Pro forma for seeking vigilance clearance from CVC
Vigilance Awareness Week, 2024
CVC Circular dated 08.08.2023 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week, 2023 – regarding
CVC Circular dated 02.08.2023 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week, 2023
CVC Orders for Transfer/Posting of Vigilance Officers/Officials
Panel of Part-Time CVOs
Time limit and procedure for seeking reconsideration of CVC’s 1st Stage Advice
More …
Go to NEWS.
- CVC Circular dated 06.09.2024 – Pro forma for furnishing details of officers by the Cadre Controlling Authorities while seeking vigilance clearance (13-Point revised pro forma)
- CVC Circular dated 28.08.2024 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week (Theme: Culture of Integrity for Nation’s Prosperity) * CVC Circular dated 01.08.2024 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week, 2024
- CVC Circular dated 08.08.2023 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week, 2023 – regarding * CVC Circular dated 02.08.2023 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week, 2023 >>> CVC Circulars/Guidelines
- CVC Circular dated 26.06.2023 – Eligibility of facilities, perks, perquisites etc. to the CVOs, holding additional charge
- CVC O.M. dated 02.02.2022 – Revised Pro forma for furnishing details of the officers while seeking vigilance clearance – reg.
- CVC O.M. dated 05.01.2022 – Forwarding panel of officers to the Commission for appointment of part-time CVO in Ministries/Deptts./Autonomous Institutions, etc.
See all CVC Orders/Circulars at CVC Circulars/Guidelines
CVC Orders for Transfer/Posting of Vigilance Officers/Officials
Panel of Part-Time CVOs
Time limit and procedure for seeking reconsideration of CVC’s 1st Stage Advice
– CVC Circular dated 01.09.2021 – Observance of Vigilance Awareness Week 2021
Annual Report 2020 of Central Vigilance Commission (As on CVC website-31.08.2021)
– CVC Circular dated 23.08.2021 – Submission of online Quarterly Reports by CVOs
See all CVC Orders/Circulars at CVC Circulars/Guidelines
Guidelines regarding grant of ‘Vigilance Clearance’ to AIS officers
Jan 29, 2021
Comprehensive guidelines for grant of “Vigilance Clearance” to AIS officers were issued vide DoPT O.M. No.104/33/2005-AVD-I dated 29.10.2007. As per at para 3 of the O.M., in cases where complaints have been referred to the State Government and no substantive response has been received from the State Government within three months from the date on which the reference was made, the Cadre Controlling Authority may provide a copy of the complaint to the officer concerned to seek his comments. If the comments are found to be prima facie satisfactory by the Competent Authority, vigilance clearance shall be accorded.
The CVC, in para 2 of its O.M. dated 07.01.2021, has observed that it has come to the notice of the Commission that the guidelines in the said O.M. are not followed by the Competent Authority, due to which long pending complaints are shown against the officers while seeking Vigilance Clearance of the officer from the Commission. In some cases, the officers were not even aware that a complaint is pending against them.
In view of the above, the Commission has advised all the Cadre Controlling Authorities to strictly adhere to the guidelines at para 3 of the O.M. of DoPT dated 29.10.2007 before seeking vigilance clearance in respect of the individual officer from the Commission.
Copy of O.M. dated 07.01.2021 > CVC O.M. dated 07.01.2021-Guidelines regarding grant of ‘Vigilance Clearance’ to AIS Officers (reg. adherence to guidelines in para 3 in DoPT O.M. dated 29.10.2007)
You may like to click on any of the following links:-
* Latest DOPT / CVC / RTI / MOF / CGHS / DPE Orders/Circulars
* Consumer Court (NCDRC) Judgements
* Consumer Rights – Act/Rules, Court/Consumer Forum Judgements & Other Information
* Vigilance Clearance
* Verification of SC/ST/OBC Caste Status or Claims of SCs, STs and OBCs
CVC advice dated 22.12.2020
—–
CVC has advised examination of legal/court matters where the stay has been granted, in the light of the Supreme Court Judgement dated 28.03.2018
CVC have issued instructions regarding additional charge arrangements of CVOs of certain PSUs and appointment of Part-Time CVOs. See copy of the CVC’s O.M. dated 19.11.2020, below:-
‘Over 700 CBI investigations pending for more than a year’: Central Vigilance Commission
The apex vigilance body said a major share of complaints against public servants are vague, unverifiable and made to harass.
Hindustan Times
Sep 27, 2020
It was found that about 25 corruption investigations in CBI are pending beyond five years. Overall, total 1,239 investigations and enquiries were pending in CBI till December last year.
The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has claimed that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has been slow in investigating certain cases due to several reasons including work overload, delay in obtaining reply to the Letter Rogatories (LRs) sent to various countries seeking information, government departments not supplying relevant records and sanction to the agency, delay in obtaining forensic reports from laboratories, among other reasons.
Don’t Act On Anonymous Corruption Complaints, Directive to Government Departments
Anonymous complaints are those complaints which do not carry name and address of the complainant.
Sep 28, 2020 : Dtf.in
According to the Department of Personnel and Training’s O.M. dated 08.10.2018, no action is required to be taken on anonymous complaints, irrespective of the nature of the allegations and that such complaints need to be simply filed.
In this regard, the Central Vigilance Commission has issued further clarification as under:-
“The Commission has observed instances wherein some Departments/Organisations are taking cognizance of anonymous complaints, despite strict guidelines issued by DoPT and the CVC. Such non-compliance/violation of guidelines by the concerned authorities would be viewed seriously.”
See copies of DoPT O.M. dated 08.10.2018 and the CVC Circular dated 24.09.2020 at CVC Circulars/Guidelines
Benefit of Doubt
38 years on, man accused of selling adulterated haldi is cleared by SC
It has, inter alia, been held by Hon’ble Supreme Courtin the case of Prem Chand Vs. State of Haryana that “Although, the sample was received in the office of the public analyst on 20.08.1982 and the report was finalized on 07.09.1982 after the delay of 18 days. There is no evidence that the samples were not tampered within the intervening period, therefore benefit of doubt accrues in favor of the accused. Moreover, the report of the public analyst does not mention that the sample was either “insect infested” or was “unfit for human consumption”, in the absence of such an opinion, the prosecution has failed to establish the requirements of Section 2 (1a)(f) of the Act (See Delhi Administration. v. Sat Sarup Sharma, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 324). Moreover, no evidence has been adduced by the prosecution to prove the offence under Section 16 (1) of the Act either before the trial court or the High Court.” – SC Judgment dated 30.07.2020 – Prem Chand Vs. State of Haryana
Amit Shah inaugurates I4C, launches National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal
Zeenews.india.com
Jan 10, 2020
New Delhi: Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Friday inaugurated the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) to fight cyber crimes and the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal through which people can report cyber crimes online.The minister said that I4C is a 7 pronged scheme to fight cyber crime. …
Adultery No Ground For Action Against Government Employees : High Court
The Rajasthan High Court gave this ruling recently on a writ petition filed by two police officers, a man and a woman, who were charged by the state government in 1999 for having illicit relations.
Ndtv.com
March 17, 2019
JAIPUR: The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that the state government cannot begin departmental proceedings against any government employee for being involved in an extramarital relationship.
The court gave this ruling recently on a writ petition filed by two police officers, a man and a woman, who were charged by the state government in 1999 for having illicit relations. …
More:
Departmental Proceeding under the Payment of Gratuity Act >>> Court Judgements on Service Matters
Andhra Pradesh Bars CBI Officials From Entering State, Carrying Out Probe Without Informing Govt
In the absence of permission, the CBI cannot interfere with any case that takes place within the limits of AP any more. The state government cited lack of confidence in the CBI after its officials were accused in recent scams
News18.com
Nov 16, 2018
A notification by the state government issued this week says the general consent accorded to by the state to Delhi Special Police Establishment stand withdrawn. The CBI has was constituted under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946. …
Note:- It may be noted that the information in this website is subject to the Disclaimer of Dtf.in. However, in case there is any complaint with respect to any content published in this website, it may kindly be brought to our notice for appropriate action to remove such content as early as possible or publish the latest/updated content/event, if any, at info[at]dtf.in.