sood Vs. CPIO & Nodal Officer of Central Govt. Health Scheme, R.K. Puram Sector 12, New Delhi-22, observed on May 01, 2020 that there was complete negligence and laxity in the public authority (CGHS) in dealing with the RTI applications. It is abundantly clear that such matters are being ignored and set aside without application of mind which reflected disrespect towards the RTI Act, 2005 itself. The Commission expressed its displeasure on the casual and callous approach adopted by the respondent (CGHS) in responding to the RTI application. It was felt that the conduct of Respondent was against the spirit of the RTI Act, 2005 which was enacted to ensure greater transparency and effective access to the information. [PIO, Public Authority, CGHS, Supply of Medicines to WCs]
(i) An advisory was issued u/s 25(5) of the RTI Act to the Secretary DoPT to evolve a system after coordinating with the Director General, NIC in the spirit of the RTI Act and take immediate steps towards providing a platform for implementation of Sec 7(1) of the RTI Act.
(ii) A report on the action taken on the advisory might be sent to the Commission by the Secretary, DoPT within 7 days from the date of withdrawal of lockdown. Due to the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus in the country and the prevalent lock down, the Commission found it appropriate to highlight the issue of Sec 7(1) implementation by citizens more so, when postal receipt of RTI applications are minimal, in such situations all public authorities should encourage RTI applications through e-mail in case of life and liberty matter.
(iii) A unique e-mail id can be created by the CPIOs in this regard and reflected in their respective website. A method of online acceptance of RTI fees also has to be thought of in this regard. In so far as other normal RTIs are concerned, the RTI portal can be used. The Deputy Registrar was directed to circulate this order widely to the public authorities related to the Registry. [Sections 4(1)(b), 7(1), 19(1), 25(5); Sports Quota, Delhi University, Public Authority, Minutes of Meeting]
The Hon’ble Commission also directed the present CPIO to comply with the direction given by the FAA. It was also ordered by the Hon’ble Commission that the CPIO should note that at this stage he cannot transfer the RTI application, however, he could obtain information from its custodian after seeking assistance u/s 5(4) of the RTI Act. It was further ordered that the onus was now on him to obtain the required information and provide it to the appellant as per the timeline specified in the Decision. [Sections 5(4), 20; CPIO, Construction Work]
SC: “42. … … In the absence of inherent inconsistency between the provisions of the RTI Act and other law, overriding effect of RTI Act would not apply.
(ii) The information to be accessed/certified copies on the judicial side to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the High Court Rules, the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to.” – (Secs. 2, 4(b), 6(2), 8(1)(a) to (j), 19, 22, 31; Disclosure of Information; Certified Copies of Court Documents)- SC Judgment dated 04.03.2020 – Chief Information Commissioner v. High Court of Gujarat and Another >>> RTI – Court Judgements
x x x
Therefore, without commenting on the merits of the rival contentions made by the parties, the Commission deems it appropriate to dismiss these appeals and complaints.
Note: The cases listed from serial no. 12 to 21 are being disposed of collectively on the same day, without issuing notice of hearing, being frivolous and repetitive in nature.
x x x
In the context of the aforesaid observations, the Commission does not find it expedient to afford any further opportunity of hearing in the above listed cases from serial no. 12 to 21 as well as similar cases of the appellant which may be pending with the Commission.” [Improper Use of RTI Act)
[Hearing by FAA]
In view of the foregoing, Commission directs the CPIO to provide available and specific information sought in the RTI Application in a point-wise manner to the Appellant … …
Further, Commission finds that the incorrect connotation ascribed by the CPIO to the proviso to Section 24(1) of RTI Act that it is only applicable to cases involving CBI’s own employees may result in gross violation of the provisions of RTI Act by the Respondent office in future.” [Section 24(1); Corruption, Appointment]
Commission severely admonishes the CPIO on both the above counts and warns him to remain extremely careful in future.” [ Sections 4(1)(b), 8(1)(d) & (j); Payment of Fees; Salary of Employees]
23. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the CIC to consider afresh having regard to the observations made in this order.” [Sections 8, 19(3), 24(1); Section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; Copy of IB Report]
xxx xxx A copy of this order is marked to the Secretary, Central Vigilance Commission to look into the aspect of inordinate delay in completing enquiry/investigation by CVC and take corrective
action as deemed fit.” [Complaint, Inquiry, CVC]
SC: “Additionally, we think it appropriate to ask the authorities to explore any kind of advanced technology that has developed in the meantime so that other methods can be introduced. We are absolutely sure that if the petitioner would point out, the cognizance of the same shall be taken. We are also certain that the authority shall, with all sincerity and concern, explore further possibilities with the available on-line application/mechanism.” – SC Judgment dated 27.09.2018 – Aseer Jamal Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court has held as under:-
“… … the CPIO being custodian of the information or the documents sought for, is primarily responsible under the scheme of the RTI Act to supply the information and in case of default or dereliction on his part, the penal action is to be invoked against him only. The Appellate Authority is not the custodian of the information or the document. It is only a statutory authority to take a decision on an appeal with regard the tenability or otherwise of the action of the CPIO and, therefore, there is a conscious omission in making the Appellate Authority liable for a penal action under Section 20 of the RTI Act and if that be the scheme of the Act and the legislative intention, we see no error in the order passed by the learned writ Court warranting reconsideration.” [Sections 19(1), 20 of the RTI Act] – Delhi HC Judgment dated 29.08.2018 – R.K. Jain Vs. Union of India
“The society is a creation of MCI, housed in the MCI building for extending ease of functioning. In garb of functional autonomy, the parent body MCI cannot be said to have abrogated its right to access information from the society.”
“The process of bestowing national honours cannot be kept away from public scrutiny. Any practice facilitating opacity will go on to diminish the sanctity of the honour and its past recipients.”
The CPIO, MCI was accordingly directed to access information from Secretary, Dr. B.C. Roy National Award Fund and furnish the same to the appellant. [Dr. B.C. Roy National Award]
The Deputy Registrar was directed to send complete RTI application file to the CPIO for taking necessary action. [First Appellate Authority (FAA)]
The appellant was seeking information about his own travel details to prove his innocence in a criminal proceeding. The information sought was crucial to the appellant for a fair opportunity of self defence. The Hon’ble Commission was not considering the culpability or innocence of the appellant in the criminal case set up against him; but declining a fair opportunity to arrange for material of self defence would certainly breach the human right of appellant. Furthermore, there was no impediment in terms of exceptions carved out in Section 8 of the RTI Act prohibiting dissemination of information sought. Accordingly, the Commission directed the PIO, Bureau of Immigration, Intelligence Bureau/MHA to provide complete information sought within four weeks of receipt of the order. [Sections 8 & 24; Human Rights; Self Defence]
directs the FAA, Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, Visakhapatnam, to inquire into the matter as to whether the RTI application was received in the branch and, if so, what action was taken on the RTI application. The FAA shall also, if required, take appropriate departmental action against the officers responsible for the misplacement of the RTI application. A copy of the inquiry report along with the action taken report may be provided to the Commission as well as to the appellant within a period of six weeks. …” [FAA, CPIO, Departmental Action for Misplacement of RTI Application]
30. The Complaint is accordingly dismissed.” [Sections 4(1)(b), 18(1)(f); Disclosure Policy]
The Member Secretary has been directed to explain why the NCW should not be ordered to pay compensation to the appellant for the harassment. In exercising the powers under section 18 (1) of RTI Act, the respondent authority has been directed to conduct inquiry into the appellant’s complaints, and to provide the report to the Commission. [Sections 7(9), 8(i)(j), 18(1), 19(3)&(6), 20, Sexual Harassment Act, 2013; FAA, Compensation to RTI Applicant]
6. In the light of the foregoing, we direct the Respondent public authority to appoint a nodal CPIO or designate one of the existing CPIOs as the nodal CPIO and give wide publicity to his name, designation and address. It will be the task of this nodal CPIO to discharge the responsibilities contained in the directions of the High Court of Delhi mentioned in paragraph 4 above.” [Nodel CPIO]
[Sections 8 (1)(e)]
34. The Commission strongly recommends to implement the recommendations of NCRWC, Second ARC and replace the ‘oath of secrecy’ with ‘oath of transparency” so that the Minister will respect the right to information of the citizen, which was passed by the Parliament and considered as fundamental right intrinsic in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, and be answerable/accountable to the citizens.” [Sections 2(h), 4(1)(b), 8(1), 8(2), 19(8) and 22; Appointment with Minister]
* CIC Decision dated 11.12.2015 on Appeal from Smt. Mukesh Devi, Distt. Alwar Vs. CPIO, Office of DG, CISF Camp, New Delhi – CIC: “…. the Commission would like the CISF to consider the request of the complainant and provide information to the extent possible to the appellant. (Section 24(1), Exempt Organisation)
* CIC Decision dated 09.12.2015 on Appeal from Dr. A.L. Agarwal Vs. Delhi University The CIC, inter alia, ordered that “Public authority should read Section 16 of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 along with the rules made under this Act and circulars of DoPT which specifically direct them to provide a copy of sexual harassment complaint to charged officer.” [Section 8(1)(e),(g) and (j), Complaint of Sexual Harassment]
* CIC Decision dated 30.11.2015 on Appeal from Dr. D. Dhaya Devadas & Shri V. Sundaram Vs. CPIO, Indian Bureau of Mines, Chennai (Full Bench Decision) (Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 27.11.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Nirmal Kumar Agarwal, Kheri (UP) Vs. CPIO, Department of Posts, Kheri – CIC: “After hearing submissions of both the parties the Commission directs the CPIO to provide copy of the investigation report regarding the account(s) of the appellant & his family members …” (Investigation Report, Post Office Accounts)
* CIC Decision dated 27.11.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Kunjan Tripathi, Distt. Kanpur (Dehat) Vs. CPIO, Department of Posts, Kanpur – CIC: “The RTI Act is not the proper law for redressal of grievances/disputes and there are other appropriate forum(s) for resolving such matters.” (RTI not appropriate forum for redressal of grievances/disputes).
* CIC Decision dated 09.11.2015 on Appeal from Shri R.K. Jain Vs. Delhi University – CIC: “The Commission having heard the submissions and perused the record, considers that it is a case where the CPIO returned the original RTI application along with the IPO, which means a total and complete refusal to act under the provisions of RTI Act, which appears to be a serious breach of RTI Act. The Commission directs the CPIO to explain and show cause as to why maximum penalty should not be imposed against him and why compensation should not be granted to the appellant and disciplinary action should not be recommended against him.”
* CIC Decision dated 21.10.2015 on Appeal from Mr. David George Thomas Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests – The Commission directed the respondent public authority, inter alia, to explain reasons for this non-publication of policy related information about Solar Thermal projects as mandated by Section 4(1) of RTI Act, to explain why adequate compensation should not be given to the appellant, and to provide necessary training to CPIOs to understand their duties under Environment Protection Act, RTI Act, duties as the CPIO representing the entire public authority. [Sections 4(1)(d) & (e)]
* CIC Decision dated 15.10.2015 on Appeal from Shri Durga Prasad Kushwaha, Katni Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jabalpur – The Commission held that the attendance in respect of employees of public authority is disclosable information and the CPIO was directed to provide computerized attendance sheet in respect of the former Branch Manager, LIC, for the specified period in 2013, severing any personal information like the reason of leave/not attending etc. [Sections 8(1)(e),(g) & (j)]
* CIC Decision dated 23.09.2015 on Appeal from Indian Technomac Company Ltd., New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Bank of India, Janpath, New Delhi – CIC: “However, the crux of the matter is that the information should have been sought by a citizen in his individual capacity. ….. in the instant case, there is no doubt whatsoever that M/s Indian Technomac Company Ltd. were the RTI applicant, the Appellant before the FAA and are the Appellant before the Commission. As a legal entity, they cannot seek information under the RTI Act.” (Sections 8(1)(d) & (e), 19)
* CIC Decision dated 11.09.2015 on Appeal from Shri Biswamber Nayak Vs. Batra Hospital & Medical Research Centre, New Delhi – Batra Hospital is covered under the RTI Act. [Section 2(h)]
* CIC Decision dated 07.09.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sultan Singh Vs. PIO, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi – The Commission directed the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue Department Head Quarters (Delhi), inter alia, to explain to the appellant and the Commission what measures they have taken to correct the unconstitutionally given caste certificates to Chamars as “Jatavs”, etc., since 2011 till today, and when do they start certifying the applicants with their original caste names. (SC Certificate)
* CIC Decision dated 13.08.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sunhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. PIO, Min. of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi – CIC: The Commission directed the respondent officer to provide complete information for points 7 and 8 of the RTI application together with related documents free of cost … The Commission also directed the CPIO/PMO and CPIO/DOPT to provide information sought, appear before the Commission to report compliance to the Commission. [Sec. 7(6), 8(1) (e) and (j), 11]
* CIC Decision dated 10.08.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Chandratan, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Office of Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Surat – CIC: The appellant has not succeeded in establishing that the information sought was for larger public purpose. [Sec. 8(1)(j), Larger Public Interest]
* CIC Decision dated 03.08.2015 – Ms. Poonam Kumari, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commssion, New Delhi – CIC: The Commission directed the CPIO to communicate the reason for non-selection of the candidate.
* CIC Decision dated 15.06.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO & Dy.DG, Deptt. of Posts, New Delhi – CIC: He (Appellant) has suggested that IPO should be made ‘payable at par’ at all post offices without mentioning the name of the paying post office. The appellant’s suggestion carries merit and the postal authorities should look into the same and send an appropriate response to him within 6 weeks.
* CIC Decision dated 03.06.2015 on Appeal filed by Rakhee Marwah Vs. PIO, SDM (Saket), New Delhi – CIC: The Commission found reasonable grounds to inquire (as provided under Section 19(2) of RTI Act) into the matter of issuing income certificate to a person, and into the allegation of suppressing the file, partly in the beginning and some part even now, and furnish report to the Commission within 30 days. The Commission also directed the respondent authority to pay compensation of Rs 10,000 to the appellant, for denying and harassing the appellant by not giving information in stipulated time on the pretext of missing file.
* CIC Decision dated 29.05.2015 on Appeal filed by Shri H.K. Sehgal Vs. Delhi Jal Board – CIC: The Commission directed the respondent authority to evolve an online grievance redressal mechanism and redress the same within 25 days. The Commission also advised the Public Authority to take mobile number and email ID of the consumers, so that they can communicate about the dues, payments, nonpayments, etc. through SMS or email.
* CIC Decision dated 30.04.2015 on Appeal from Surender Vishwakarma Vs. Department of Justice, GOI, New Delhi – CIC: The Commission having heard the submissions and perused the record, observes that the information sought by the appellant is from the year 1952 to 2015 that is for 63 years which is very unreasonable as the same is very voluminous. The appellant ….. could not convince the Commission why he needs this huge information. The Commission, therefore, does not interfere with the FAA order and dismisses the appeal. (Voluminous Information)
* CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi – The Commission directed the PIO/DTTE to inform the reasons for delay in giving the appellant the selection grade and also provide complete correspondence between the respondent and the DTTE within 15 days The Commission also directed to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for not giving complete information to the appellant. (Disclosure of Reasons)
* CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi – CIC: “Hence, the Commission holds that there is a larger public interest that require disclosure of medical records of a patient as mandated under Section 8(1)(j) and directs the respondent authority to furnish the information about the medical records of her husband to the extent ….” (Sections 2,3,4,6(2),7,8,11,18,19, Right to Privacy, Larger Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai – The Commission directed the FAA, Life Insurance Corporation to issue instructions to all the Divisional Offices for charging correct premium in this regard under intimation to the Commission.
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon – The Commission directed the department to compensate the appellant by an amount of Rs.1000/- for the inconvenience and detriment caused to him. [Section 19(8)(b)].
* CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla – The basic protection afforded by virtue of the exemption from disclosure enacted under Section 8(1)(j) cannot be lifted or disturbed unless the petitioner is able to justify how such disclosure would be in ‘public interest’. [Section 8(1)(j)]
* DoPT Circular dated 17.03.2015 – Format for giving information to the applicants under RTI Act-seeking comments from public regarding
* Office of the Attorney General of India is a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. – Delhi High Court Judgment dated 10.03.2015 – Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Office of Attorney General and R.K. Jain Vs. Office of Attorney General of India
* CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi – The Department of Posts has been requested to look into the issue and take appropriate steps to provide access to PIN code to prisoners lodged in various jails. (Larger Public Interest)
* CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (Non-Disclosure Agreement, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (Voluminous Records, Section 10) * CIC Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi [Section 5(4)] * CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi – The Commission directed the CPIO of MoEF to, inter alia, perform their obligation under Section 4(1)(c) and 4(1)(d) of RTI Act, 2005, and to furnish the reasons for formulating the policy of not imposing any restrictions and instead permitting the DDA to go ahead with unrestricted installation of Mobile Towers in the lands of DDA, in spite of recommendations against. The Commission also recommended the Chief Minister’s Office and office of Lieutenant Governor to probe into the reasons for ignoring these vital reports and their recommendations about the adverse effects of EMF from Mobile Towers and also to inform the people as to what measures they would initiate in response to the recommendations of the Inter Ministerial Group or if they have rejected the recommendation, the reasons and grounds for the same. (Sections 4(1)(c)&(d)/Disclosure of Reasons) * CIC Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi – “The Commission directed the respondent authority to furnish information to the appellant as to the reasons for denial of Selection Grade to him as they are bound to give the same under Section 4(1)(c.) …” (Section 4(1)(c)/Disclosure of Reasons) * O.M. dated 17.02.2015 – Guidelines for Public Information Officers/FAAs for supply of information and disposal of first appeal respectively – reiteration of >>> RTI – Rules/Circulars
* Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) – “The Commission reiterates that the Bar Council of Delhi should initiate proceedings against the complainant for alleged misconduct of sending a blank paper as RTI application and causing wastage of public money and time of Public Authority.” (Misuse of RTI/Action against Complainant) * Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi – “The Commission after hearing the submissions made directs the PIO to obtain the information from the Society and furnish the same to the Complainant within thirty days of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi – “The Commission, therefore, directs the respondent authority to inquire into the complaint of the complainant and provide the action taken report on the same within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.” (Section 18) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi “The Commission also advises the appellant not to file repeated RTI applications which are aimless and useless. The Commission also advises the respondent authority not to share any personal information of the officers with the people like the appellant without invoking Section 11 of the RTI Act.” (Abuse of RTI) * CIC Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi – “The CPIO is directed to provide to the Appellant copies of such agreements, if available on the records of the public authority, by severing any information of a personal nature concerning the advocates, such as their personal address, bank account and income tax details etc., under Section 10 of the RTI Act.” [Section 10] * CIC Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai – The Commission cautioned the FAA to strictly follow the RTI regime while disposing of appeals and pass a speaking order, after taking due cognizance of merits of each case. * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi – “… names, addresses and phone nos./email addresses of all plaintiffs cannot be provided to the appellant as the same is third party information u/s 8(1)(j), the disclosure of which serves no larger public interest. … .. the appellant has neither suffered any detriment nor is there any public interest in seeking the information. Therefore, his plea for award of compensation is not accepted.” * Copy of Minutes of the CIC Meeting dated 13.12.2011, reg. norms for according priority to appeals/complaints filed before the Commission (As on CIC website-01.02.15) * CIC Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore – “The appellant has not succeeded in demonstrating that the information asked for by him is in larger public interest. It being so, there is no need to interfere with the respondent’s decision.” [Section 8(1)(j)] * CIC Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi – “… the candidate with regard to his/her own answer sheet can obtain the copy of the same as a matter of right, but with regard to the answer sheet of third party, unless the candidate is able to show that large public interest is involved, the same cannot be furnished unless the candidate from whom it is sought for permits the same.” The Commission, therefore, directed to follow the procedure for supplying third party information U/S 11 of RTI Act, by seeking the opinion of the third party and taking a final decision by the PIO in this respect. [Sections 3, 8(1)(j), 11 and 19(3)] * CIC Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi – “The Commission require the Chief Secretary of Delhi and Union Cabinet Secretary to disclose their policy on this issue under Section 4 of Right to Information Act and also inform the appellants about their proposed steps to implement recommendation of Lokayuktha of Delhi in effectively preventing photo publicity of the political rulers.” * CIC Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal, New Delhi – The Commission recommended change of officer to be designated as FAA. * CIC Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi [Sections 7(9), 18 & 20)] * CIC Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi – The CIC has directed the Law Ministry to disclose the Cabinet note about the decision to establish a National Judicial Appointments Commission, saying that such documents are not secret and should thus be made public.
SELECTED CIC DECISIONS (DATE-WISE)
(a) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.01.2016 Onwards), (b) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.01.2015 To 31.12.2015), (c) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2014 To 31.12.2014), (d) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.01.2014 To 30.09.2014), (e) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2013 To 31.12.2013), (f) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2013 To 30.09.2013), (g) CIC DECISIONS (From 15.02.2013 To 30.06.2013), (h) CIC DECISIONS (From 01.10.2012 To 15.10.2012), (i) CIC DECISIONS (01.07.2012 To 30.09.2012), (i) CIC DECISIONS (01.04.2012 To 30.06.2012), (k) CIC DECISIONS (01.01.2012 To 31.3.2012), (l) CIC DECISIONS (01.10.2011 To 31.12.2011)
(a) 
CIC Decision dated 04.04.2024 on the second appeal filed by Chandrakant Shah Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank, New Delhi (709.6 KiB, 127 hits) CIC Order dated 16.01.2024 on the second appeal filed by Shri Govind Prasad Goel Vs. Manager, RTI, FCI, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh (310.1 KiB, 511 hits) CIC Order dated 12.01.2024 on the second appeal filed by Mandeep Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, Bengaluru (174.9 KiB, 477 hits) CIC Order dated 28.12.2023 on the second appeal filed by Harmohan Kumar Arora Vs. CPIO, UCO Bank, Kolkata (145.4 KiB, 477 hits) CIC Decision dated 25.10.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Subrata Goswami vs. PIO, Department of Posts, Yogayog Bhawan, C.R. Avenue, Kolkata-12 (289.8 KiB, 759 hits) CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ram Meena vs. PIO, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, I.P. Estate, New Delhi (324.5 KiB, 749 hits) CIC Decision dated 27.09.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Yash Malhotra vs. CPIO, Income Tax Department, Vikas Bhawan, IP Estate, New Delhi (355.0 KiB, 757 hits) CIC Decision dated 21.08.2023 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Agrawal v. PIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (1.0 MiB, 1,154 hits) CIC Decision dated 06.07.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi vs. O/o of Pr. Chief Commissioner of (IT), CCA), Kanpur and O/o of Addl./Jt. CIT, Central Range, Meerut (208.6 KiB, 1,107 hits) CIC Decision dated 09.06.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Raman Verma vs. Regional Business Officer-IV, Mohali, SBI, Patiala, Punjab (630.8 KiB, 1,150 hits) CIC Decision dated 24.04.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Satwant Singh Yadav vs. PIO, PMA Cell, Director Police-I, Ministry of Home Affairs (877.7 KiB, 1,544 hits) Gujarat HC Judgment dated 31.03.2023 - Gujarat University vs. M Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) & 3 other(s) (796.5 KiB, 1,851 hits) Delhi HC Judgment dated 25.01.2023 - CPIO, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau Vs. G.S. Srinivasan (639.8 KiB, 1,653 hits) Delhi HC Judgment dated 11.01.2023 - Jagjit Singh Pal Singh Virk Vs. Union of India & Anr. (710.4 KiB, 1,559 hits) CIC Decision dated 06.01.2023 on the Second Appeal filed by Ms Renu Bala Kochhar Vs. Public Information Officers, DDA, New Delhi (375.5 KiB, 2,206 hits) CIC Decision dated 25.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Department of Revenue, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others, including Delhi Waqf Board (433.8 KiB, 2,387 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Chitresh Kumar Banjare Vs. PIO (1) Delhi Police & (2) Delhi State Legal Services Authority (3.9 MiB, 1,991 hits)
CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Sura Prasad Pati Vs. CPIO, Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India), Bhubaneswar (143.2 KiB, 1,931 hits)
CIC Decision dated 01.11.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Rajeev Kumar Agarwal Vs. PIO, CISF (312.8 KiB, 1,975 hits)
CIC Order dated 16.09.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Gautam Saren Vs. CPIO, National Test House, Kolkata (1.4 MiB, 2,875 hits)
CIC Decision dated 04.08.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Prakash Gopalan Vs. Public Information Officer, Office of CPMG, Kerala Circle, Deptt. of Posts, Thiruvananthapuram (507.4 KiB, 2,752 hits)
CIC Order dated 01.08.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Anil Kumr Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Canara Bank, Hapur (180.9 KiB, 2,752 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.06.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Dr. Rajiv Khatri Vs. CPIO, University Grants Commission, New Delhi (1.1 MiB, 2,776 hits)
CIC Decision dated 25.05.2022 on the Second Appeal,Complaint filed by Prasoon Shekhar Vs. CPIO, Bar Council of India, New Delhi (188.2 KiB, 2,716 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Hari Gupta Vs. CPIO, Office of DG of Income Tax, Lucknow (188.2 KiB, 2,174 hits)
CIC Decision dated 25.04.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Savio J.F. Correia Vs. CPIO, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa (196.5 KiB, 2,162 hits)
CIC Decision dated 23.02.2022 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Sh. Nagsen Rajaram Suralkar Vs. Department of Posts, Office of Supdt. of Post Office, Bhuswal, Maharashtra (179.9 KiB, 2,313 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.02.2022 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Sh. J.P. Tiwari Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (190.6 KiB, 2,191 hits)
CIC Order dated 03.01.2022 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Om Prakash Vijaivergia Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Siliguri, Darjeeling, West Bengal (140.3 KiB, 2,217 hits)
CIC Decision dated 29.10.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. Dhavalkumar Kirtikumar Patel Vs. CPIO, National Mission for Manuscripts, New Delhi, and CPIOs of 4 other organisations (430.2 KiB, 2,211 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.10.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Love Gogia Vs. CPIO, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Office of CGM, Pune (222.5 KiB, 2,318 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.08.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Saurav Das Vs. CPIO, Department of Health & Family Welfare (1.9 MiB, 2,476 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.08.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Shyamlal Yadav Vs. PIO, CPV Division, Ministry of External Affairs (729.2 KiB, 2,421 hits)
CIC Decision dated 17.05.2021 on the Complaint filed by Shri Aniket Gaurav Vs. PIO, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (15.8 MiB, 2,555 hits)
CIC Decision dated 23.03.2021 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Department of Social Justice & Empowerment, New Delhi (138.3 KiB, 2,767 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.02.2021 on the Second Appeal filed by Jitendra Kumar vs. CPIO, O/o Income Tax Officer, Aligarh, UP (151.8 KiB, 2,985 hits)
Delhi HC Judgement dated 05.02.2021 - Amit Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Central Information Commission, New Delhi (489.9 KiB, 3,316 hits)
Delhi HC Judgement dated 22.01.2021 - Sh. Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Erstwhile CPIO) Union Bank of India & Ors. Vs. Central Information Commission & Anr. (889.7 KiB, 4,066 hits)
CIC Decision dated 28.12.2020 on the Second Appeals filed by Deeksha Chaudhary Vs. CPIO, Air India Ltd., New Delhi (1.2 MiB, 3,039 hits)
CIC Decision dated 21.12.2020 on the Second Appeal by Vihar Durve Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Mumbai (140.3 KiB, 3,633 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.11.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Rahmat Bano Vs. Office of Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan (157.9 KiB, 3,160 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.11.2020 on the Complaint filed by Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Mumbai (150.7 KiB, 3,149 hits)
CIC Decision dated 30.10.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Shri Kuldeep Kumar Baranwal v. CPIO, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi (489.0 KiB, 3,390 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.09.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Mahendra Singh Vs. PIO/SDM (Narela), Naya Bans, Delhi through Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Consultant of PIO (695.0 KiB, 3,173 hits)
CIC Decision dated 26.08.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Meeta Agrawal Vs. CPIO, DGM(G) & Nodal PIO, North Central Railway, RTI Cell, Subedarganj, Allahabad (787.5 KiB, 3,330 hits)
CIC Decision dated 23.07.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Saurav Das Vs. CPIOs, ICMR, and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (277.4 KiB, 3,322 hits)
CIC Decision dated 20.07.2020 on the Second Appeal/Complaint by Smt. Savitri Devi Vs. PIO, NDMC, Narela Zone, New Delhi (195.7 KiB, 3,311 hits)
CIC Decision dated 10.07.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Basavantamma Vs. CPIO, Office of the Income Tax Officer, Bengaluru (818.8 KiB, 3,195 hits)
CIC Decision dated 24.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Shri Baljeet Singh Vs. CPIO, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh (Haryana) (815.2 KiB, 3,399 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.06.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. CPIO, Office of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Settlement Commission, Mumbai/Kolkata/New Delhi/Chennai (584.0 KiB, 3,442 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.06.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Venkatesh Nayak Vs. CPIO, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (312.0 KiB, 3,043 hits)
CIC Order dated 03.06.2020 on the Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das on behalf of the HDFC Bank Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (160.6 KiB, 3,122 hits)
CIC Decision dated 01.05.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Anil Sood Vs. CPIO & Nodal Officer, Office of Central Govt. Health Scheme. R.K. Puram Sector 12, New Delhi-22 (1.4 MiB, 4,639 hits)
CIC Decision dated 24.04.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Smt. Kairun BiBi Vs. CPIO, Steel Authority of India, Dhanbad (530.5 KiB, 3,241 hits)
CIC Decision dated 23.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Varun Krishna Vs. CPIO & Dy. GM (Legal), Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., New Delhi (1.8 MiB, 3,337 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.04.2020 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta Vs. CPIO, University of Delhi (884.2 KiB, 3,254 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Ajay Manda Vs. CPIO, Ch. Charan Singh National Institute of Agriculture Marketing, Jaipur (260.7 KiB, 3,411 hits)
CIC Decision dated 17.03.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Mr. D.T. Eshwaran Vs. CPIO, Central Govt. Employees Welfare Housing Organization, New Delhi (500.9 KiB, 3,249 hits)
CIC Decision dated 21.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Amit Khera v. CPIO, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Delhi (253.6 KiB, 3,931 hits)
CIC Decision dated 10.02.2020 on the Second Appeal filed by Ajay Kumar v. CPIO, Northern Central Railway, Agra (122.5 KiB, 3,511 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.02.2020 on the Second Appeal by Mr. Rana Ranjan v. CPIO, National Insurance Company Ltd., Bhavnagar, Gujarat (221.4 KiB, 3,671 hits)
CIC Decision dated 20.12.2019 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Kripalani M. v. CPIO, Office of Pr. Commissioner of Customs, Menezies Aviation Cargo Terminal, Bangaluru (Full Bench Decision) (257.7 KiB, 3,611 hits)
Delhi High Court judgment dated 17.12.2019 - Election Commission of India Vs. Central Information Commission and Anr. (364.3 KiB, 4,171 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.12.2019 on the Complaint filed by Neeraj Sharma v. CPIO, National Payments Corporation of India, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (1.0 MiB, 3,611 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.12.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Priti Ranjan Das Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 4,001 hits)
CIC Decision dated 29.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui v. CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (456.2 KiB, 3,603 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Shiv Kumar Kanoi Vs. CPIO, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Mumbai (151.9 KiB, 3,948 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Anand Nallan Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (158.7 KiB, 3,942 hits)
CIC Decision dated 07.11.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Rakesh Sharma Vs. Asstt. Secretary & CPIO, Central Board of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Allahabad (520.3 KiB, 4,287 hits)
Madras HC Judgment dated 16.10.2019 - The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, Chennai (234.3 KiB, 4,627 hits)
Delhi HC Judgment dated 10.10.2019 - Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Vs. Krishan Kumar (463.3 KiB, 4,552 hits)
CIC Decision dated 09.09.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Vipin Jain v. CPIO, UCO Bank, Indore (150.0 KiB, 4,663 hits)
CIC Decision dated 01.08.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Nikhil Kumar Singh v. CPIOs, Central Board of Secondary Education (176.0 KiB, 5,048 hits)
CIC Decision dated 29.07.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Ms. Renu Garg v. CPIOs, Delhi Police (136.5 KiB, 4,964 hits)
CIC Decision dated 02.07.2019 on the Second Appeal file by Commodore Lokesh K. Batra V. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (146.3 KiB, 5,121 hits)
CIC Decision dated 28.06.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Mandeep V. CPIO, Bureau of Immigration, New Delhi, CPIO, IB, New Delhi (641.0 KiB, 5,150 hits)
CIC Decision dated 12.06.2019 on the second Appeal filed by Ujwala Kokde V. CPOI, Ministry of Home Affairs, Judicial Division, New Delhi (718.8 KiB, 5,161 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.05.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Ms. Nutan Thankur vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (729.1 KiB, 5,432 hits)
CIC Decision dated 17.05.2019 on the Second Appeal filed by Gopal Kumar Jha vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Patna (3.2 MiB, 5,602 hits)
CIC Decision dated 29.04.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Manoj Kumar v. CPIO, Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch, Patna (160.6 KiB, 5,753 hits)
CIC Decision dated 26.04.2019 on the Complaint filed by Monish Gulati v. CPIO, Ministry of Civil Aviation, New Delhi (177.6 KiB, 5,721 hits)
CIC Decision dated 25.04.2019 on the Appeal filed by D. Sounderraj v. CPIO, Air India, Air Transport Services Ltd., Mumbai (174.4 KiB, 5,793 hits)
CIC Decision dated 26.03.2019 on the Appeal filed by Nutan Thakur v. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (164.3 KiB, 6,129 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.03.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Ashok Rameshbhai Mistry v. CPIO, Dena Bank, Surat (130.2 KiB, 6,073 hits)
CIC Decision dated 07.03.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Vipin Yadav v. PIO, Office of the Land Acquisition Collector (South-West), GNCTD (484.0 KiB, 6,073 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri R.P. Rohilla v. PIO, Dte. General of Health Services, New Delhi (125.4 KiB, 6,394 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Ms Pushpa Devi v. CPIO, Central Coalfield Limited, Jharkhand (590.4 KiB, 6,308 hits)
CIC Decision dated 12.02.2019 on the Appeal filed by Shri Razaak K. Haider v. CPIO Election Commission of India, New Delhi (666.2 KiB, 6,051 hits)
Delhi HC Judgment dated 16.01.2019 - Ehtisham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO Intelligence Bureau (370.6 KiB, 6,918 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.01.2019 on the Appeal filed by Mr. Kantilal B. Chavda v. CPIO, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat (225.6 KiB, 7,126 hits)
CIC Decision dated 10.01.2019 on the Complaint filed by Shri S.S. Chawla v. Director,CPIO, Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (186.8 KiB, 6,664 hits)
CIC Decision dated 24.12.2018 - Mr. R.S. Rai v. CPIO, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Jabalpur (173.2 KiB, 6,925 hits)
CIC Decision dated 21.12.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sounder Rajan v. CPIO, IDBI Bank Limited, Mumbai (128.8 KiB, 6,795 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.12.2018 - Nirmal Singh Dhiman v. CPIO, Deptt. of Ex-Servicemen, New Delhi (148.8 KiB, 6,850 hits)
CIC Decision dated 08.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. CPIO, Min. of Youth Affairs & Sports, New Delhi (321.5 KiB, 7,636 hits)
CIC Decision dated 02.11.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Sandeep Singh Jadoun v. PIO, DGEAT (523.3 KiB, 7,937 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.09.2018 on the Appeal filed by R.P. Verma Vs. CPIO, Ordnance Factory, Raipur, Dehradun (153.6 KiB, 7,951 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.08.2018 on the Appeal filed by Mr. K.S. Jain Vs. CPIO, Dte. Gen. of Vig., Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi (175.6 KiB, 7,177 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.08.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ms. Rashi Agrawal Vs. CPIO, SPMCIL, New Delhi, CPIO, Indian Security Press, Nashik (165.0 KiB, 6,776 hits)
CIC Decision dated 30.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO, Min. of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi (483.5 KiB, 6,750 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.07.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri S.P. Sinha Vs APIO, Min. of Shipping, MMD, Mumbai (60.6 KiB, 6,900 hits)
CIC Decision dated 04.07.2018 on the Appeal,Complaint filed by Shri Hans Raj Chug Vs. PIO, Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi (288.3 KiB, 6,679 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.06.2018 on the Appeal,Complaint filed by Mr. R. Natarajan Vs. PIO, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (484.7 KiB, 7,011 hits)
CIC Decision dated 25.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Balkrishna Porwal Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (192.5 KiB, 7,182 hits)
CIC Decision dated 25.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ajay Kumar Vs. CPIO, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Lucknow (44.7 KiB, 7,874 hits)
CIC Decision dated 18.06.2018 on the Appeal filed by Shri Neeraj Sharma Vs. CPIO, Rajya Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (55.6 KiB, 7,880 hits)
CIC Decision dated 31.05.2018 on the Appeal filed by Hitender Vs. CPIO, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (58.4 KiB, 7,898 hits)
CIC Decision dated 07.05.2018 on the Appeal/Complaint filed by Mr. M. Dinesh Vs. PIO, Bureau of Immigration,IB (MHA) (362.6 KiB, 6,895 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.07.2017 on the complaint filed by Shri Saurabh Bindal Vs. Delhi Lawn Tennis Association(uploaded on CIC website on 19.04.2018) (12.2 MiB, 8,165 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.04.2018 on the Appeal filed by Ashok Pandit Vs. CPIO, State Bank of India, Maheshkhunt, Khagaria, Bihar (62.4 KiB, 8,410 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.02.2018 on Appeal filed by Soni S. Eramath Vs. CPIO, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi (57.2 KiB, 8,589 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.01.2018 on the Second Appeal,Complaint filed by Shri Rajender Saxena Vs. PIO,EE, Citi Zone, North Delhi Municipal Corporation (161.1 KiB, 9,478 hits)
CIC Decision dated 18.01.2018 on the Complaint filed by A. Gopi Krishna Vs. CPIO, Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, Visakhapatnam (64.4 KiB, 9,352 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on Appeal filed by Madhu Vs. PIO & Sr. DMM, DRM Office, Northern Railway, New Delhi (484.7 KiB, 9,741 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on the Appeal filed by Om Prakash Sharma Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (69.2 KiB, 9,704 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.12.2017 on the Appeal filed by Shri Ajay Kumar, Gurgaon Vs. National Institute of Technology, Patna (32.3 KiB, 9,400 hits)
CIC Decision dated 20.11.2017 on the Complaint filed by Mr. Shailesh Gandhi Vs. The CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office Building, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (697.7 KiB, 9,675 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.11.2017 on the Complaints filed by Shri R.K. Jain and Ms. Ita Bose against Indian Banks Association, Mumbai (1.1 MiB, 9,889 hits)
CIC Decision dated 20.10.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ramraj Sonkar Vs. CPIO, Branch Manager, SBI, Kanpur Nagar (60.5 KiB, 7,513 hits)
CIC Decision dated 17.10.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Yogesh Chandra Vs. CPIO, Office of SE (Elect.). BSNL, New Delhi (59.8 KiB, 7,556 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.10.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Y.N. Prasad Vs. Ahlmad Evening Court (216.2 KiB, 9,409 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.09.2017 on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Shailesh Gandhi, Shri Madhukar Ganpat Kukde and Shri Nimish S. Agarwal Vs. CDR Cell, IDBI Tower, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (16.9 MiB, 7,463 hits)
CIC Decision dated 14.09.2017 on the Appeal filed by Shri R.B. Patil Vs. PIO, Department of Posts (51.8 KiB, 9,849 hits)
CIC Decision dated 04.09.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Shri Ashwani Kumar Avasthi Vs. The CPIO, SBI, Mumbai & Director/GM, IBPS, Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (9.0 MiB, 7,387 hits)
CIC Decision dated 08.08.2017 on the Appeal file by Sh. RK Jain, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (358.6 KiB, 9,548 hits)
CIC Decision dated 28.07.2017 on the Appeal filed by Ms. Krishna Sharma vs. PIO, Department of Posts, Supdt. of Post Offices, Gwalior (67.4 KiB, 9,776 hits)
CIC Decision dated 28.07.2017 on the Appeal filed by Munna Ahmad vs. PIO, Dargah Committee, Ajmer (60.0 KiB, 9,151 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.06.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Nammi Bano Vs. National Commission for Women (136.5 KiB, 9,980 hits)
CIC Decision dated 07.06.2017 on the Appeal filed by Mohd. Amin, J&K Vs. CPIO, TCIL, New Delhi (66.5 KiB, 9,354 hits)
CIC Decision dated 18.05.2017 on the Complaint filed by Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (286.0 KiB, 9,472 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.04.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Mrs. Gunmala Jain, Lalitpur, UP Vs. CPIO, Sr. Supdt., Jhansi, UP (61.2 KiB, 9,630 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.04.2017 on the Second Appeal filed by Sucheta Sureshkumar Vs. PIO, EPFO, Mumbai (61.1 KiB, 10,476 hits)
CIC Decision dated 30.03.2017 on Second Appeal filed by Amrika Bai V. PIO, EPFO, Raipur (84.2 KiB, 10,209 hits)
CIC Decision dated 08.03.2017 on the Appeal filed by Insad, New Delhi, Vs. Dy. P.O., Min. of External Affairs, R.K. Puram, New Delhi (62.8 KiB, 10,073 hits)
CIC Decision dated 09.02.2017 on Appeal filed by Shri Shrigopal Soni Vs. PIO, National Science Centre (51.3 KiB, 11,026 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.02.2017 on Appeal filed by Shri Gopal Rao Gudi Vs.PIO, National Council of Science Museum (58.4 KiB, 11,106 hits)
CIC Decision dated 20.01.2017 on Appeal filed by Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO, Office of the CLC (C), Raipur, Chhattisgarh (56.7 KiB, 6,887 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.01.2017 on Appeal filed by Shri Shanker Goel, New Delhi (39.5 KiB, 6,532 hits)
CIC Decision dated 04.01.2017 on the Appeal filed by Shri Devraj, Distt. Dharwad, Karnataka vs. CPIO, South Western Railway, Bangalore (51.4 KiB, 10,931 hits)
CIC Decision dated 04.01.2017 on the Appeal filed by Mr. Ankur Jindal, Delhi, vs. CPIO, West Central Railway, Kota, Rajasthan (61.9 KiB, 10,209 hits)
CIC Decision dated 29.12.2016 on the Appeal filed by Shri Pradeep B. Sharma, Indore vs. State Bank of India, Jabalpur/Bhopal (36.9 KiB, 10,705 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.12.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Harinder Dhingra Vs. PIO, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (141.4 KiB, 9,974 hits)
CIC Decision dated 05.12.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Prashant Katela Vs. CPIO, Railway Board, New Delhi (51.4 KiB, 10,141 hits)
CIC Decision dated 17.11.2016 on Appeal filed by Mrs. Gayatri Devi, Distt. Patna, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Office of GM, Personnel Branch, Vaishali, Bihar (53.5 KiB, 10,815 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.11.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Hukma Raj Badala, Pali, Rajasthan Vs. CPIO, North Western Railway Division Office, Ajmer (66.3 KiB, 10,385 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.11.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Narayan Prasad, Bikaner, Rajasthan Vs. CPIO, DRM Office, Bikaner, Rajasthan (51.5 KiB, 10,210 hits)
CIC Decision dated 01.11.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Y.K. Mall Vs. PIO, KVS, New Delhi (90.8 KiB, 9,968 hits)
CIC Decision dated 01.09.2016 on Appeal filed by A.B.S.J. Rao (ESM), Kakinada District, AP Vs. CPIO, NCC Group Hq., Kakinad District, A.P. (54.9 KiB, 10,494 hits)
CIC Decision dated 31.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Joginder Singh, Tihar, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendera Place, New Delhi (169.9 KiB, 10,829 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Tolendra Kumar Baghmar, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO, Dena Bank, Raipur (211.0 KiB, 10,730 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.08.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Sham Sundar, Faridkot, Punjab Vs. CPIOs at Mumbai and Chandigarh, NABARD (219.2 KiB, 10,373 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Bhramanand Mishra Vs. PIO, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Lucknow (517.0 KiB, 12,068 hits)
CIC Decision dated 21.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gulab Singh Rana, GM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (805.4 KiB, 13,173 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.07.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Vivek Duggal Vs. CPIO, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board, N. Delhi (Div. Bench Decision) (307.1 KiB, 11,080 hits)
CIC Decision dated 28.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Nanik Premchand Rajwani, Distt. Thane Vs CPIO, Union Bank of India, Mumbai (Division Bench Decision) (335.8 KiB, 11,066 hits)
CIC Decision dated 24.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Ex Nb Sub U.S. Maurya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Records Signals (92.3 KiB, 10,642 hits)
CIC Decision dated 24.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Banarasi Rai, Madya Pradesh Vs. CPIO, CBI, Madhya Pradesh (338.0 KiB, 10,547 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury, Lucknow Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank, New Delhi (211.9 KiB, 8,784 hits)
CIC Decision dated 09.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Arun Kumar Agarwal, Bangalore Vs. Security & Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Mumbai (Full Bench Decision) (171.2 KiB, 9,018 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Ms. Monika Singh Vs. Family Welfare Deptt., Govt. of NCT of Delhi (291.4 KiB, 11,010 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.06.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Onkar Nath, Allahabad Vs. CPIO, Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata (86.3 KiB, 11,325 hits)
CIC Decision dated 26.05.2016 on Appeal/Complaint filed by Shri Gurmeet Singh, Delhi Vs. Safdarjang Hospital & VMMC, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 11,058 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.05.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Gaurav Sethi Vs. University Grants Commission (256.5 KiB, 11,216 hits)
CIC Decision dated 06.05.2016 on Complaint filed by Shri S.C. Agrawal Vs. Constitution Club of India (Full Bench Decision) (252.0 KiB, 10,779 hits)
सीआईसी निर्णय दिनाकित 23.03.2016 - श्री अशोक कुमार, नन्द नगरी, दिल्ली Vs सी जी एच एस, लक्ष्मी नगर, दिल्ली (156.5 KiB, 11,654 hits)
CIC Decision dated 22.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Rameshwar Das Bhankhar Vs. Kendrya Vidyalaya Sansthan, N. Delhi (293.6 KiB, 11,084 hits)
CIC Decision dated 12.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Hemant Dhage Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (656.2 KiB, 11,832 hits)
CIC Decision dated 10.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Nirmal Kanta Vs. Laxmi Bai College, Delhi University (300.9 KiB, 8,122 hits)
CIC Decision dated 08.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Bipin Kumar Vs. Bhakra Beas Management Board, Nangal (213.5 KiB, 9,063 hits)
CIC Decision dated 07.03.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri P. Muruesan, Turicorin Vs. Tuticorin Port Trust (58.4 KiB, 5,717 hits)
CIC Decision dated 24.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri Anil Sood Vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Election), Govt. of NCT of Delhi (368.4 KiB, 11,354 hits)
CIC Decision dated 23.02.2016 on Complaint/Appeal filed by Shri Dinesh Chandra Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 11,220 hits)
CIC Decision dated 08.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Mr. Hemant Kumar Agarwal, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Office, Raigad (55.0 KiB, 11,444 hits)
CIC Decision dated 08.02.2016 on Appeal filed by Shri S. Poovendran, Salem Distt. Vs. CPIO, Southern Railway, Chennai (315.1 KiB, 7,953 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.01.2016 - Abne Ingty vs. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi (809.4 KiB, 11,752 hits)
CIC Decision dated 16.12.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Maniram Sharma, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan Vs. Min. of Communication & IT, NIC, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (534.3 KiB, 11,531 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.12.2015 on Appeal from Smt. Mukesh Devi, Distt. Alwar Vs. CPIO, Office of DG, CISF Camp, New Delhi (296.6 KiB, 11,829 hits)
CIC Decision dated 09.12.2015 on Appeal from Dr. A.L. Agarwal Vs. Delhi University (280.1 KiB, 12,045 hits)
CIC Decision dated 30.11.2015 on Appeal from Dr. D. Dhaya Devadas & Shri V. Sundaram Vs. CPIO, Indian Bureau of Mines, Chennai (Full Bench Decision) (648.9 KiB, 9,929 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.11.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Nirmal Kumar Agarwal, Kheri (UP) Vs. CPIO, Department of Posts, Kheri (48.3 KiB, 9,750 hits)
CIC Decision dated 27.11.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Kunjan Tripathi, Distt. Kanpur (Dehat) Vs. CPIO, Department of Posts, Kanpur (55.2 KiB, 9,855 hits)
CIC Decision dated 09.11.2015 on Appeal from Shri R.K. Jain Vs. Delhi University (250.2 KiB, 9,798 hits)
CIC Decision dated 09.11.2015 on Appeal from Mr. A. Bidyadhar, S.P.M. Sumandala, Ganjam (Odisha) Vs. Department of Posts, Berhampur-760001 (46.1 KiB, 6,208 hits)
CIC Decision dated 21.10.2015 on Appeal from Mr. David George Thomas Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests (264.7 KiB, 9,623 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.10.2015 on Appeal from Shri Durga Prasad Kushwaha, Katni Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jabalpur (84.4 KiB, 10,101 hits)
CIC Decision dated 23.09.2015 on Appeal from Indian Technomac Company Ltd., New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Bank of India, Janpath, New Delhi (402.8 KiB, 9,820 hits)
CIC Decision dated 11.09.2015 on Appeal from Shri Biswamber Nayak Vs. Batra Hospital & Medical Research Centre, New Delhi (519.8 KiB, 9,166 hits)
CIC Decision dated 07.09.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sultan Singh Vs. PIO, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi (473.1 KiB, 9,322 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.08.2015 on Appeal from Shri Sunhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. PIO, Min. of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi (259.0 KiB, 10,353 hits)
CIC Decision dated 10.08.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Chandratan, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Office of Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Surat (89.1 KiB, 10,683 hits)
CIC Decision dated 03.08.2015 - Ms. Poonam Kumari, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commssion, New Delhi (441.6 KiB, 10,047 hits)
CIC Decision dated 15.06.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. CPIO & Dy.DG, Deptt. of Posts, New Delhi (56.6 KiB, 8,422 hits)
CIC Decision dated 03.06.2015 on Appeal filed by Rakhee Marwah Vs. PIO, SDM (Saket), New Delhi (256.3 KiB, 13,495 hits)
CIC Decision dated 29.05.2015 on Appeal filed by Shri H.K. Sehgal Vs. Delhi Jal Board (247.6 KiB, 7,762 hits)
CIC Decision dated 30.04.2015 on Appeal from Surender Vishwakarma Vs. Department of Justice, GOI, New Delhi (248.6 KiB, 13,272 hits)
CIC Decision dated 28.04.2015 on Appeal from Mohit Hasija Vs. PIO, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (253.7 KiB, 836 hits)
CIC Decision dated 13.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Arora Vs. Pusa Polytechnic, Delhi (249.7 KiB, 13,045 hits)
CIC Decision dated 10.04.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Jyoti Jeena Vs. Institue of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi (525.4 KiB, 14,108 hits)
CIC Decision dated 31.03.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shantaram Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai (136.5 KiB, 13,199 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Dharampal, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Gurgaon (44.1 KiB, 12,993 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Ram Kumar, Jaipur Vs. Controller of Communication Acts, Deptt. of Telecommunications, Shimla (44.9 KiB, 13,115 hits)
CIC Decision dated 04.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Jitendra Anandrao Chauhan, Kolhapur Central Prison Vs. Department of Posts, New Delhi (47.6 KiB, 12,676 hits)
CIC Decision dated 03.03.2015 on Appeal from Mr. Baladevan Rangaraju Vs. PIO, Delhi Commission for Women, GNCTD, New Delhi (212.9 KiB, 14,554 hits)
Decision dated 02.03.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Amal Kumar Bhattacharya, Vadodara Vs. Medical Council of India, New Delhi (53.5 KiB, 14,728 hits)
Decision dated 26.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Anbuvendhan, Chennai Vs. the CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi (128.6 KiB, 14,473 hits)
CIC Decision dated 20.02.2015 on Appeal from Suresh Chander Gupta Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (491.9 KiB, 13,276 hits)
Decision dated 18.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri Shyam Mohan Parashar, Faridabad Vs. Dte. of Training and Technical Education, Delhi (258.2 KiB, 14,507 hits)
Decision dated 05.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Pradeep Sharma Vs. Social Welfare Officer (respondent) (350.5 KiB, 14,603 hits)
Decision dated 03.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (253.0 KiB, 14,615 hits)
Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Complaint from Shri Roshan Lal Vs. Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare, GNCTD, Delhi (352.1 KiB, 12,361 hits)
Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Shri SKT Sherman Vs. RCS, GNCTD, New Delhi (352.4 KiB, 14,879 hits)
Decision dated 02.02.2015 on Appeal from Dr. Satya Prakash, Delhi Vs. Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 14,697 hits)
Decision dated 30.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri N.B. Deshmukh, Thane Vs. CPIO Air India Ltd., Mumbai (42.1 KiB, 14,593 hits)
Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Harsh Vardhan Nayyar, New Delhi Vs. NDMC, New Delhi (54.2 KiB, 14,623 hits)
Decision dated 27.01.2015 on Appeal from Mr. M. Mahadevappa Vs. CPIO & DGM (HR/Admn.), BSNL, Mysore (52.6 KiB, 11,500 hits)
Decision dated 21.01.2015 on Appeal from Ms. Harpreet Kaur Vs. Delhi Subordinate Selection Board, Delhi (454.9 KiB, 14,991 hits)
Decision dated 16.01.2015 on Appeal from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Department for the Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, GNCTD, Delhi (469.0 KiB, 13,125 hits)
Decision dated 15.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Gurmeet Singh, Kanpur Vs. CGHS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (122.8 KiB, 790 hits)
Decision dated 14.01.2015 on Complaint from Sh. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. National Green Tribunal (365.9 KiB, 14,613 hits)
Decision dated 08.01.2015 on Complaint from Ms. Sakshi Jain Vs. GGS Indraprastha University, Delhi (351.0 KiB, 12,953 hits)
Decision dated 07.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri S.N. Shukla, Lucknow Vs. Department of Justice, Govt. of India, New Delhi (474.1 KiB, 14,665 hits)
Decision dated 02.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal Vs. PIO, Dy. Land & Development Officer, Min. of Urban Development, New Delhi (45.4 KiB, 730 hits)
Decision dated 01.01.2015 on Appeal from Shri Rohit Sabharwal, President, Coucil of RTI Activists, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO, DGM, BSNL, Ludhiana (73.9 KiB, 1,007 hits)
Decision dated 31.12.2014 on complaint from Shri Ashutosh Nagar Vs. National Green Tribunal (474.6 KiB, 1,154 hits)
Decision dated 19.12.2014 - Shri Jai Prakash Deep Vs. CPIO, India Oil Corporation Ltd., Bhopal (331.9 KiB, 930 hits)
Decision dated 17.12.2014 - Mr. Francis Assis Fernandes, Indore Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Ujjain (52.4 KiB, 14,822 hits)
Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Dte. of Education Hqrs., GNCTD, Delhi (351.1 KiB, 794 hits)
Decision dated 12.12.2014 - Shri O.P. Nahar Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (352.7 KiB, 879 hits)
Decision dated 11.12.2014 - Shri Satinder Nath Sood Vs. CPIO, United Bank of India Regional Office, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 794 hits)
Decision dated 11.12.2014 - Shri Ashwini Vs. DTC, New Delhi (252.0 KiB, 854 hits)
Decision dated 01.12.2014 - Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Education Deptt., GNCTD, Delhi (258.6 KiB, 14,505 hits)
Decision dated 26.11.2014 - Shri Rohit Sabharwal Vs. Delhi Fire Service, GNCTD, Delhi (334.1 KiB, 970 hits)
Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Shri V.K. Jha Vs. Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (317.5 KiB, 1,041 hits)
Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (265.2 KiB, 14,488 hits)
Decision dated 25.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (271.0 KiB, 998 hits)
Decision dated 12.11.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi (433.5 KiB, 9,123 hits)
Decision dated 05.11.2014 - Sardar Ranjit Singh, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (309.5 KiB, 773 hits)
Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Shri Chander Prakash Vs. AGM (HR), DGM (HR) & Ors., Airport Authority of India, Delhi (80.2 KiB, 1,096 hits)
Decision dated 03.11.2014 - Mr. Inala Satyanarayana Murthy, Machilipatnam, A.P. Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Machilipatnam (50.8 KiB, 858 hits)
Decision dated 22.10.2014 - Shri Prem Raj Vs. Delhi Jal Board, GNCTD (310.6 KiB, 930 hits)
Decision dated 17.10.2014 - Shri M.K. Gupta, Delhi Vs. PIO, Jt. Dir. (Gr.Cell), CGHS, New Delhi (44.9 KiB, 833 hits)
Decision dated 10.10.2014 - Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Jal Board (208.1 KiB, 14,450 hits)
Decision dated 16.09.2014 - Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Delhi & Distt. Cricket Association, Land & Development Officer, Min. of UD, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (86.4 KiB, 649 hits)
Decision dated 20.08.2014 - Dr. Srinivas Vyas Vs. Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbia College & Hospital, GNCTD, New Delhi (387.7 KiB, 14,710 hits)
Decision dated 17.07.2014 - Shri Ashutosh Pandey, Bhopal Vs. UPSC, New Delhi (74.4 KiB, 603 hits)
Decision dated 17.07.2014 - Shri Sudhir Goyal, Dehradun Vs. PMO, New Delhi (129.0 KiB, 827 hits)
Decision dated 25.06.2014 - Mr. R.C. Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, GNCTD, Delhi (450.2 KiB, 13,027 hits)
CIC Decision dated 19.06.2014 on the Appeal filed by Lt. Gen. S.S. Dahiya Vs. CPIO, Appellate Authority, Air Hqrs., New Delhi (233.9 KiB, 8,072 hits)
Decision dated 09.06.2014 - Smt. Walia Nasreen, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi (295.2 KiB, 720 hits)
Decision dated 05.06.2014 - Mr. S.P. Dogra, Ambala Cantt. Vs. CPIO & Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices, Deptt. of Posts, Ambala (67.5 KiB, 818 hits)
Decision dated 23.05.2014 - Ms. Meenu Kumari Vs. Delhi State Service Selection Board, Delhi (256.9 KiB, 834 hits)
Decision dated 21.05.2014 - Mr. Patel Shankarlal Ambalal Vs. CPIO & Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhara (63.0 KiB, 8,331 hits)
Decision dated 15.05.2014 - Shri K.P. Singh Vs. U.P.S.C., New Delhi (199.4 KiB, 844 hits)
Decision dated 15.05.2014 - Shri Hardeep Singh Sawhney Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi (198.6 KiB, 8,049 hits)
Decision dated 15.05.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Khabya, Bhopal Vs. DCIT, Bhopal (13.4 KiB, 960 hits)
Decision dated 12.05.2014 - Mr. Patel Hasmukhbai Maganbhai, Godhdra Vs. Supdt. of Post Offices, Godhra (64.5 KiB, 752 hits)
Decision dated 05.05.2014 - Ch. Rama Krishna Rao Vs. Naval Shipyard, Port Blair (Full Bench Decision) (223.9 KiB, 1,349 hits)
Decision dated 02.05.2014 - Shri Gaikwad Shahurao Vishwanthrao, Parbhani, Maharashtra Vs. CPIO, Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Nanded, Maharashtra (210.2 KiB, 891 hits)
Decision dated 24.04.2014 - Shri Dipak J. Gandhi Vs. Supreme Court (52.2 KiB, 8,196 hits)
Decision dated 24.04.2014 - Shri Rakesh Gupta Vs. Kendriya Bhandar (216.9 KiB, 932 hits)
Decision dated 17.04.2014 - Ramesh Kumar Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Delhi (214.0 KiB, 865 hits)
Decision dated 16.04.2014 - Mrs. Usha Devi, Gandhinagar, Jammu Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Posts, Office of PMG, Jammu (50.6 KiB, 911 hits)
Decision dated 03.04.2014 - Sh. Arun Kumar Sinha, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, National Library, Govt. of India, Kolkata (310.4 KiB, 1,129 hits)
Decision dated 03.04.2014 - Mr. S. Dhanabalan, Veppur, Perambalur District Vs. CPIO, Office of Postmaster General, Tiruchirapalli (47.9 KiB, 730 hits)
Decision dated 12.03.2014 - Shri Omprakash Kashiram Vs. Prime Minister's Office (209.9 KiB, 991 hits)
Decision dated 12.03.2014 - Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Rohini, Delhi-85 (13.4 KiB, 1,024 hits)
Decision dated 10.03.2014 - Mr. R.K. Jain Vs. U.P.S.C. (69.6 KiB, 811 hits)
Decision dated 10.03.2014 - Mr. Rajan Saluja Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (59.5 KiB, 1,082 hits)
Decision dated 19.02.2014 - Mr. Anand Mohan Vs. Deptt. of Admn. Reforms & PG Grievances (64.1 KiB, 804 hits)
Decision dated 18.02.2014 - Pramod Ganpat Sawant Vs. DOP&T, New Delhi (395.6 KiB, 1,058 hits)
Decision dated 13.02.2014 - R.K. Prasad Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (317.1 KiB, 926 hits)
Decision dated 11.02.2014 - Mr. Ajay Kumar Vs. Central Excise, Guwahati (70.1 KiB, 968 hits)
Decision dated 29.01.2014 - Shri Bhagwan Chand Saxena Vs. Export Inspection Council of India (213.0 KiB, 936 hits)
Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Shri Girish Nautiyal Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., NOIDA (200.5 KiB, 1,277 hits)
Decision dated 27.01.2014 - Mr. Kaushal Vs. Delhi Police, East District (71.0 KiB, 1,257 hits)
Decision dated 16.01.2014 - Ms. Surekha K.J., Kolkata Vs. Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (240.6 KiB, 899 hits)
Decision dated 09.01.2014 - Smt. Geeta Ghai, Delhi Vs. Dte. General of Lighthouses & Lightships, NOIDA (197.5 KiB, 939 hits)
Decision dated 07.01.2014 - Ms. Jyoti Seherawat Vs. Home (General) Department, Govt. of Delhi (322.2 KiB, 9,178 hits)
Decision dated 07.01.2014 - Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Coal (106.9 KiB, 2,541 hits)
Decision dated 24.12.2013 - First Appellate Authority (RTI), PAO (Ors), BEG, Roorkee, Uttarakhand (103.9 KiB, 5,672 hits)
Decision dated 23.12.2013 - Shri D. Selvaraj, Namakkal Vs. Income Tax Officer & DIT, Chennai (241.8 KiB, 664 hits)
Decision dated 03.12.2013 - Shri Rajiv Kapur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District, Delhi (213.5 KiB, 1,081 hits)
Decision dated 22.11.2013 - Shri Rambir Singh, New Delhi Vs. Office of Additional District Magisrate, GNCT, New Delhi (93.8 KiB, 772 hits)
Decision dated 15.11.2013 - Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi Vs. Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi (98.7 KiB, 1,045 hits)
Decision dated 15.11.2013 - Harkrishan Das Nijhawan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (96.5 KiB, 942 hits)
Decision dated 13.11.2013 - Shri Hariprasad Moon Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai (96.3 KiB, 899 hits)
Decision dated 13.11.2013 - Shri Chandran Nair, Ahmedabad Vs. DCIT (Vig.) & Addl. CIT, Ahmedabad (242.9 KiB, 958 hits)
Decision dated 11.11.2013 - Dr. Rajiv Bhandari, Panchkula Vs. Office of the Director of Higher Education, UT, Chandigarh (93.4 KiB, 771 hits)
Decision dated 07.11.2013 - Smt. Tapati Bhattacharjee Vs. Office of Dy. Conservator of Forests, Port Blair (95.2 KiB, 800 hits)
Decision dated 23.10.2013 - Shri V.K. Pandey, Kolkata Vs. LIC of India, Kolkata (91.7 KiB, 1,081 hits)
Decision dated 15.10.2013 - Shri Deepak Khullar, New Delhi Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (91.3 KiB, 729 hits)
Decision dated 14.10.2013 - Shri Rakesh Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. Transport Department (GNCT), Delhi (305.7 KiB, 6,524 hits)
Decision dated 08.10.2013 - Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (95.7 KiB, 921 hits)
Decision dated 27.09.2013 - Dr. Bijaya Kumar Samantaray Vs. Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata (202.9 KiB, 1,238 hits)
Decision dated 26.09.2013 - Shri Amit Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs & Bureau of Immigration, IB (242.7 KiB, 1,214 hits)
Decision dated 17.09.2013 - Shri Amanullah Khan, Pune Vs. Tax Recovery Officer & AO, Pune (240.1 KiB, 1,699 hits)
Decision dated 04.09.2013 - Shri Paras Nath Singh Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (217.6 KiB, 1,166 hits)
Decision dated 27.08.2013 - Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (Full Bench Decision) (63.1 KiB, 1,618 hits)
Decision dated 26.08.2013 - Dr. P.K. Srivastava, Distt. Una, H.P. Vs. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (209.6 KiB, 1,119 hits)
Decision dated 26.08.2013 - Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur (UP) Vs. US, Staff Selection Committee, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 1,004 hits)
Decision dated 14.08.2013 - Shri K. Madhavan, Chennai Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (205.9 KiB, 1,002 hits)
Decision dated 12.08.2013 - Shri M.Yogeshwar Raj Vs. Air India (211.1 KiB, 875 hits)
Decision dated 07.08.2013 - Shri Balbeer Krishan Arora, Farukhabad Vs. CPIO, Office of AG-I, Uttar Pradesh (207.8 KiB, 757 hits)
Decision dated 05.08.2013 - Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) (403.9 KiB, 2,134 hits)
Decision dated 05.08.2013 - Shri S. Joseph Balasundar, Chennai Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (210.6 KiB, 1,085 hits)
Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Dr. K. Padma Priya, Asstt. Professor, JNTU College of Engg., Pulivendula, A.P. Vs. FAA, AICTE, New Delhi (104.6 KiB, 903 hits)
Decision dated 02.08.2013 - Shri Amit Agarwal, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 25(1), Range 37, New Delhi (85.1 KiB, 1,156 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2013 - Shri S.S. Upathyaya, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, The Ahoka Hotel, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi (211.5 KiB, 740 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2013 - Shri Kuldeep Yadav, Beri, Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana Vs. CPIO, Institute of Hotel Management, Pusa, New Delhi (208.1 KiB, 741 hits)
Decision dated 24.07.2013 - Shri S.A.A. Abbasi, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 713 hits)
Decision dated 24.07.2013 - Shri Ashish Ranjan, Delhi Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (210.9 KiB, 923 hits)
Decision dated 22.07.2013 - Shri Vishwas Bharmburkar, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi (208.8 KiB, 955 hits)
Decision dated 19.07.2013 - Shri L.V. Raju Vs. Northern Coalfields Ltd. (215.4 KiB, 795 hits)
Decision dated 18.07.2013 - Shri Ashok Kumar Joshi Vs. ITI Ltd., Gonda (201.7 KiB, 780 hits)
Decision dated 17.07.2013 - Dr. S. Chellappa, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, CBI, Hyderabad (209.9 KiB, 833 hits)
Decision dated 11.07.2013 - Shri Ram Manohar Vs. Delhi Police (204.4 KiB, 1,030 hits)
Decision dated 10.07.2013 - Mr. Perarivalan Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (87.2 KiB, 1,876 hits)
Decision dated 08.07.2013 - Shri Amarjit Sen, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (209.9 KiB, 728 hits)
Decision dated 08.07.2013 - Dr. Jitendra Nath Gupta, Delhi Vs. Coordinating Officer, Monitoring Committee, Supreme Court, New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 808 hits)
Decision dated 05.07.2013 - Shri B.Bharathi, Puducherry Vs. PIO, Madras High Court, Chennai (306.4 KiB, 1,041 hits)
Decision dated 05.07.2013 - Shri Jayant Rakshit, Kolkata Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata (207.3 KiB, 844 hits)
Decision dated 04.07.2013 - Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 2,004 hits)
Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Manoj Arya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (211.0 KiB, 1,035 hits)
Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Rednam Deepak, Visakhapatnam Vs. CPIO, Cabinet Sectt., New Delhi (212.1 KiB, 996 hits)
Decision dated 26.06.2013 - Shri Satya Prakash Mishra, Lucknow Vs. CPIO, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow (207.2 KiB, 728 hits)
Decision dated 14.06.2013 - Shri Shyam Sunder Singh Vs. National Human Rights Commission (198.7 KiB, 1,128 hits)
Decision dated 14.06.2013 - Shri V.N. Mathur Vs. Delhi Police, South East District (213.0 KiB, 914 hits)
Decision dated 13.06.2013 - Shri Kamal Sharma, Agra Vs. ACIT, Kanpur (64.6 KiB, 933 hits)
Decision dated 03.06.2013 - Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 2,159 hits)
Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Shri Pradip Shankar Choughule Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (221.5 KiB, 928 hits)
Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Shri Sanjay Badekar, Mumbai Vs. LIC of India, Mumbai (91.3 KiB, 832 hits)
Decision dated 29.05.2013 - Mr. M. Vellaipandi, STQC IT Centre, Chennai Vs. CPOI & Director, STQC Dte. under Min. of Comm. & IT, New Delhi (53.8 KiB, 914 hits)
Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) (108.3 KiB, 860 hits)
Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (52.3 KiB, 778 hits)
Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Bhanu Pratap, Moradabad Vs. US & CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 866 hits)
Decision dated 10.05.2013 - Ms. Medha Rani, Chandigarh Vs. CPI, CBI, Chandigarh (208.2 KiB, 933 hits)
Decision dated 09.05.2013 - Shri J.S. Singhal, ASW(E), AIR, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Prasar Bharati, New Delhi (207.6 KiB, 666 hits)
Decision dated 08.05.2013 - Shri S. Kumar Minz, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, All India Radio, Patna (210.0 KiB, 969 hits)
Decision dated 07.05.2013 - Shri P.S. Jadon, Lok Vihar Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 921 hits)
Decision dated 07.05.2013 - Shri Natraj Saha, Birbhum Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.1 KiB, 666 hits)
Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Distt. Sultanpur, UP Vs. CPIO, SSC, Allahabad (304.1 KiB, 863 hits)
Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Saurabh Pandey, Chapra, Saran Bihar Vs. US, SSC, New Delhi (210.7 KiB, 942 hits)
Decision dated 01.05.2013 - Shri Ajit Kumar, Patna Vs. Dy. Director, SSC, Allahabad (213.1 KiB, 867 hits)
Decision dated 29.04.2013 - Shri Nitesh Kumar Tripathy, JNU, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, President' Sectt., New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 926 hits)
Decision dated 26.04.2013 - Shri Jagjit Singh, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (212.2 KiB, 929 hits)
Decision dated 12.04.2013 - Shri Rednam Deepak Vs. Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 905 hits)
Decision dated 12.04.2013 - Shri Harishankar Tiwari Vs. Minsitry of Law & Justice, New Delhi (194.1 KiB, 1,003 hits)
Decision dated 11.04.2013 - Shri R.P. Pandeya, New Delhi Vs. CBDT, New Delhi (68.5 KiB, 885 hits)
Decision dated 21.03.2013 - Shri R. Govindarajan, Tirrupur Vs. CPIO, CVC, New Delhi (210.2 KiB, 983 hits)
Decision dated 21.03.2013 - Shri R.A. Gupta, Sr. Manager, Bank of Baroda (208.4 KiB, 994 hits)
Decision dated 15.03.2013 - Shri Ravinder Singh Negi Vs. New India Assurance Co. (90.4 KiB, 1,056 hits)
Decision dated 20.02.2013 - Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (123.9 KiB, 1,085 hits)
Decision dated 19.02.2013 - Shri Rishipal Singh, Distt. Haridwar, Uttarakhand vs. ITO(Inv.)(HQ) & Addl. Director of IT (Inv.), Lucknow (74.3 KiB, 642 hits)
Decision dated 19.02.2013 - Shri Rishipal Singh, Distt. Haridwar, Uttarakhand vs. ITO(Inv.)(HQ) & Addl. Director of IT (Inv.), Lucknow (74.3 KiB, 777 hits)
Decision dated 15.02.2013 - Shri Ajay Pal, Bawal, Rewari, Haryana Vs. Under Secretary, SSC, New Delhi (303.8 KiB, 766 hits)
Decision dated 15.02.2013 - Shri Ajay Kumar Sharma, Indira Enclave, P.O. Mehubala, Dehradun Vs. CPIO, Office of the Principal AG (Audit), Uttarakhand, Dehradun (207.1 KiB, 778 hits)
Decision dated 10.10.2012 - Shri Manish Kumar, Varanasi Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (87.4 KiB, 807 hits)
Decision dated 09.10.2012 - Shri Shankar Chandra Das Gupta, Kolkata Vs. IRDA, Hyderabad (443.5 KiB, 998 hits)
Decision dated 08.10.2012 - Shri Madhav B. Karmakar Vs. Deptt. of Financial Services, New Delhi (87.7 KiB, 843 hits)
Decision dated 05.10.2012 - Shri Partha Mandal, Delhi Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (209.0 KiB, 800 hits)
Decision dated 28.09.2012 - Shri Shiv Shankar Tiwari, Faridabad Vs. DOPT, New Delhi (331.0 KiB, 859 hits)
Decision dated 14.09.2012 - Shri Mohinder Singh Sidhu Vs. Dte. Gen. of Vigilance, Customs & Excise, New Delhi (195.6 KiB, 981 hits)
Decision dated 12.09.2012 - Shri M. Shiva Shankar, Hyderabad Vs. LIC of India, Hyderabad (86.9 KiB, 779 hits)
Decision dated 12.09.2012 - Shri Sunil Kumar, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 714 hits)
Decision dated 31.08.2012 - Shri Ram Naresh Vs. Ministry of Law & Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (195.3 KiB, 892 hits)
Decision dated 31.08.2012 - Shri Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO, Deptt. of Personnel & Training, New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 1,008 hits)
Decision dated 31.08.2012 - Shri Ravi Malpani, Ratlam, M.P. Vs. SSC, New Delhi (204.9 KiB, 873 hits)
Decision dated 21.08.2012 - Shri B.D. Gupta Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (239.6 KiB, 808 hits)
Decision dated 21.08.2012 - Shri Harendra Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, SSC, New Delhi (208.5 KiB, 770 hits)
Decision dated 14.08.2012 - Shri Syed Idramudin, Nizamabad Vs. Appellate Authority, Regional Passport Office, Secunderabad (331.0 KiB, 919 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri Prakash Singh, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI (ACB), New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 987 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri K. Thankshinamurthy, Madurai Vs. CPIO, CBI, Chennai (206.7 KiB, 1,065 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri Jagdish Prasad, Ranchi Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (204.8 KiB, 969 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Shri K. Nagraj, IPS, Tripura Vs. CPIO, New Delhi (209.3 KiB, 724 hits)
Decision dated 31.07.2012 - Ms. Manju, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (207.4 KiB, 893 hits)
Decision dated 30.07.2012 - Shri Manish Kumar Singh, Ghaziabad Vs. CPIO, UPSC, New Delhi (306.3 KiB, 757 hits)
Decision dated 30.07.2012 - Shri U.N.L. Das, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (206.1 KiB, 845 hits)
Decision dated 06.07.2012 - Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Chhota Udepur, Distt. Vadodara Vs. PIO&CGM, RBI, Mumbai (95.6 KiB, 1,718 hits)
Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Mr. Sanjay Mukund Thatte, Jalgaon Vs. CPIO, Allahabad Bank, Mumbai (52.2 KiB, 1,099 hits)
Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Mr. A.K. Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. CPIO & Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (62.9 KiB, 1,062 hits)
Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Dr. Kamal Saini Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (195.8 KiB, 713 hits)
Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Shri J.K. Sharma Vs. Delhi Police (199.5 KiB, 792 hits)
Decision dated 15.06.2012 - Shri Gyanendra Vs. Delhi Police (195.6 KiB, 1,010 hits)
Decision dated 01.06.2012 - Mr. Vipan Kumar Gupta, Ludhiana Vs. CPIO & DGM, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Lucknow (58.0 KiB, 1,110 hits)
Decision dated 01.06.2012 - Mr. S. Kandasamy, Manager, Pallavan Grama Bank, Irudhukottai, Tamilnadu Vs. PIO & GM, Pallavan Grama Bank, Salem, Tamilnadu (62.5 KiB, 941 hits)
Decision dated 30.05.2012 - Mr. Tek Chand Kotwal, Rohini, Delhi Vs. PIO & RPO, Regional Passport Office, New Delhi (51.4 KiB, 713 hits)
Decision dated 28.05.2012 - Shri Narinder Jain Vs. Delhi, EOW, Crime Branch (194.4 KiB, 1,051 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Mrs. Shakuntala Jayant, Pandav Nagar, Delhi Vs. PIO, MCD, New Delhi (51.5 KiB, 912 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Mr. Ramesh Sawant, Mumbai Vs. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai (89.8 KiB, 775 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Mr. Dinbandhu Sarkar, National Library, Kolkata Vs. National Library, Kolkata (76.6 KiB, 814 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. PIO & US, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (57.7 KiB, 743 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Mr. Amardeep Gulati, Shahdara, Delhi Vs. PIO, AIIMS, New Delhi (53.0 KiB, 709 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Shri Nitin Nayyar, Mohali Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (209.7 KiB, 847 hits)
Decision dated 24.05.2012 - Shri D.P. Ojha, DGP (Retd.), Patna Vs. CPIO, CBI, Ranchi (207.6 KiB, 1,014 hits)
Decision dated 15.05.2012 - Shri Vijay Gupta Vs. Delhi Police (216.0 KiB, 1,251 hits)
Decision dated 30.04.2012 - Mr. Hassan Singh Mejie, Chandigarh Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (52.4 KiB, 839 hits)
Decision dated 30.04.2012 - Ms. Sumaira Abdulali Vs. PIO & Addl. Director, Min. of Environment & Forests, New Delhi (63.7 KiB, 1,047 hits)
Decision dated 04.04.2012 - Shri Prafulla Jojo Vs. Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi (194.3 KiB, 1,289 hits)
Decision dated 03.04.2012 - Shri Ram M. Apte, Balgaum Vs. CPIO, High Court of Karnakatak, Bangaluru (204.9 KiB, 1,155 hits)
Decision dated 03.04.2012 - Shri Bindeshwar Shah, Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad (207.2 KiB, 875 hits)
Decision dated 09.03.2012 - Shri Abhi Ghosh, Kolkata Vs. Air India Ltd., New Delhi (207.7 KiB, 969 hits)
Decision dated 09.03.2012 - Shri Ankur Mutreja, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Census Operations, New Delhi (213.3 KiB, 826 hits)
Decision dated 07.03.2012 - Shri Kamaldev Thakur, East Champaran, Bihar Vs. Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Motihari, Bihar (297.8 KiB, 803 hits)
Decision dated 06.03.2012 - Shri N. Srinivas, Hyderabad Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, Chennai (298.2 KiB, 880 hits)
Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri Gopal Singh, Distt. Sitamarhi, Bihar Vs. CPIO, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur (304.9 KiB, 926 hits)
Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri Manoranjan S. Roy, Mumbai Vs CPIO, Mumbai DRT No.2, Mumbai (302.0 KiB, 877 hits)
Decision dated 22.02.2012 - Shri S.P. Goyal Vs. Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai (195.4 KiB, 1,077 hits)
Decision dated 21.02.2012 - Dr. Gyan Prakash Mishra, Distt. Balia, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court, UP (303.3 KiB, 961 hits)
Decision dated 21.02.2012 - Shri R.D. Batra, Secy. Citizen Rights Association II, Ghaziabad, UP Vs. CPIO, Allahabad High Court Court, UP (205.1 KiB, 890 hits)
Decision dated 21.02.2012 - Shri Arup K. Ghosh Vs. Mumbai Port Trust, Mumbai (237.6 KiB, 970 hits)
Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, Srinagar Vs. PIO & Program Executive, Prasar Bharti, Srinagar (48.2 KiB, 802 hits)
Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Shri Radhakrishnan B. Toshawara Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Surat-II (179.4 KiB, 854 hits)
Decision dated 07.02.2012 - Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Office of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (187.1 KiB, 1,012 hits)
Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Vinod K. Jose, New Delhi Vs. PIO & DS, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, New Delhi (79.4 KiB, 1,268 hits)
Decision dated 30.01.2012 - Mr. Akshay Pant, Port Blair Vs. PIO, A&N Administration, Port Blair (60.6 KiB, 1,028 hits)
Decision dated 19.01.2012 - Mr. Tarun Nag, Kolkata Vs. PIO, Central Drugs Laboratory, Kolkata (56.4 KiB, 1,073 hits)
Decision dated 19.01.2012 - Mr. A.L. Makhijani, President, Forum for Good Governance, Delhi Vs. CMO, CGHS, New Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi (47.3 KiB, 1,004 hits)
Decision dated 12.01.2012 - Shri J.C. Kataria & Shri Mani Ram Sharma Vs. High Courts of AP, Gauhati, Gujarat, HP, Jharkhand, Rajasthan & other High Courts (427.5 KiB, 1,003 hits)
Decision dated 12.01.2012 - Shri D.K. Aggarwal, Moradabad Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (55.1 KiB, 836 hits)
Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. S.D. Shastri, Jaipur Vs. PIO, Ministry of I&B, New Delhi (36.2 KiB, 926 hits)
Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. K. Karthirmathiyon, Secy., Coimbatore Consumer Cause, Coimbatore Vs. PIO & JS, Medical Council of India, New Delhi (44.4 KiB, 1,082 hits)
Decision dated 29.12.2011 - Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi Vs. PIO & Director (RTI), Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (53.4 KiB, 1,013 hits)
Decision dated 23.12.2011 - Mr. S.P. Goyal, Mumbai Vs. PIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai (49.1 KiB, 897 hits)
Decision dated 23.12.2011 - Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Amritsar Vs. PIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, Amritsar (57.3 KiB, 1,002 hits)
Decision dated 23.12.2011 - Mr. R.C. Gupta, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi Vs. PIO & HOD, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi (48.3 KiB, 870 hits)
Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank HO, Manipal (49.9 KiB, 986 hits)
Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Smt. Jaylakshmi, Hubli Vs. PIO & DGM, Corporation Bank HO, Mangalore (49.5 KiB, 1,155 hits)
Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Mr. Lakhpat Tanwar, Lab Oncology Unit, AIIMS, New Delhi Vs. PIO & AO, AIIMS, New Delhi (55.4 KiB, 762 hits)
Decision dated 16.12.2011 - Mr. Sukhjit Singh Walia, Patiala Vs. PIO & Dir. (RTI), Min. of External Affairs, New Delhi (47.5 KiB, 991 hits)
Decision dated 30.11.2011 - Shri Murlidhar, Patna Vs. CPIO, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (286.2 KiB, 919 hits)
Decision dated 30.11.2011 on Appeal from Shri Sarpal Singh Vs. National Commission for Cement & Building Materials, Ballabhgarh (192.4 KiB, 1,289 hits)
Decision dated 28.11.2011 - Mr. Dharamveer Singh, New India Assurance, Aligarh Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (140.0 KiB, 929 hits)
Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. Asstt. IG, Min. of Environment & Forest, New Delhi (90.6 KiB, 939 hits)
Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Sanat Kumar, Vill.+Post Kerma, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar Vs. PIO, United Bank of India, Kolkata (63.3 KiB, 1,049 hits)
Decision dated 24.11.2011 - Mr. Ramesh Kumar Anand, Steno., PGIMER, Chandigarh Vs. CPIO, PGIMER, Chandigarh (44.6 KiB, 1,222 hits)
Decision dated 11.11.2011 - Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & GM, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai (70.2 KiB, 849 hits)
Decision dated 09.11.2011 - Mr. Adishwar Jain Vs. Office of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (223.8 KiB, 787 hits)
Decision dated 09.11.2011 - Mr. K.R. Basu, Tirunelveli-7 Vs. PIO & CGM, Indian Bank, Chennai (52.7 KiB, 1,062 hits)
Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mrs. Ambika Sudhakaran, Palakkad, Kerala Vs. PIO, Bank of India, New Delhi (35.5 KiB, 821 hits)
Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. Nemi Chand Jain, Jaipur Vs. PIO & DGM, United Bank of India, Guwahati (37.8 KiB, 935 hits)
Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. D.S. Jolly, Motia Khan, New Delhi Vs. PIO & Chief Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (59.1 KiB, 1,092 hits)
Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Delhi Vs. PIO & AGM, Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal, Karnataka (62.0 KiB, 1,181 hits)
Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. G.B. Chandulal, Rajkot Vs. PIO & GM, Dena Bank, Mumbai (39.3 KiB, 1,021 hits)
Decision dated 04.11.2011 - Mr. V.M. Shirvalkar, Thane Vs. PIO, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai (96.5 KiB, 1,195 hits)
Decision dated 03.11.2011 - Shri S. Mukherjee Vs. Eastern Coalfields, Dhanbad (455.6 KiB, 792 hits)
Decision dated 02.11.2011 - Shri Suraj Prakash Bakshi, Delhi Vs. Public Grievances Commission, New Delhi (207.0 KiB, 661 hits)
Decision dated 02.11.2011 - Shri Ved Prakash Singhal, Nangloi Vs. Office of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (207.3 KiB, 959 hits)
Decision dated 31.10.2011 - Mr. T. Arumugam, Alwarpet, Chennai Vs. PIO, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, RRIUM, Chennai (48.5 KiB, 982 hits)
Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi Vs. CPIO & Asstt. Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi (48.8 KiB, 1,196 hits)
Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Capt. P.K. Anchal, Bhiwani Vs. CPIO & Chief Manager, Dena Bank, Panchkula (65.4 KiB, 1,199 hits)
Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Mr. Ashokumar M Pandya, Ahmedabad Vs. PIO & Dy. General Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad (55.4 KiB, 1,124 hits)
Decision dated 21.10.2011 on Appeal from Ms. Bimla Prakash, Delhi Vs. CPIO & DGM, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai (59.6 KiB, 1,257 hits)
Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Sh. D.K. Pandey, Jamshedpur Vs. PIO, Passport Office, Ranchi (62.6 KiB, 1,037 hits)
Decision dated 21.10.2011 - Sh. D.K. Bindra, New Delhi Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi (13.4 KiB, 843 hits)
Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. Ashwini Kumar Avasthi, Aligarh Vs. PIO & DGM, Vijay Bank, Bangaluru (57.6 KiB, 1,264 hits)
Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. K.G. Krishnamoorthy, Mayiladuthari Vs. PIO, Indian Bank, Chennai (55.4 KiB, 834 hits)
Decision dated 12.10.2011 - Mr. Veer Sain, Jaipur Vs. CPIO & General Manager, RBI, Mumbai (71.8 KiB, 1,051 hits)
Decision dated 10.10.2011 - Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) Vs. Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Full Bench Decision) (70.8 KiB, 894 hits)
Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. L.S.R. Murthy, Hyderabad Vs. PIO&AGM, UCO Bank, Hyderabad (47.1 KiB, 995 hits)
Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Chandrakant C. Anandpara, Chairman, Consumer Care Forum, Mumbai Vs. PIO, Bank of India, Walkeshwar Branch, Mumbai (48.1 KiB, 875 hits)
Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Santosh Yadav, NOIDA Vs. Director & FAA, Min. of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi (37.8 KiB, 1,024 hits)
Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Gupta, Unnao, UP Vs. PIO & US, Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi (163.2 KiB, 1,094 hits)
Decision dated 05.10.2011 - Mr. Harinder Dhingra, Gurgaon Vs. CPIO & US and Secretary, Min. of Environment and Forests, New Delhi (194.6 KiB, 1,175 hits)
Important Decisions of CIC Compiled by ISTM, New Delhi (July, 2010) (3.5 MiB, 755 hits)
II. CIC Decisions (Full Bench) IFFCO is not a Public Authority
Decision dated 05.08.2013 - Subhash Chandra Agrawal & Dr. M. Haroon Siddiqui Vs. IFFCO (Full Bench Decision) (403.9 KiB, 2,134 hits)
Decision dated 04.07.2013 - Lt. Col. (Retd.) R. Bansal Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) (Full Bench) (229.1 KiB, 2,004 hits)
Decision dated 03.06.2013 - Shri S.C. Aggarwal, Shri Anil Bailwal Vs. Parliament of India (Full Bench Decision) (257.0 KiB, 2,159 hits)
Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. PMO / Deptt. of Revenue / Min. of Law (Full Bench Decision) (108.3 KiB, 860 hits)
Decision dated 20.05.2013 - Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Ministry of Mines, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (52.3 KiB, 778 hits)
Decision dated 20.02.2013 - Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, Lok Sabha Sectt., New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (123.9 KiB, 1,085 hits)
Decision dated 10.10.2011 - Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) Vs. Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Full Bench Decision) (70.8 KiB, 894 hits)
Decision dated 26.08.2011 - Mr. Manish Bhatnagar, Delhi Vs. SPIO & Addl. Director, Deptt of Woman & Child Development, NCT of Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (92.7 KiB, 1,245 hits)
Decision dated 24.08.2011 - Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal, New Delhi Vs. CPIO, CBI, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (206.6 KiB, 784 hits)
Decision dated 31.01.2011 - Shri Z.U. Alvi Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI (Full Bench Decision) (79.9 KiB, 708 hits)
Decision dated 15.10.2010 - Shri Shanmuga Patro Vs. Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (Full Bench Decision) (73.2 KiB, 1,143 hits)
Decision dated 29.09.2010 - Brig. (Retd.) Ujjal Dasgupta (Dr. B. Malhotra-Representative Appellant) Vs. CDAC; Advocate for RAW, Director & CPIO, Cab. Sectt. (Full Bench Decision) (184.1 KiB, 970 hits)
Decision dated 28.09.2010 - Shri V.R. Chandran Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (Full Bench Decision) (349.5 KiB, 746 hits)
Decision dated 14.07.2010 - Ms. Bindu Khanna, New Delhi Vs. Dte. of Education, GNCT, New Delhi (Full Bench Decision) (76.9 KiB, 723 hits)
Decision dated 10.06.2010 - Shri Manohar, Shri J.K. Routray & Shri Gurbax Singh Vs. AGs of Goa, Orisaa and Punjab (362.4 KiB, 1,169 hits)
Go to Decisions of Central Information Commission – Section-Wise * RTI – Court judgements
Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. If you have a complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info[at]dtf.in.
